RE: go 229 is it even possible?
Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:31 pm
For the sake of realism I will just go for Dora-9 first, and only after first Anton-8s have entered service, in PBEM. Also I think its just as good if not better than Ta 152 H as a fighter at altitudes below 25-ish kilofeet, if not even higher. Any idea if the MVR rating given in the data sheets is approximated average through the altitudes or at certain altitude, or the best/worst?
The jets are probably fairly useless and not least because they are short legged and need, all the ones that are of any worth and still possible to get in production, 4 engines. At least against a human opponent the Me 262 is impossible to, thanks to need for 4 engines and short endurance time, build in sufficient numbers to use as main bomber killer. But then again I have never played the game to D-Day. Do 335 - Fw 190 D-9 combo probably works better, use same engine, can be build more than double the number and come available quicker than Ta 152s and Go 229.
The jets are probably fairly useless and not least because they are short legged and need, all the ones that are of any worth and still possible to get in production, 4 engines. At least against a human opponent the Me 262 is impossible to, thanks to need for 4 engines and short endurance time, build in sufficient numbers to use as main bomber killer. But then again I have never played the game to D-Day. Do 335 - Fw 190 D-9 combo probably works better, use same engine, can be build more than double the number and come available quicker than Ta 152s and Go 229.