Matrix Games Forums

Cheers Mate !

A small to medium sized scenario - like Siam/Burma - sure would come handy to learn the ropes of the land combat model.
As did a similiar scenario in WitP.

Well, I have the impression, that this is not on your agenda - rather an attempt on adapting the existing modeling to meaningful smaler scenarios. Which I applaud. And of course, since you do all the work, you are the one to call the shots.

However, significant deviations from the official rulebook in a scenario should be pointed out explicedly.
Like: No stategic moves on secondary RRs for the japanese. Issues with pulling experienced pilots into theaterbased air units etc.

What is more - a small/medium scenario should be closer to historical "niceties" than the GC - right ? Just by defininition of scope. Eliminatinmg the Rahaeang line of approach may get the "historical" dates in line (because of a longer approach march) - but not the historical options and the reasoning behind it.

Simply put: What is your point with this scenario.

My point was why not
 
everyone complains about not enough small map scenarios so why not write one was my logic.
 
this is a campaign full of what ifs given how the allies fought it so a small version seemed a good scen to do.

ps just because the version available now has all the pilots and leaders floating around dont expect the fianl one to I am limited by not haveing quite nailed down Japanese Sqns arriving post Feb 42 yet so I dont want to gut the pilot database quite yet

ps just posted another new scen in scen design sub forum Return to Wake

ORIGINAL: Andy Mac

ps just posted another new scen in scen design sub forum Return to Wake

xoxox