RE: OT-Wikipedia WOW
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:56 pm
Awww man...I missed this whole thing the first time around. Thank you all for providing me some group nostalgia. [:D]
ORIGINAL: wdolson
I know a lot of people on the forum tend to have a low opinion of Wikipedia. I've found a few factual errors there, but for the most part it's pretty accurate. I read somewhere that somebody did a study comparing Wikipedia to traditional encyclopedias like Britannica and found that Wikipedia was on par and sometimes more accurate with the traditional encyclopedias.
Bill
ORIGINAL: jeffk3510
ORIGINAL: Reg
ORIGINAL: JeffK
Does anyone remember the Chinese Lancasters someone posted to win an argument??[:D]
I was going to bring that up but you beat me to it!! (Nothing gets forgotten around here..) [:D]
For the newcomers (names have been omitted to protect the ????):
A while back a newbie made a hasty statement on these forums that the Chinese operated Lancaster aircraft. After the inevitable and unfavourable peer review on this very knowledgeable forum , he refused to back down and went to Wikipedia, updated the entry to backup his story and then cited the reference as part of his argument. Unfortunately he forgot that Wikipedia has a change log function... oops!!!
Cant fix stupid. [:D]