Page 2 of 2

RE: Giving orders at Regimental levels and above....

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:45 am
by wodin
Eric, thanks for the explanation.

I did say I was pretty clueless with regards to these things. I was just getting impatient because I didn't want to try the new patch until the lock up unit bug had been quashed.

As usual with these things once the patch arrives all is forgiven and apologies ensue.

So sorry for moaning.

Think of it this way. If we thought the game was crap we wouldn't even be here bemoaning the release of the patch. it's because the game is that good that impatience comes into play. Like petulant children wanting sweets NOW!!

Big thanks to Panther and Matrix.

RE: Giving orders at Regimental levels and above....

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:32 pm
by BletchleyGeek
Actually, I just started a mini-AAR of the Höfen Ho-Down scenario on the AAR section to check the formation lock-up thing. And it seems to be gone now (well, one Coy was reluctant to go forward, but given the situation, I can understand that [:D]).

RE: Giving orders at Regimental levels and above....

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:50 pm
by GBS
Could that reluctance of the reserve to commit be influenced by the morale and experience level of the unit along with the leadership and initiative ratings of the commander of the regiment/battalion?

RE: Giving orders at Regimental levels and above....

Posted: Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:59 pm
by BletchleyGeek
ORIGINAL: GBS

Could that reluctance of the reserve to commit be influenced by the morale and experience level of the unit along with the leadership and initiative ratings of the commander of the regiment/battalion?

(Answering to you in the wrong thread) [:)]

Yes, I think it's a combination of that and orders delay.