RE: Rommel fan...
Posted: Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:55 am
That is too simplistic an answer. According to O'Hara, 90% of supplies and
98% of troops reached North Africa. The "good times" for the RN were limited as Malta was largely untenable as a naval base - certainly for surface ships. The idea that intelligence told the British exactly where and when they could intercept a convoy is nonsense. Even if intelligence could pinpoint the position of a convoy, the RN ships would still need to get from Malta or Alexandria or Gibraltar - how long does that take?
There was a brief spell where the Malta Striking Force achieved considerable success, but this was for a limited time only. The attention of the Regia Aeronautica and, more importantly, Fliegerkorps X soon put a stop to that. The idea that Rommel lost the war in the desert because the majority of his supplies were sunk is fanciful.
You point about limited ports is correct - as I said previously.
98% of troops reached North Africa. The "good times" for the RN were limited as Malta was largely untenable as a naval base - certainly for surface ships. The idea that intelligence told the British exactly where and when they could intercept a convoy is nonsense. Even if intelligence could pinpoint the position of a convoy, the RN ships would still need to get from Malta or Alexandria or Gibraltar - how long does that take?
There was a brief spell where the Malta Striking Force achieved considerable success, but this was for a limited time only. The attention of the Regia Aeronautica and, more importantly, Fliegerkorps X soon put a stop to that. The idea that Rommel lost the war in the desert because the majority of his supplies were sunk is fanciful.
You point about limited ports is correct - as I said previously.