Page 2 of 2
RE: AAR Again ...in the pacific this time
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 11:06 pm
by junk2drive
Give a man a fish... etc
RE: AAR Again ...in the pacific this time
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 11:24 pm
by budd
Ok time to finish this :-]...I did think about trying this from the other side Joe, I'll look at the scenario list and see what strike me.
Onward we go

RE: AAR Again ...in the pacific this time
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 11:26 pm
by budd
So far no surprises

RE: AAR Again ...in the pacific this time
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 11:28 pm
by budd
all shots taken at 2200 at all contact points

RE: AAR Again ...in the pacific this time
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 11:33 pm
by budd
I finished off the enemy stack which released my units to push north. i withdrew my recon unit from north, enemy stack followed.

RE: AAR Again ...in the pacific this time
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 11:37 pm
by budd
as a side note here's an example of the hidden target thing.

RE: AAR Again ...in the pacific this time
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 11:42 pm
by budd
enemy counter attacking at both locations.

RE: AAR Again ...in the pacific this time
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 11:45 pm
by budd
Lost the airfield

RE: AAR Again ...in the pacific this time
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 11:47 pm
by budd
Things break open up north

RE: AAR Again ...in the pacific this time
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 11:54 pm
by budd
I wont bore you with the details. I rolled over the enemy in the north. See shots below, the enemy made it easy to take back the airfield.

RE: AAR Again ...in the pacific this time
Posted: Tue May 29, 2012 11:55 pm
by budd
final screen.
I'll look thru the scenario list and see where it takes.

RE: AAR Again ...in the pacific this time
Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 12:00 am
by junk2drive
Thanks again.
RE: AAR Again ...in the pacific this time
Posted: Wed May 30, 2012 3:00 am
by Fred98
Hmm the victory screen implies that the Japanese took no hits on infantry or armour but we know they did!
.
RE: AAR Again ...in the pacific this time
Posted: Thu May 31, 2012 10:59 pm
by sabre1
So does this indicate a bug?