RE: Moving res/oil from N China
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:54 am
I think the Japanese player seems to have a better time with resource movement from Urumchi based on past saves I have looked at.
What's your Strategy?
https://forums.matrixgames.com:443/
That would make sense as the IJ player is generally in a position to expend some supply to help it, the allies aren't when they need it. Later in the game, the allies don't care! [;)]ORIGINAL: michaelm
I think the Japanese player seems to have a better time with resource movement from Urumchi based on past saves I have looked at.
ORIGINAL: PaxMondo
Sorry, it can and does. Many people do it. No one has suggested that it is easy or that it happens overnight. You have to understand the alogrithm and be very careful in making sure that you are using it to your advantage. Tedious? yes. Beneficial? Oh, yeah.ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
As far as my limited experience goes, fuel moves, but not that far. Same goes for the myth that says that fuel hauled in Singapore ca run all the way to Port Arthur is the road is clear from enemy units... it doesn't.
I am not 100% positive, but i haven't read a single post saying "Yes, it happens in my game"
PS: See Nash's post above for someone who does it. There are quite a few others as well.
ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
However, the more i think of it, the more i don't "like" the overall idea. Convoys bringing oil and fuel from the SRA were one of the most important assets (and targets!) in the whole conflict...taking them out of the equation really seems strange to me...and it takes away a lot of "flavour" of the game.
Also i don't think it's fair towards the allied opponent... i remember playing with Rader the frustration i had not to be able to find any convoy...he probably used this strategy to bring everything to Fusan...
It was possible, they were doing it by wars end and the "roads"* existed then. You're thinking by todays western standards, not by how things were (and are) done in China and SE Asia. Think Ho Chi Minh Trail .... If you doubt, all I can say is that you have to have been there and seen/lived it to really understand what is capable and not capable of being done.ORIGINAL: Puhis
ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
However, the more i think of it, the more i don't "like" the overall idea. Convoys bringing oil and fuel from the SRA were one of the most important assets (and targets!) in the whole conflict...taking them out of the equation really seems strange to me...and it takes away a lot of "flavour" of the game.
Also i don't think it's fair towards the allied opponent... i remember playing with Rader the frustration i had not to be able to find any convoy...he probably used this strategy to bring everything to Fusan...
+1
It shouldn't be possible in this game. IRL it wasn't possible, there was no roads, railroads and capacity.
So I won't even try to use it. IMO it's just wrong.
One of the great parts of the game is that everyone can play their style. As long as no one is "insisting" I play their style, all is good.ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
ORIGINAL: PaxMondo
Sorry, it can and does. Many people do it. No one has suggested that it is easy or that it happens overnight. You have to understand the alogrithm and be very careful in making sure that you are using it to your advantage. Tedious? yes. Beneficial? Oh, yeah.ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
As far as my limited experience goes, fuel moves, but not that far. Same goes for the myth that says that fuel hauled in Singapore ca run all the way to Port Arthur is the road is clear from enemy units... it doesn't.
I am not 100% positive, but i haven't read a single post saying "Yes, it happens in my game"
PS: See Nash's post above for someone who does it. There are quite a few others as well.
Pax, i think i understood now what you mean. What you've posted in the other thread about how this "magic" works seems now clear to my eyes...
However, the more i think of it, the more i don't "like" the overall idea. Convoys bringing oil and fuel from the SRA were one of the most important assets (and targets!) in the whole conflict...taking them out of the equation really seems strange to me...and it takes away a lot of "flavour" of the game.
Also i don't think it's fair towards the allied opponent... i remember playing with Rader the frustration i had not to be able to find any convoy...he probably used this strategy to bring everything to Fusan...
I think i'll stick with the "old way"... anyway thank you so much for having explained how it works...this game is really a gem!!!!

ORIGINAL: PaxMondo
It was possible, they were doing it by wars end and the "roads"* existed then.ORIGINAL: Puhis
ORIGINAL: GreyJoy
However, the more i think of it, the more i don't "like" the overall idea. Convoys bringing oil and fuel from the SRA were one of the most important assets (and targets!) in the whole conflict...taking them out of the equation really seems strange to me...and it takes away a lot of "flavour" of the game.
Also i don't think it's fair towards the allied opponent... i remember playing with Rader the frustration i had not to be able to find any convoy...he probably used this strategy to bring everything to Fusan...
+1
It shouldn't be possible in this game. IRL it wasn't possible, there was no roads, railroads and capacity.
So I won't even try to use it. IMO it's just wrong.
Opinions do vary ... again.ORIGINAL: Puhis
ORIGINAL: PaxMondo
It was possible, they were doing it by wars end and the "roads"* existed then.ORIGINAL: Puhis
+1
It shouldn't be possible in this game. IRL it wasn't possible, there was no roads, railroads and capacity.
So I won't even try to use it. IMO it's just wrong.
No. We are not talking about rice cakes, rifle ammo and spare parts. Japan needed 12000 tons of crude oil/fuel each day. Not even millions of chinese can help you transport thousands of tons of crude oil each.
IRL tanker were the only way to transport notable amount of crude oil/fuel. Unfortunately game does have different reality.