Page 2 of 2

RE: Support leading the Assault

Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 9:32 am
by BletchleyGeek
It is "assaulting" but not moving or taking any action that incurs in fatigue accrual. But it's not resting, either, so fatigue is not being reduced. Maybe the activity should be reading "in reserve" or "standing by".

RE: Support leading the Assault

Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2014 9:46 am
by BletchleyGeek
ORIGINAL: Bobbyb1
PS Love the sound of the CO2 AI managed fire support concept but jeez that's gonna be hard to do! Great challenge:).

Prompted by your comment I took a look and reviewed how far we are from that. And we're already closer than I was aware of. Let's say that the infrastructure is about 50% complete, we need to finish that and then put the whole thing together (which is probably going to take as much work as that 50% infrastructure work that is missing).

We really need to wrap up CO1. I am merging the code every fortnight or so, but I am reluctant to start big jobs that might make difficult to integrate the changes and fixes correctly into the CO2 codebase. There just isn't enough man hours available so to allow us to keep maintaining CO1 and pushing fixes "upstream" to CO2.