Page 2 of 2
RE: New scenario January 1962 Rumble on the Grabfeld Plain
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2018 3:51 pm
by CapnDarwin
WABAC, the time in queue reflects how long a requested fire mission stays in the queue for the FSCC to assign to an available artillery or air support asset. The shorter the time the quicker old missions are dropped so newer mission requests can be performed. It can be used to reflect the command and control of the fires support chain.
RE: New scenario January 1962 Rumble on the Grabfeld Plain
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2018 8:47 pm
by WABAC
ORIGINAL: CapnDarwin
WABAC, the time in queue reflects how long a requested fire mission stays in the queue for the FSCC to assign to an available artillery or air support asset. The shorter the time the quicker old missions are dropped so newer mission requests can be performed. It can be used to reflect the command and control of the fires support chain.
thanks Capn.
Not sure if I would want it longer or shorter for that time period. For the Soviets it probably hadn't changed much from WW2. And there is probably a ton of that stuff online. For the US side I would have to dig through the online editions of Artillery Trends.
Maybe for Southern Storm. [;)]
RE: New scenario January 1962 Rumble on the Grabfeld Plain
Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2018 4:25 pm
by Jo van der Pluym
Hello WABAC
Can you also post the National Databases of the scenario?
RE: New scenario January 1962 Rumble on the Grabfeld Plain
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2018 4:41 pm
by WABAC
ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym
Hello WABAC
Can you also post the National Databases of the scenario?
Well. They're kind of messy right now. [:D] Lots of idiosyncrasies to suit the scenarios I am working on.
And I'm still wrestling with a few questions in my mind about protection factor and armor penetration numbers.
But, yes. I can post them once I get through my next scenario. I'm just working out the order of battle. So I hope to get it done this weekend or next.
RE: New scenario January 1962 Rumble on the Grabfeld Plain
Posted: Sun Oct 21, 2018 3:05 am
by Jo van der Pluym
ORIGINAL: WABAC
Well. They're kind of messy right now. [:D] Lots of idiosyncrasies to suit the scenarios I am working on.
And I'm still wrestling with a few questions in my mind about protection factor and armor penetration numbers.
But, yes. I can post them once I get through my next scenario. I'm just working out the order of battle. So I hope to get it done this weekend or next.
Thank you for youre reply.
RE: New scenario January 1962 Rumble on the Grabfeld Plain
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 10:30 pm
by WABAC
ORIGINAL: Jo van der Pluym
ORIGINAL: WABAC
Well. They're kind of messy right now. [:D] Lots of idiosyncrasies to suit the scenarios I am working on.
And I'm still wrestling with a few questions in my mind about protection factor and armor penetration numbers.
But, yes. I can post them once I get through my next scenario. I'm just working out the order of battle. So I hope to get it done this weekend or next.
Thank you for youre reply.
I need to create a silhouette for the M103 heavy tank, and then the US side will be ready for anyone to error check.
The biggest hurdle (besides life getting in the way of a good game) was finding numbers for the late 50's tank guns that seemed probable. The rule of 15 has been rigorously applied, with no rounding up.
RE: New scenario January 1962 Rumble on the Grabfeld Plain
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2018 11:02 pm
by CapnDarwin
Here ya go...M103 sil
RE: New scenario January 1962 Rumble on the Grabfeld Plain
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2018 10:47 pm
by WABAC
ORIGINAL: CapnDarwin
Here ya go...M103 sil
Thanks for the art Cap.
I kind of ran into a cold and foundered on tactical fighter-bombers checking the numbers one last time.