Page 2 of 2
RE: Chinese Surface Combattants
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 11:27 am
by Dimitris
Quite interesting analysis. Thanks for taking the time to articulate this in detail!
RE: Chinese Surface Combattants
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 2:33 pm
by magi
Great thread.....
RE: Chinese Surface Combattants
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 3:08 pm
by DeSade
I would add one more thing concerning naval HQ-9.
In DB TargetAltitudeMin parameter is set at 200 ft, which means it has substantial penalty against low flying ASM. While high minimum altitude engagement is a well known weakness of land-based HQ-9, as per Hongjian posts naval versions are more advanced variants related to FD-2000, which should have TargetAltitudeMin set more like other modern AAW systems.
RE: Chinese Surface Combattants
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2015 3:33 pm
by Hongjian
Yep, as we can see, the FD-2000 has 25m minimum engagement altitude (about 80 feet).
RE: Chinese Surface Combattants
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2015 6:30 pm
by DirtyFred
great work, Hongjian!
i used this resources to get up to speed on chinese naval vessels:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s ... face_Force
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People%27s ... rine_Force
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ac ... watercraft
in thanks for your effort:
China Naval Modernization: Implications for
U.S. Navy Capabilities—Background and
Issues for Congress
https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33153.pdf
RE: Chinese Surface Combattants
Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2015 2:50 pm
by Hongjian
Ah, and before I forget.
Please add on the 054/A, 052B/C/D ships a Band-Stand/Mineral-ME OTH targeting radar like on the Sovremenny DDGs. Upon exploring the DB, I found that they do not have these sensors, even though they do have them in reality.
You can see those domes ontop of these ship's bridges and in that coloured schematic of the 052C DDG posted above.
Thanks!
RE: Chinese Surface Combattants
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 12:14 pm
by Dysta
Sorry for surfacing this thread.
It seems the effort for finding more electric systems for Chinese vessels in many updates are ongoing few months ago, but still not getting at what we hoped for.
In fact, I may use this thread to post extra information regarding the current systems many Chinese warships have, as well as the missing system/platform in DB3000.
Currently I am keep looking for more ECM suites, this may save some times for my research.
RE: Chinese Surface Combattants
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2015 1:18 pm
by thewood1
Why not post them in the DB3000 update thread?
RE: Chinese Surface Combattants
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2015 7:52 am
by Dysta
ORIGINAL: thewood1
Why not post them in the DB3000 update thread?
You have a point here, sadly I cannot redirect posts because I can't post link yet. I only use this for temporary reference.