ORIGINAL: Symon
Good on you Fred. Some of us here look at things in terms of a critical thinking model. Our Philippine scenario is predicated on the time-advance of the pipeline.
We know who did what to whom, and when, and why, and got righteous about giving MacArthur what he was promised (or at least what was on the docks).
I haven't purchased the game yet, I shall a little later in the month when I have some incoming on my Paypal account. In the meantime I am studying the (original)
manual and various threads here. I am very excited to see what the game is doing with all the transports under way, those recently left that were diverted back
to the West Coast and those about to depart the West Coast and Hawaii, when the war broke out. There was an immense load of equipment in the pipeline. How much I
didn't understand untill I read Glenn Williford's: Racing the Sunrise. But I had my suspicions.
There should be a game version starting on April 1st 1942. Perhaps it is? That could illustrate what would have happened if the Japanese had held their horses for
as long as MacArthur and Marshall hoped for.
I am not a piss on MacArthur person. I don't like him, and I don't think he was all that great strategically, at the time, but he was an operational genius. Genius does not imply perfection in every endeavor. Genius implies thinking/acting outside the box in a manner that will accomplish the mission.
Pretty dry stuff, but I like to think of Generals, and even Majors and Colonels, in terms of elegance. Some got it. Some don't. Mac, for all his warts, had elegance. Ciao. JWE
Actually, myself I have little opinions on MacArthur as a person but I think what he did just before the war broke has been greatly under-rated. Particularly
the fact that he wanted to defend the whole of the Philippines, he has been much "pissed on" for that. The effect of his work on this was effectively nullified by
Hart's unwillingness to give support to ANY supply runs to the Philippines, even to the Southern islands. This is what happens when the military branches are
allowed to operate after each their own head. Just my opinion. There were independent submarine supply operations but, as I understand it, those were executed quite
unwillingly, too.
It's a Little funny, my attention was drawn to the story of MacArthur and the Philippines much as they were to Operation Sea Lion. I reacted to the unison ridiculing
by many in the web discussions. Could MacArthur, or the Germans, for that matter, be as amateurish as they were portrayed?
Regarding MacArthur, in my opinion, the proof of his greatness is shown by what happened on Mindanao and the Visayas. That was a great opportunity for the allies
but they did not grab it.
Fred