Page 2 of 2
RE: Why Command Ops 2?
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 8:58 pm
by Werewolf13
I didn't say you were going to charge for patches, Arjuna. I said MAJOR upgrades. The reference to patches was sarcasm - see my response to aaatoysandmore for more detail.
That said: you can paint it anyway you want but the facts are - as written by you on the LnL forum - that every time you publish a MAJOR upgrade (you get to define what a Major Upgrade is) it'll cost to upgrade playable content to the new upgrade version. Period. You get to pay the cost of a new game everytime y'all Major Upgrade.
RE: Why Command Ops 2?
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 9:01 pm
by Erik Rutins
Hi guys,
Per Arjuna's request, it's probably best if further discussion moves over to their forum.
Regards,
- Erik
RE: Why Command Ops 2?
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2015 9:02 pm
by aaatoysandmore
deleted per Erik's request. [&o]
RE: Why Command Ops 2?
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 2:13 am
by Arjuna
ORIGINAL: Werewolf1326
Oh - by the way - not being able to tell the difference between sarcasm and not sarcasm is - according to the latest alzheimers research - an early sign of that condition. You may wanna keep track of that.
That is a form of abuse Werewolf1326. It was uncalled for. I would normally say that you should be ashamed of yourself but then bullies rarely are.
RE: Why Command Ops 2?
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2015 4:03 am
by aaatoysandmore
As good as command ops is though it's worth the price for the added content. Can't wait for the Pacific stuff. [:)]
RE: Why Command Ops 2?
Posted: Sat Apr 25, 2015 5:04 am
by fodder
bump
RE: Why Command Ops 2?
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 8:00 am
by IainMcNeil
As Arjuna & Erik have requested lets move all discussion to the new forum and I'm closing this because of the tone of some of the posts before it turns really nasty.