Page 2 of 2
RE: What next?
Posted: Sun Mar 13, 2016 1:56 am
by dhhd
ORIGINAL: wodin
I truely think WW1 would be absolutely perfect..Maybe drop the scale though.
One of those "wow if someone made a game of this I would be happy" is a WWI game where you lay out all your plans, wego style, then watch as everything falls apart because, lacking portable radios, it's very hard to control advancing troops.
RE: What next?
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:10 pm
by wodin
Really, I find it more immersive than any other wargame at this scale.
ORIGINAL: RCH
I really like DC2 and when I bought DC3 it had a special price for DC1 so I bought it.
Looking at the development of the series I have to post here that DC3 crossed the too abstract realm and I just don't like it. The basic challenges of an Eastern Front game have been largely unaddressed. DC3 does not have a feel of the Eastern Front.
I have been playing DC1 and it is a great game.
I think it would be better to get the basics down before you venture off into roll playing.
RE: What next?
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2016 6:24 pm
by wodin
Me too. During the War I'd like to be able to slowley ge tmore advanced options to my plans as we learn slowley from our mistakes and new ways to do a set piece battle. Lots of planning went into the big set piece battles, from railways and train ime schedules upwards. All this I'd like to have to plan. Then see how the battle unfiolds..desperately trying to react to most likely old intel. I think a game like this would make people understand the difficulties of planning that War.
ORIGINAL: dhhd
ORIGINAL: wodin
I truely think WW1 would be absolutely perfect..Maybe drop the scale though.
One of those "wow if someone made a game of this I would be happy" is a WWI game where you lay out all your plans, wego style, then watch as everything falls apart because, lacking portable radios, it's very hard to control advancing troops.