Page 2 of 2
RE: Is WW1 Too Hot to Touch for Gaming?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 4:54 pm
by E
ORIGINAL: radic202
I had a friend who loved WW2 games but could not stand WW1 games because he said that ... "no fighter planes per se attacking each other" ...
Your friend could not be any more wrong on this particular subject.
RE: Is WW1 Too Hot to Touch for Gaming?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 5:23 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: E
ORIGINAL: radic202
I had a friend who loved WW2 games but could not stand WW1 games because he said that ... "no fighter planes per se attacking each other" ...
Your friend could not be any more wrong on this particular subject.
warspite1
Well quite, how was the Red Baron killed - for one - if it was not against an RAF Sopwith Camel (piloted by a Canadian by the way)?
RE: Is WW1 Too Hot to Touch for Gaming?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 5:45 pm
by RedLancer
There is good reason that WW1 games are few and far between - trying to code the huge changes in land warfare tactics between 1914 and 1918 is very complex. 1914 had lots in common with 1815 and 1918 with 1945. 1914 had little in common with 1918.
Having read Mark Adkin's Western Front Companion I've often thought how would you turn WW1 into a game.
My initial thoughts are to accurately depict the Western Front tactically you probably need to be at no more than Brigade level with no more than a mile wide hex. I'd look at a WEGO system which would better simulate the problems of outrunning communications and artillery co-ordination. However even at that scale with say, day long turns, an operational or strategic game becomes almost impossible.
RE: Is WW1 Too Hot to Touch for Gaming?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 5:59 pm
by Capt. Harlock
Well quite, how was the Red Baron killed - for one - if it was not against an RAF Sopwith Camel (piloted by a Canadian by the way)?
Without disparaging Capt. Arthur "Roy" Brown's contribution (which probably saved his friend), the weight of the evidence seems to be that the fatal shot was fired from the ground, likely by an Australian machine gunner.
RE: Is WW1 Too Hot to Touch for Gaming?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 6:08 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock
Well quite, how was the Red Baron killed - for one - if it was not against an RAF Sopwith Camel (piloted by a Canadian by the way)?
Without disparaging Capt. Arthur "Roy" Brown's contribution (which probably saved his friend), the weight of the evidence seems to be that the fatal shot was fired from the ground, likely by an Australian machine gunner.
warspite1
Maybe - but regardless of who fired the shot - the point is that, unlike the poster's friend's assertion, aerial duals were fought in WWI.
RE: Is WW1 Too Hot to Touch for Gaming?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 6:34 pm
by Zorch
ORIGINAL: Capt. Harlock
Well quite, how was the Red Baron killed - for one - if it was not against an RAF Sopwith Camel (piloted by a Canadian by the way)?
Without disparaging Capt. Arthur "Roy" Brown's contribution (which probably saved his friend), the weight of the evidence seems to be that the fatal shot was fired from the ground, likely by an Australian machine gunner.
Agreed...the only question is who on the ground fired the fatal shot.
RE: Is WW1 Too Hot to Touch for Gaming?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 6:46 pm
by E
ORIGINAL: warspite1
Maybe - but regardless of who fired the shot - the point is that, unlike the poster's friend's assertion, aerial duals were fought in WWI.
Fighter plane vs fighter plane was invented and honed in WWI. Most all fighter maneuvers still in use today, were invented and honed in WWI. Popularizing the term "dogfight" for aerial combat was done in WWI.
(and regarding the aside, it was an Australian ground gunner who got Snoopy's nemesis. As the autopsy showed the fatal wounds entered low on his back and exited high... an angle Brown never had on him, but consistent with the angle of the Aussie gunners on the ground at the right time and place.)

RE: Is WW1 Too Hot to Touch for Gaming?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 8:00 pm
by altipueri
Wasn't Sopwith a great little WW1 PC game about 1984?
RE: Is WW1 Too Hot to Touch for Gaming?
Posted: Mon May 16, 2016 10:32 pm
by operating
Very thorough observations!!!
RE: Is WW1 Too Hot to Touch for Gaming?
Posted: Tue May 24, 2016 3:27 pm
by Greybriar
ORIGINAL: altipueri
Wasn't Sopwith a great little WW1 PC game about 1984?
I don't know how great it was (meaning I never played it myself) but there was a PC game by the name of
Sopwith that was released in 1984.
RE: Is WW1 Too Hot to Touch for Gaming?
Posted: Tue May 24, 2016 4:40 pm
by Kuokkanen
ORIGINAL: Greybriar
ORIGINAL: altipueri
Wasn't Sopwith a great little WW1 PC game about 1984?
I don't know how great it was (meaning I never played it myself) but there was a PC game by the name of
Sopwith that was released in 1984.
Looks much like
Triplane Turmoil