Page 2 of 2

RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 6:21 am
by Smirfy

In sheer numbers of obsolete equipment that had lost utility on the Western Front Kursk is impressive. A World War one battle fought in the Second world War. When you look at the industrial capacity to mount the V program, the U Boat War, Air War not to overlook flak all facing west its nothing to get excited about. The Russian front did what it did put Germany in a personnel war while the West denied them any materiel advantage to deploy there.

RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2016 12:00 pm
by stolypin
The best book I have ever read on Kursk is by George Nipe (though it covers only the southern wing of the battle).

In addition to excellent combat coverage, he discusses the various myths associated with the Kursk battle.

RE: Tiger, Tiger Burning Bright: Why Kursk is the Most Overhyped Battle in History

Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 1:12 pm
by GamesaurusRex
I thought the Battle of Kursk was notable just due to the sheer number of tanks that were involved.