Page 2 of 4
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 11:50 am
by AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: Leandros
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
And the Browning appear to be a local mod on the bipod. The standard issue wad shorter legged.
Actually it was adjustable in height.
Fred
Yes it was. But look at how long this one is. There may have been a post war version that was longer , but any of the world war two versions I've seen or handled didn't extend that far.
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:06 pm
by Leandros
You may be right. Anyway, good job by the guy....[:)]..
Fred
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:10 pm
by witpqs
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
ORIGINAL: Leandros
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
And the Browning appear to be a local mod on the bipod. The standard issue wad shorter legged.
Actually it was adjustable in height.
Fred
In a communications seminar I
actually attended, the instructor
actually emphasized to never say/write "
actually" when you are
actually correcting someone. It is
actually like slapping them in the face and
actually saying "You idiot! How could you not know that!".
I actually fixed your post for you. [:'(]
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:36 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
ORIGINAL: Leandros
ORIGINAL: AW1Steve
And the Browning appear to be a local mod on the bipod. The standard issue wad shorter legged.
Actually it was adjustable in height.
Fred
In a communications seminar I attended, the instructor emphasized to never say/write "
actually" when you are correcting someone. It is like slapping them in the face and saying "You idiot! How could you not know that!".
Are you saying to Fred that he
actually shouldn't be correcting someone in that fashion? [:'(]
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:38 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
It is like slapping them in the face and saying "You idiot! How could you not know that!".
And? What's wrong with that? [:D]
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:40 pm
by MakeeLearn
ROK soldiers in Vietnam?!
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:40 pm
by Lecivius
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
It is like slapping them in the face and saying "You idiot! How could you not know that!".

RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:41 pm
by AW1Steve
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
It is like slapping them in the face and saying "You idiot! How could you not know that!".
And? What's wrong with that? [:D]
Absolutely nothing wrong with that. I've had much worse than that. Especially here on this forum. Why just the other day , "somebody" suggested that I be sold for scrap. No buyers though. [:D]
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:47 pm
by MakeeLearn
ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn
ROK soldiers in Vietnam?!
Yes....
"The soldier is from the Baekma Division (White Horse) which is the 9th infantry.
"On November 27, 1967, a soldier of the 30th regiment of the Baekma Division (백마부대) rescues Vietnamese children at the battle of Dien Can. This soldier's name is An Sang-Byung (안상병). ""
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:49 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn
ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn
ROK soldiers in Vietnam?!
Yes....
"The soldier is from the Baekma Division (White Horse) which is the 9th infantry.
"On November 27, 1967, a soldier of the 30th regiment of the Baekma Division (백마부대) rescues Vietnamese children at the battle of Dien Can. This soldier's name is An Sang-Byung (안상병). ""
Interesting. Where did you find this, MakeeLearn?
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:49 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn
ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn
ROK soldiers in Vietnam?!
Yes....
"The soldier is from the Baekma Division (White Horse) which is the 9th infantry.
"On November 27, 1967, a soldier of the 30th regiment of the Baekma Division (백마부대) rescues Vietnamese children at the battle of Dien Can. This soldier's name is An Sang-Byung (안상병). ""
Interesting. Where did you find this, MakeeLearn?
Yes. Interesting. I'd be interested in finding the source of this too, MakeeLearn. [;)]
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:50 pm
by MakeeLearn
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn
ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn
ROK soldiers in Vietnam?!
Yes....
"The soldier is from the Baekma Division (White Horse) which is the 9th infantry.
"On November 27, 1967, a soldier of the 30th regiment of the Baekma Division (백마부대) rescues Vietnamese children at the battle of Dien Can. This soldier's name is An Sang-Byung (안상병). ""
Interesting. Where did you find this, MakeeLearn?
http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/ ... 6-picture/
https://www.reddit.com/r/MilitaryPorn/c ... _during_a/
http://www.usmilitariaforum.com/forums/ ... n-vietnam/
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 12:55 pm
by MakeeLearn
It was the tight cut of the pants, cuff, that made me feel that this was not US forces.

RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 1:02 pm
by AW1Steve
https://www.reddit.com/r/HistoryPorn/co ... _the_30th/ I knew the ROK Marines and Tiger division was there , but not the 9th. That explains the uniforms and the browning. I find it interesting that one of the troops has insecticide in his helmet band , just like USA troops did. [:)]
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 1:07 pm
by Chickenboy
Since we're picking nits (pun intended), troops in Vietnam carried insect repellent in their headbands rather than insecticide per se.
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 1:10 pm
by MakeeLearn
insecticide mixed with c-ration peanut butter = cooking fire fuel.
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 1:12 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn
insecticide mixed with c-ration peanut butter = cooking fire fuel.
And C-4. That was also used as a very useful cooking fire fuel.
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 1:18 pm
by MakeeLearn
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: MakeeLearn
insecticide mixed with c-ration peanut butter = cooking fire fuel.
And C-4. That was also used as a very useful cooking fire fuel.
As long as you don't stomp the fire out [;)]
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 1:34 pm
by Leandros
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
Are you saying to Fred that he actually shouldn't be correcting someone in that fashion? [:'(]
It wasn't actually
meant as a
correction. More like a supplement to the discussion. And, I haven't actually
attended that course of BB's, soo.....or any other for that matter. Haven't actually handled an A6 either, or seen its bipod, for that matter.
The A4, on the other hand.... Or is
it in the other hand....?
His boots look Marines to me. But the picture can be found if one googles korean soldiers in Vietnam.
Fred
Korean soldier in Vietnam with 1919A6:
RE: OT:Just because
Posted: Thu Oct 26, 2017 1:47 pm
by witpqs
Actually a good post, Fred. [:D]