Page 2 of 2

RE: Atomic bombs over Tokyo

Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2018 5:09 pm
by rustysi
Alas, I believe this thinking is changing these days. Lots of scenario presentations about how a response to small scale tactical nuclear weapons would pan out, particularly if initial targets were military targets and the nominal yield used was small and controlled.

A very dangerous perception.[:(]

RE: Atomic bombs over Tokyo

Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2018 10:21 pm
by Lokasenna
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Does anyone know if the atomic bomb 'delivery' mission can be intercepted by CAP? Wouldn't that be a bummer...[X(]

I've never seen an example of it happening.

RE: Atomic bombs over Tokyo

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 5:07 am
by Yaab
Since Allied incendiary bombs are not represented in WITP:AE, the atomic rule would mean that Tokyo gets a sort of double indemnity from destruction.

RE: Atomic bombs over Tokyo

Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2018 4:24 pm
by BBfanboy
ORIGINAL: Yaab

Since Allied incendiary bombs are not represented in WITP:AE, the atomic rule would mean that Tokyo gets a sort of double indemnity from destruction.
I don't agree with your first assertion. I have achieved firestorms up to ONE MILLION during Superfort raids. When you select "Manpower attack", I think the game allows extra fire effects to represent incendiaries. I certainly never get high fire levels bombing anything else.

RE: Atomic bombs over Tokyo

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2018 12:16 pm
by Yaab


Still, forty 500lb incendiary cluster bombs in one B-29 = 1520 M69 incendiary bomblets

100 B29s = 152,000 bomblets

M-69 incendiary bomb assembled
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPteVZyF4U0

I guess WITP:AE engine is too limited to enable the special loadouts.

RE: Atomic bombs over Tokyo

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 5:28 am
by 1275psi
ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Does anyone know if the atomic bomb 'delivery' mission can be intercepted by CAP? Wouldn't that be a bummer...[X(]

I've never seen an example of it happening.
A long time ago in the little ship that could, my CAP damaged the B-29, and the bomb aimed at Tokyo
DID NO DAMAGE AT ALL........i wrote that it missed to explain that.

RE: Atomic bombs over Tokyo

Posted: Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:44 pm
by BBfanboy
ORIGINAL: 1275psi

ORIGINAL: Lokasenna

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy

Does anyone know if the atomic bomb 'delivery' mission can be intercepted by CAP? Wouldn't that be a bummer...[X(]

I've never seen an example of it happening.
A long time ago in the little ship that could, my CAP damaged the B-29, and the bomb aimed at Tokyo
DID NO DAMAGE AT ALL........i wrote that it missed to explain that.
I remember that - the Emperor was in the wrong spot at the wrong time ... and the war went on without him.
The lack of fighter escort for the A-bomb missions IRL shows how completely helpless the Japanese air force was to conduct a decent defence.