Page 2 of 2
RE: Chinese Anyone?
Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2019 9:31 am
by AMSwift
I'm not actually using nay of the new capabilities in 2.28b. I just swapped in my basic TO&E NATO icons, which are uploaded on the scenario repository.
RE: Chinese Anyone?
Posted: Sat Apr 27, 2019 1:29 pm
by cpdeyoung
Great fun.
I know Korea is easier, but I like Korea vs. all, two turn pause, and then "war of all against all".
Chuck
RE: Chinese Anyone?
Posted: Sun Apr 28, 2019 2:41 pm
by ernieschwitz
ORIGINAL: AMSwift
I'm not actually using nay of the new capabilities in 2.28b. I just swapped in my basic TO&E NATO icons, which are uploaded on the scenario repository.
Ah ok. Well, they look great anyway

RE: Chinese Anyone?
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2019 11:19 pm
by lion_of_judah
whats the latest update for this game and where can I find it. I checked the members only section, but all I was able to see was 227g. Thanks
RE: Chinese Anyone?
Posted: Tue Apr 30, 2019 11:20 pm
by lion_of_judah
I find this scenario to be one of the best ever.....
RE: Chinese Anyone?
Posted: Wed May 01, 2019 11:09 am
by LJBurstyn
Some comments about this scenario.
No weather?
Science goes too fast and too far for 1920's. Planes should be biplanes not single wing stats. Tanks should be early models--like the tankette.
Other than that the 11 player all out war (everyone goes to war with everyone else) with two turn start is good scenario. Single player cannot form alliances with anyone in game with all out war in less than 11 players.
RE: Chinese Anyone?
Posted: Wed May 01, 2019 7:56 pm
by ernieschwitz
Well,
If I wanted to make it more than just a tongue in cheek attempt at the situation at the time, I definately would have done something more about research and aircraft types, tanks etc. etc. But I didn't.
