Matrix Games Forums

I need the new Australian bases in those locations can someone just check the names are reasoanble

[:D][:D][:D]
The names seem perfectly Aussie to me, but as to their reality … well one of our 'mates' will need to help us out.
[:'(][:'(][:'(]

I assume it is stock scenario, not extended map one, right?

ORIGINAL: Yaab

We have been warned, but HansBolter is probably enticed.

If it ain't Babes based I have little interest.

I can never go back to the stock scenario Allied LCU countermix.

That was the reason I pestered Andy Mac to create a Babes based Ironman scenario when I was providing play testing feedback to him on the development of the Ironman scenarios.

I'll keep playing Ironman Japan Ported to Babes, scenario 40, hoping Andy Mac gets around to giving it an update some day.

But, hey thanks for thinking of me.

bump

Hey Andy:

I. I've really been enjoying this mod: who knew that betting the tar kicked out of you could be so fun!

II. The fighter and dive bomber squadrons on the Graf Zeppelin and Peter Strasser arrive as carrier capable, not carrier trained. Is this intended?

buno

Should this be played on Historical, Hard, or Very Hard difficulty setting? I have added 90 points in options from Andymacs other post.

ORIGINAL: CV10

Hey Andy:

I. I've really been enjoying this mod: who knew that betting the tar kicked out of you could be so fun!

II. The fighter and dive bomber squadrons on the Graf Zeppelin and Peter Strasser arrive as carrier capable, not carrier trained. Is this intended?

its an error but not a big one they get there in a few weeks

ORIGINAL: Nomad

Should this be played on Historical, Hard, or Very Hard difficulty setting? I have added 90 points in options from Andymacs other post.

Personally I always play on Historical or Hard depending on how masochistic I am feeling and bump it up to very hard for a few days once every 6 weeks or so.

Out of interest which options did you take !!

Let me try again

It looks like 88 not 90

Nice should be interesting

Can you share that point system , seems an interesting way to start against T3 ironman

You can find it here: https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/tm.asp?m=4906600

Thanks!

I have been playing the Insanity mod; Thanks.

I don't know what you did to the ai supply; but the Battle of Koggala started in Jan 42'; the Japanese never took the base and had the supply penalty for 20 months, it wrecked about 12 divisions of allied troops even though they had been out of supply for 20 months.

Don't ever let JohnIII see your Rita stats, got the fighters couldn't catch them message on their way in, and the 12 allied fighters shot down for every Rita is distressing.
It is a fun scenario

ORIGINAL: Bearcat2

I have been playing the Insanity mod; Thanks.

I don't know what you did to the ai supply; but the Battle of Koggala started in Jan 42'; the Japanese never took the base and had the supply penalty for 20 months, it wrecked about 12 divisions of allied troops even though they had been out of supply for 20 months.

Don't ever let JohnIII see your Rita stats, got the fighters couldn't catch them message on their way in, and the 12 allied fighters shot down for every Rita is distressing.
It is a fun scenario

Here another one with the same "situation". I have rotated my troops soooo much that I had to make an excel more detailed than in PBEM. It's make this front stagnant, wining by conquest looks impossible, just by points starving japanese units...

I have reached Apr '42 and the only suggestion would be to see if the IJN CV/CVLs would target ports more than AFs, if possible. I can disband in ports and they hit the AFs before cruising away leaving my ships alone.
But so many small carrier TF running amok!! [:D]

nevermind