Matrix Games Forums

Machine gun is all that is need against Polish Cavalry [:D]

I jest of course, but it's all relative.

ORIGINAL: Michael T

Machine gun is all that is need against Polish Cavalry [:D]

I jest of course, but it's all relative.

Poland had 150 of these:

http://www.tanks-encyclopedia.com/ww2/p ... sh_7TP.php

Germany had 2700 odd AFV. Many Hundreds with 37mm or better gun.

Besides, Stuka take care of those few tanks [:D]

Speaking of using the editor, I seem to be unable to figure out how to save any changes. Do you have to overwrite the initial scenario?

Completely agree.

At this level and with the invasion of Poland you should not be missing a Corp.[:-][:-]

ORIGINAL: Ingtar

Speaking of using the editor, I seem to be unable to figure out how to save any changes. Do you have to overwrite the initial scenario?

You just enter in a new name in this location. I purposely leave it blank so players are self aware of what they are saving as so you don't override something else.

I'm an OoB and ToE "geek." I have noticed glaring OoB omissions in all of the scenarios. I have to start fiddling with the Editor...

Well 2 armored corps use less oil than 4! Which brings me to a logical conclusion of tweaking oil usage. Shouldn't oil using units consume a fraction, based on max strength, of their oil factor if they are at reduced strength?

ORIGINAL: James Taylor

Well 2 armored corps use less oil than 4! Which brings me to a logical conclusion of tweaking oil usage. Shouldn't oil using units consume a fraction, based on max strength, of their oil factor if they are at reduced strength?

That's certainly how it worked in Commander Europe at War, IIRC

ORIGINAL: Michael T

Germany had 2700 odd AFV. Many Hundreds with 37mm or better gun.

Germany had also half or more of her army equipped with Panzer I and II - i.e. the "training panzers". Some Polish vehicles were quite better than those.

Hitler's luck was the conquest of Czechoslovakia the year before and the subsequent influx of Czech tanks for the German Army.

Besides, Stuka take care of those few tanks [:D]

I'm reminded of the joke that Tom Clancy put in Red Storm Rising: "Two Russian Generals meet in Paris. 'By the way', one says, 'who won the air war?'..." [:D]

ORIGINAL: Montbrun

I'm an OoB and ToE "geek." I have noticed glaring OoB omissions in all of the scenarios. I have to start fiddling with the Editor...

Different sources give different configurations. Then I have to understand which units had nothing and which had full strength. Then I have to condense it down to what is workable in the game. So there are always adjustments.

ORIGINAL: James Taylor

Well 2 armored corps use less oil than 4! Which brings me to a logical conclusion of tweaking oil usage. Shouldn't oil using units consume a fraction, based on max strength, of their oil factor if they are at reduced strength?

I will add this to the list.