RE: T4 - Bombing the fish
Posted: Sat Jan 11, 2020 8:34 am
ORIGINAL: bomccarthy
ORIGINAL: loki100
I've always (lazily) assumed that the Coastal assets you get are only a portion of what the Allies had? I really should double check as it may be the low replacements reflects other demands - or that these were complicated aircraft and probably diverted a lot of scarce resources.
I'm certain the multi-engine squadrons in the game represent most everything employed by Coastal Command/Coastal Air Force/USN in Western Europe; however, the game doesn't have the FAA squadrons based in the north (Wildcats, Hellcats, and even some Corsairs), although these were relatively few compared to the RAF fighter forces.
ORIGINAL: loki100
I'm pretty sure the range of naval guns is as before. I do think I have one (or two?) more TF, but I've not kept any old saves to check against. But in an AI test, I ended up with 7 in the UK and still had 5 in the Med. Its a while since I played WiTW but I recall having 10 before (this was for Feb 44 or so).
This may reflect adding extra allied naval assets, what it does do is make me a bit less cautious once attrition goes over 30% and it seems to make it easier to both prep for further landings and have a lot of artillery just floating around.
I always checked the composition of the fire support task groups attached to the task forces prior to committing them to an invasion - you can see the number and size of the guns in the task group. In the earlier versions of the scenarios, task groups with guns larger than 8" didn't arrive until early 1944 (representing the battleships Texas, Arkansas, and Nevada, as well as the RN monitors, I assume).
In a northern France invasion, I typically used those TFs with smaller guns as the "assault group", with TFs possessing 14" and greater guns as "invasion fire support"; I also used the big gun TFs to support land attacks against the Channel ports.
Heres a terrible confession, I've been playing this game since release, I guess I sort of know what I'm doing (ahem) and I never realised the different TFs were configured to different specifications. I just assumed they were interchangeable. Well now I have more, the really big ones will indeed have a very special role in reducing all the likely fortresses in N France.
re Coastal Command - I think that reinforces a long held view that the game is better for a house rule not to move them out of the UK in that case. They should have as much a role in U-Boat VP gain/loss as the strategic efforts?
ORIGINAL: John B.
Thanks for the AAR!
glad you are enjoying it, as above had forgotten (too much WiTE2 testing) just how good WiTW is (esp PBEM)
ORIGINAL: GloriousRuse
A German Interlude: As Italy Betrays Me (End of T6)
....
Hope that readers find this useful. I always find AARs from both sides more informative - even if the posts aren't turn and turn about (as I did with Narwhal for the AGEOD classics).
I'm constantly trying out new ideas (& have a bad habit of changing my mind half way through). So whether my choices are good is debateable (and whether in the longer term they pay off is another question).
I agree that allied recon is dire, especially over the Reich. I could do better in France/Belgium but I'm saving the tactical recon for 1944 when I really want to make sure that certain German formations get their due attention. So you have to treat any bombing result with due caution.
So to the bombing war - with BC I don't think you have any choice but to reduce the Ruhr to rubble (unless you ahistorically switch to day raids), the main thing that slows this is damage (flak and fighter caused) and the axis player doesn't really see that. Other than that, I think I maybe trying to be too clever with 8 AAF and I certainly (see next post) need to pay more attention to the U-Boats. I've now got better fighter cover which helps.
Italy, going in on the Basilicata-Calabria border was an experiment, I tried it in an vs AI game and it worked out ok (you get blocked at the narrow exit point but the AI will block any initial landing). Not sure about it, its not really got me far strategically (though I will be well placed to move north when the front shifts) and it didn't get me any of the German mobile stuff from Sicily (which an invasion lower down might have). It also cost me a lot of effort to keep open the sealanes. So at the moment file it with that classic Scots legal judgement 'not proven' - certainly not sure it would be my gambit of choice.












































































