Page 2 of 4

RE: 1917

Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2020 6:30 pm
by Titanwarrior89
You got that right. [:(]

RE: 1917

Posted: Sun Jan 26, 2020 11:32 pm
by jimi3
Amen. 1975. It was called Mechanized Death.

RE: 1917

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:25 am
by wodin
I enjoyed it despite some misgivings. Soldier doesn't know Forest in French despite being out there at least 6 months. The general plot is abit silly with alot of holes in it. Still I did enjoy it. Though still waiting on a WW1 classic to be made.

RE: 1917

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:56 am
by zakblood
i also enjoyed it, but did think it was one sided and rather a odd story and way it was made made me think it was for one side view point to view and comment on, not a classic by any stretch of the words, so seen better, and much worse, but would recommend it all the same as not that many come out from the period

RE: 1917

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 9:08 am
by Trugrit

I liked the film. There are holes in almost every movie plot. I suspend disbelief to enjoy the movie.

WW1 Message Streamer:
https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/REL28973/

“The lack of ground to air communication in WWI saw all sides use messages dropped from aircraft.
The message bags to which the streamer was attached would have the message inserted and the whole
dropped over the relevant unit or position. The streamer was long and colorful to enable
it to be seen and recovered.”


RE: 1917

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 2:15 pm
by Kuokkanen
ORIGINAL: wodin

Though still waiting on a WW1 classic to be made.
All quiet on the Western Front

RE: 1917

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 2:37 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Trugrit

There are holes in almost every movie plot.
warspite1

I'm glad you added the almost caveat. One would be hard pressed indeed to find any holes in the movie plot for the Michael Bay masterpiece Pearl Harbor.

RE: 1917

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 3:06 pm
by Zorch
ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Trugrit

There are holes in almost every movie plot.
warspite1

I'm glad you added the almost caveat. One would be hard pressed indeed to find any holes in the movie plot for the Michael Bay masterpiece Pearl Harbor.
Warspite! You have named the-movie-that-shall-not-be-named! Chastise yourself.

RE: 1917

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 3:14 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Zorch

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Trugrit

There are holes in almost every movie plot.
warspite1

I'm glad you added the almost caveat. One would be hard pressed indeed to find any holes in the movie plot for the Michael Bay masterpiece Pearl Harbor.
Warspite! You have named the-movie-that-shall-not-be-named! Chastise yourself.
warspite1

This piece of celluloid magic gets such a bad press. I defy you to name even one plot hole.

RE: 1917

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 3:25 pm
by Orm
ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Zorch

ORIGINAL: warspite1


warspite1

I'm glad you added the almost caveat. One would be hard pressed indeed to find any holes in the movie plot for the Michael Bay masterpiece Pearl Harbor.
Warspite! You have named the-movie-that-shall-not-be-named! Chastise yourself.
warspite1

This piece of celluloid magic gets such a bad press. I defy you to name even one plot hole.
So why did Rafe travel to England to fight, if the war hadn't begun yet?

RE: 1917

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 3:28 pm
by RFalvo69
ORIGINAL: Kuokkanen
ORIGINAL: wodin

Though still waiting on a WW1 classic to be made.
All quiet on the Western Front

Hell's Angels
Paths of Glory

RE: 1917

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 3:30 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Zorch



Warspite! You have named the-movie-that-shall-not-be-named! Chastise yourself.
warspite1

This piece of celluloid magic gets such a bad press. I defy you to name even one plot hole.
So why did Rafe travel to England to fight, if the war hadn't begun yet?
warspite1

Rafe heard there was a little contretemps between Germany and Englandsville. He thought he'd pop over to get that sorted before porking some nurse or other... or was it Danny? Who knows?

RE: 1917

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 3:44 pm
by Zorch
ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: warspite1


warspite1

This piece of celluloid magic gets such a bad press. I defy you to name even one plot hole.
So why did Rafe travel to England to fight, if the war hadn't begun yet?
warspite1

Rafe heard there was a little contretemps between Germany and Englandsville. He thought he'd pop over to get that sorted before porking some nurse or other... or was it Danny? Who knows?
Hoe many kills did Rafe have in the Battle of Britain? And why isn't he in the 1969 film?

RE: 1917

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 3:51 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Zorch

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Orm



So why did Rafe travel to England to fight, if the war hadn't begun yet?
warspite1

Rafe heard there was a little contretemps between Germany and Englandsville. He thought he'd pop over to get that sorted before porking some nurse or other... or was it Danny? Who knows?
Hoe many kills did Rafe have in the Battle of Britain? And why isn't he in the 1969 film?
warspite1

147, of which 139 were fighters and 232 bombers. He wasn't depicted in the film due to an inability to find an appropriate actor to play the role. Not until Ben Affleck came of age could anyone even approaching that level of manly, testosterone laden, hunk be found to fill Rafe's shoes.

RE: 1917

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 4:07 pm
by simovitch
ORIGINAL: RFalvo69

ORIGINAL: Kuokkanen
ORIGINAL: wodin

Though still waiting on a WW1 classic to be made.
All quiet on the Western Front

Hell's Angels
Paths of Glory
"The Lost Battalion" was actually much better than I thought it would be. I watched it after visiting the site in the Argonne last October. Fascinating true story and aftermath.

RE: 1917

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 4:27 pm
by balto
Lost Battalion.., now that is a war movie, 7.5 of 10. Meets the scientific equation for war movie; (1) marketed as a war movie, (2) great story about war, and the most important part of the equation, (3) tons of combat and graphic.

RE: 1917

Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 8:42 pm
by RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Orm

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: Zorch



Warspite! You have named the-movie-that-shall-not-be-named! Chastise yourself.
warspite1

This piece of celluloid magic gets such a bad press. I defy you to name even one plot hole.
So why did Rafe travel to England to fight, if the war hadn't begun yet?

Maybe he is referring to Pearl Harbor as a masterpiece of how NOT to do a movie.

RE: 1917

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2020 1:10 am
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: warspite1
Rafe heard there was a little contretemps between Germany and Englandsville. He thought he'd pop over to get that sorted before porking some nurse or other... or was it Danny? Who knows?

Are you suggesting, dear Sir, that Rafe may have been porking Danny?

RE: 1917

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2020 12:20 pm
by Zorch
ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: warspite1
Rafe heard there was a little contretemps between Germany and Englandsville. He thought he'd pop over to get that sorted before porking some nurse or other... or was it Danny? Who knows?

Are you suggesting, dear Sir, that Rafe may have been porking Danny?
[:-]I feel very strongly that far too much time has been wasted discussing TMTSNBM. We should move on to more productive areas, such as the number of forum members who could simultaneously comment on the AB thread.

RE: 1917

Posted: Tue Jan 28, 2020 1:05 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: Zorch

ORIGINAL: Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: warspite1
Rafe heard there was a little contretemps between Germany and Englandsville. He thought he'd pop over to get that sorted before porking some nurse or other... or was it Danny? Who knows?

Are you suggesting, dear Sir, that Rafe may have been porking Danny?
[:-]I feel very strongly that far too much time has been wasted discussing TMTSNBM. We should move on to more productive areas, such as the number of forum members who could simultaneously comment on the AB thread.

Hey, I'm just trying to get to the bottom [fnar fnar] of these allegations.