Page 2 of 3
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 7:52 am
by Ambassador
ORIGINAL: CV10
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
ORIGINAL: btd64
Yes, Red Storm Rising. Thank you Range Joe....GP
No - RSR was a Tom Clancy book about the USSR attacking Europe and in the Atlantic. Red Dawn was the one about Russian Paratroops taking a town in the USA.
I'm pretty sure that Clancy's Red Storm Rising is the book where A-10 come to be known as the Devil's Cross.
At any rate, they're great ground attack planes.
It is so. Red Storm Rising is a great book, and that nickname for the Warthog is spot on. Usually, it’s the first thing coming to my mind every time I see footage of an A-10.
Red Dawn is not a book, but a Hollywood movie with a stupidly improbable premise.
And the A-10 is indeed a great ground attack plane. Err... « flying cannon which also drops bombs »[:D]
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 12:25 pm
by Rusty1961
The plane is obsolete. Drones and other UAVs have rendered manned planes archaic. Time to move on.
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 2:22 pm
by Randy Stead
When you Amis are all done with your A-10s, you've beaten them up and flown them to their last legs, and their fatigue ratings is "99", just sell them to Canada. We are world renown for buying the clapped out, surplus gear from other nations' inventories. Then we spend years and millions/billions repairing them. After that, we put out a tender for new stuff. We then accept the best equipment bid. The opposition says we should have chosen the less expensive stuff and swear that's what they would've done if they were the party in office. Then we have an election and the opposition take office. They then pay expensive cancellation fees and order the less expensive, less capable equipment. There are cost over-runs and delays. When the second rate gear arrives, it ends up being more expensive than the first rate gear, but arrives late and costs more than if we had stuck with the first contract.
Sounds stupid, but that is Canada. Nothing is too bad for our guys and gals in green or blue.
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 2:43 pm
by RhinoDad
The plane is obsolete. Drones and other UAVs have rendered manned planes archaic. Time to move on.
Maybe, but they said the same of air to air cannon and small AA guns on destroyers before Vietnam. That ended up not working so well. So they ended up restoring both as the new technology did not quite work as intended once the real shooting started.
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 2:57 pm
by RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Rusty1961
The plane is obsolete. Drones and other UAVs have rendered manned planes archaic. Time to move on.
Not true.
Sieg Heil, Komrade!
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:05 pm
by Rusty1961
ORIGINAL: RhinoDad
The plane is obsolete. Drones and other UAVs have rendered manned planes archaic. Time to move on.
Maybe, but they said the same of air to air cannon and small AA guns on destroyers before Vietnam. That ended up not working so well. So they ended up restoring both as the new technology did not quite work as intended once the real shooting started.
Maybe? The plane first flew in 1972 and operationally flew 44 years ago.
Obsolete. Almost as laughable as he B-52
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:06 pm
by Rusty1961
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Rusty1961
The plane is obsolete. Drones and other UAVs have rendered manned planes archaic. Time to move on.
Not true.
Sieg Heil, Komrade!
Really? 48 years old and still vibrant? Yeah, okay, I was told the F-35 would replace the A10, F16 and F15. What happened to that? Quit digging.
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:12 pm
by RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Rusty1961
ORIGINAL: RhinoDad
The plane is obsolete. Drones and other UAVs have rendered manned planes archaic. Time to move on.
Maybe, but they said the same of air to air cannon and small AA guns on destroyers before Vietnam. That ended up not working so well. So they ended up restoring both as the new technology did not quite work as intended once the real shooting started.
Maybe? The plane first flew in 1972 and operationally flew 44 years ago.
Obsolete. Almost as laughable as he B-52
Komrade, how old is the fifty caliber Browning machine gun? Where is its replacement?
The B-52 is not laughable.
The DC-3s are still being used.
Run home and get in contact with President Kim.
Sieg Heil, Komrade!
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:15 pm
by RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Rusty1961
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Rusty1961
The plane is obsolete. Drones and other UAVs have rendered manned planes archaic. Time to move on.
Not true.
Sieg Heil, Komrade!
Really? 48 years old and still vibrant? Yeah, okay, I was told the F-35 would replace the A10, F16 and F15. What happened to that? Quit digging.
Komrade, They came and talked to you personally? Wow, you must be special. Say hello to Putin, Komrade.
Komrade, as far as digging, that is how many things are mined.
Komrade, how is your supply of medicine holding out?
Sieg Heil, Komrades!
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:15 pm
by JeffroK
ORIGINAL: Randy Stead
When you Amis are all done with your A-10s, you've beaten them up and flown them to their last legs, and their fatigue ratings is "99", just sell them to Canada. We are world renown for buying the clapped out, surplus gear from other nations' inventories. Then we spend years and millions/billions repairing them. After that, we put out a tender for new stuff. We then accept the best equipment bid. The opposition says we should have chosen the less expensive stuff and swear that's what they would've done if they were the party in office. Then we have an election and the opposition take office. They then pay expensive cancellation fees and order the less expensive, less capable equipment. There are cost over-runs and delays. When the second rate gear arrives, it ends up being more expensive than the first rate gear, but arrives late and costs more than if we had stuck with the first contract.
Sounds stupid, but that is Canada. Nothing is too bad for our guys and gals in green or blue.
You got some good FA-18's from OZ, only a million flying hours, only driven to church on Sunday's.
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:17 pm
by RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: JeffroK
ORIGINAL: Randy Stead
When you Amis are all done with your A-10s, you've beaten them up and flown them to their last legs, and their fatigue ratings is "99", just sell them to Canada. We are world renown for buying the clapped out, surplus gear from other nations' inventories. Then we spend years and millions/billions repairing them. After that, we put out a tender for new stuff. We then accept the best equipment bid. The opposition says we should have chosen the less expensive stuff and swear that's what they would've done if they were the party in office. Then we have an election and the opposition take office. They then pay expensive cancellation fees and order the less expensive, less capable equipment. There are cost over-runs and delays. When the second rate gear arrives, it ends up being more expensive than the first rate gear, but arrives late and costs more than if we had stuck with the first contract.
Sounds stupid, but that is Canada. Nothing is too bad for our guys and gals in green or blue.
You got some good FA-18's from OZ, only a million flying hours, only driven to church on Sunday's.
Canada must be good for recycling things . . . [;)]
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 10:39 pm
by Randy Stead
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Rusty1961
ORIGINAL: RhinoDad
Maybe, but they said the same of air to air cannon and small AA guns on destroyers before Vietnam. That ended up not working so well. So they ended up restoring both as the new technology did not quite work as intended once the real shooting started.
Maybe? The plane first flew in 1972 and operationally flew 44 years ago.
Obsolete. Almost as laughable as he B-52
Komrade, how old is the fifty caliber Browning machine gun? Where is its replacement?
The B-52 is not laughable.
The DC-3s are still being used.
Run home and get in contact with President Kim.
Sieg Heil, Komrade!
There's an air freight outfit not far from me in the Toronto region that uses DC-3s. Old does not mean obsolete. A bullet from any functional firearm of any age is still lethal. The 1911 is over a century old, the human body is much older than that and has not changed much at all.
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 11:38 pm
by Rusty1961
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Rusty1961
ORIGINAL: RhinoDad
Maybe, but they said the same of air to air cannon and small AA guns on destroyers before Vietnam. That ended up not working so well. So they ended up restoring both as the new technology did not quite work as intended once the real shooting started.
Maybe? The plane first flew in 1972 and operationally flew 44 years ago.
Obsolete. Almost as laughable as he B-52
Komrade, how old is the fifty caliber Browning machine gun? Where is its replacement?
The B-52 is not laughable.
The DC-3s are still being used.
Run home and get in contact with President Kim.
Sieg Heil, Komrade!
1. Mr. Nazi quote aficionado; I'm not your "Komrade".
2. B-52s dared not enter Yugo airspace some 20+ years ago. Archai.
3 My father nearly died in a DC in 1943. Shall I do the math for you?
The stupid is strong on this thread.
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sat Jan 23, 2021 11:39 pm
by Rusty1961
ORIGINAL: Randy Stead
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Rusty1961
Maybe? The plane first flew in 1972 and operationally flew 44 years ago.
Obsolete. Almost as laughable as he B-52
Komrade, how old is the fifty caliber Browning machine gun? Where is its replacement?
The B-52 is not laughable.
The DC-3s are still being used.
Run home and get in contact with President Kim.
Sieg Heil, Komrade!
There's an air freight outfit not far from me in the Toronto region that uses DC-3s. Old does not mean obsolete. A bullet from any functional firearm of any age is still lethal. The 1911 is over a century old, the human body is much older than that and has not changed much at all.
So no weapons are obsolete based on your enlightened opinion. Got it.
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2021 12:22 am
by RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Rusty1961
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Rusty1961
Maybe? The plane first flew in 1972 and operationally flew 44 years ago.
Obsolete. Almost as laughable as he B-52
Komrade, how old is the fifty caliber Browning machine gun? Where is its replacement?
The B-52 is not laughable.
The DC-3s are still being used.
Run home and get in contact with President Kim.
Sieg Heil, Komrade!
1. Mr. Nazi quote aficionado; I'm not your "Komrade".
2. B-52s dared not enter Yugo airspace some 20+ years ago. Archai.
3 My father nearly died in a DC in 1943. Shall I do the math for you?
The stupid is strong on this thread.
1) Komrade, who is quoting Nazis? Who is denigrating the USA?[8|]
2) Komrade, there was no "Yugo" airspace some 20+ years ago. At least, not the Jugoslavia that we loved.
3) Yes, the Soviets had DC-3s in 1943. No math needed, Komrade.
Yes, Komrade, you are strong on this thread.
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2021 12:27 am
by RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Rusty1961
ORIGINAL: Randy Stead
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
Komrade, how old is the fifty caliber Browning machine gun? Where is its replacement?
The B-52 is not laughable.
The DC-3s are still being used.
Run home and get in contact with President Kim.
Sieg Heil, Komrade!
There's an air freight outfit not far from me in the Toronto region that uses DC-3s. Old does not mean obsolete. A bullet from any functional firearm of any age is still lethal. The 1911 is over a century old, the human body is much older than that and has not changed much at all.
So no weapons are obsolete based on your enlightened opinion. Got it.
Komrade, a "Brown Bess" loaded, shoved up against your groin, then fired will still do the job.[X(]
Hagel zu Musketen!
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2021 12:26 pm
by Rusty1961
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Rusty1961
ORIGINAL: Randy Stead
There's an air freight outfit not far from me in the Toronto region that uses DC-3s. Old does not mean obsolete. A bullet from any functional firearm of any age is still lethal. The 1911 is over a century old, the human body is much older than that and has not changed much at all.
So no weapons are obsolete based on your enlightened opinion. Got it.
Komrade, a "Brown Bess" loaded, shoved up against your groin, then fired will still do the job.[X(]
Hagel zu Musketen!
Dude, wtf is your malfunction? Stop talking about men's groin.
BFYTW
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2021 12:31 pm
by RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Rusty1961
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Rusty1961
So no weapons are obsolete based on your enlightened opinion. Got it.
Komrade, a "Brown Bess" loaded, shoved up against your groin, then fired will still do the job.[X(]
Hagel zu Musketen!
Dude, wtf is your malfunction? Stop talking about men's groin.
BFYTW
Komrade, does it bother you to think of an "obsolete" weapon being used to injure your groin area?[:'(]
Sieg Heil, Komraden!!
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2021 1:36 pm
by fcooke
Buffs are not obsolete and will outlive B-1s and B-2s, because they are cost efficient and can leverage stand-off weapons. The Air Force has been trying to get rid of the A-10 forever, with the F-35 being claimed as the plane that do everything, but does nothing terribly well, and costs a fortune. And a drone cannot lift that cannon that the A-10 can. And the troops on the ground seem to appreciate the A-10. They do they heavy lifting so that should count for something.
And F-4s came without guns initially. That changed PDQ when missiles were not the be all end all.
And I would fly a DC3/C47 anytime.
Or a 747 (a lot of Buff tech in that plane).
I will now shush before this gets more political.
RE: OT: A-10's in Korea!
Posted: Sun Jan 24, 2021 1:43 pm
by fcooke
On a side note.....my copy of Sieg Heil came from a co-worker when I was still working. Seems it came from her father in law who was a rear-admiral in the USN, passed away, and left a bunch of books to her. Didn't write down his name but hope to find it when I start reading the collection she gifted me.