Page 2 of 9
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Sun Dec 04, 2022 8:34 pm
by hersh08
Shared results on 5950X stock and 7950X stock. Screenshot for the latter below:
Not sure why the benchmark is not seeing my full 64gb RAM in the new 7950x build...
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2022 8:06 pm
by DmitriyBlade
hersh08 wrote: Sun Dec 04, 2022 8:34 pm
7950X stock...
Nice result, could you go full OC?, also could you test with affinity CMO.exe only for one CCX?
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 12:17 am
by WYBaugh

- Screenshot 2022-12-09 191636.jpg (152.81 KiB) Viewed 2875 times
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2022 11:40 pm
by konstpan

- i7-12700K.png (25.9 KiB) Viewed 2842 times
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Sun Dec 11, 2022 12:24 pm
by DmitriyBlade
konstpan wrote: Sat Dec 10, 2022 11:40 pm
i7-12700K.png
How E-cores loaded during test? Fully?
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2022 3:05 am
by madavid0
My results. Final scores are a little bit faster than the scores shown here with the benchmark still running. I'm not sure if any overclocking is taking place so I'll need to check that.

- benchmark.png (95.65 KiB) Viewed 2757 times
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Wed Dec 14, 2022 3:20 am
by madavid0
Showing all virtual cores. Scores are better because this time I waited for the benchmark to complete before taking the screenshot. Also I haven't done any kind of cleanup for running tasks.

- benchmark-2.png (94.94 KiB) Viewed 2754 times
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Thu Dec 15, 2022 3:49 am
by madavid0
To expand on my results. It IS overclocked but only mildly: 50x ALL-CORE for performance cores and 40x all-core on efficiency cores. Either my motherboard doesn't do well with overclocking or I just got unlucky in the silicon roulette. I used to be able to push 51x-47x at first but now trying that results in POST failure.
Also it's interesting how the 7950 results posted by others are so close to the 12700 even though they are very different architectures. That sort of suggests to me that the game engine isn't fully optimized.
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Fri Feb 10, 2023 3:18 am
by TempestII

- 20230902 - CMO Laptop Benchmark.jpg (59.17 KiB) Viewed 2546 times
As my new gaming PC is currently in pieces until all the parts come, I'm on my 2019 Acer Nitro laptop.
Specs:
CMO 1307.3
Windows 11 Home 64 Bit
CPU - I5-8300H (2.3 GHz)
RAM - 16GB (for some reason, CMO only says 8GB)
GPU - GTX 1050TI
Drive - Samsung 860 1TB SSD
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:00 pm
by Rain08
My new build PC
i5-13600K (using MSI Lite load 6)
2x8 GB DDR4 @ 2133 (I've yet to run XMP/OC profiles)
MSI Z790-P DDR4 Wifi

- cmo1.PNG (15.72 KiB) Viewed 2492 times
I just wanna see the results and I'm pretty happy with where my CPU is sitting with others in the sheet.
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:41 pm
by thewood1
I've been curious on how the 13 series intels will perform. I have an i9-13950HX PC on the way in a couple weeks. It'll be interesting to see how it compares to my current 12. I'm always a little skeptical that there is a big difference in intel generations. But so far the 12 and 13s seem to be doing well.
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2023 4:28 am
by Rain08
Reran the benchmark with the CPU at lite load 4 and then increased my memory to 2666. It seems that I'm unlucky when it comes to memory OC'ing so my RAM pairing is quite suboptimal.

- Screenshot (14) (2).png (259.17 KiB) Viewed 2445 times
Additional bits: I'm using an ID Cooling SE-226-XT aRGB and 3x 140mm intake fans with 1x outtake (default fans for Lancool III). With my settings above, I peaked at around 76C and CPU package power peaked at 106W.
thewood1 wrote: Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:41 pm
I've been curious on how the 13 series intels will perform. I have an i9-13950HX PC on the way in a couple weeks. It'll be interesting to see how it compares to my current 12. I'm always a little skeptical that there is a big difference in intel generations. But so far the 12 and 13s seem to be doing well.
It's doing very well. From the initial reviews I'm seeing, the 13950HX seems to perform similarly to the 13600K (which matches the 12700K). So I guess you're seeing what your performance would be my benchmarks now heh. May I ask what laptop you're getting?
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2023 6:38 am
by TempestII
Like Rain08, I've also gone for a 13600K on my new build. It seems like anything better than that is probably a little overkill for gaming alone. While I'm keeping my GPU, (1080TI), everything else will be an upgrade - 32GB of DDR5 RAM, a Z790 motherboard, M2 SSD etc. According to CPU Benchmark site, the 13600K should be circa 60-80% faster than my old I7 6700K so I'm looking forward to seeing how large CMO scenarios run on it.
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2023 9:05 am
by thewood1
I am getting the GT77 Titan with the i9 and the 4090. My work subsidizes almost all of it and replaces it once a year. My old gets passed on to someone else.
I'm currently using the 2022 version with the 12900HX.
As you can see in previous posts, the benchmark is pretty good. My expectation is the 13 series will be slightly faster. I have noticed that 1307.3 seems to run a little slower than 1291.
https://www.matrixgames.com/forums/view ... 5#p5049625
This is my 1307.3 run...

- Screenshot 2023-02-11 214045.jpg (59.85 KiB) Viewed 2410 times
The runs average right around there.
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2023 12:33 am
by kahta
Ryzen 9 5950X 3.4 Ghz
64 GB DDR3600
Windows 10 64 bit Enterprise LTSC
1307.3

- Benchmark Result.PNG (30.59 KiB) Viewed 2333 times
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Sat Feb 18, 2023 11:28 pm
by thewood1
Got a new 17" laptop with an i9-13980HX. The second thing I did with it after uninstalling Norton...

- Screenshot 2023-02-18 105627.png (36.36 KiB) Viewed 2249 times
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2023 2:02 am
by JRyan
Well my PC is around 10 years old, so I thought I would benchmark it for data. I will be getting a new one soon. This was with a fresh install of CMO.
EDIT - that was SO bad that I wanted to see if it repeated. It did not, still sucks but better.
TEST#2

TEST #1

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Wed Mar 22, 2023 1:57 am
by JRyan
Ok New Laptop...
New Benchmarks.
Test #1 - 1307.1
Test #2 1307.3
Yeah, this was a good upgrade. I will reinstall all the addons and then give her a whirl. I have more setting up to do though, but yeah it is WAY faster now.
I will look into TACVIEW as well.
Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2023 12:55 am
by JRyan
After installing tacview, the GPU was 100%. So I tried it without GPU.
The MSI turned it on anyway. That makes me think the intel graphics would have had issues.

Re: Benchmarking CPU's in Command Modern Operations
Posted: Sat Mar 25, 2023 4:12 am
by artao5
I figured I'd throw in some old hardware here. Do I win the "Slowest System" award. LOL

Incidentally, I have 16 gigs of DDR3 1333 RAM. Not sure what's up with the 0 RAM thing.
