Re: CVE question
Posted: Wed Nov 20, 2024 6:35 pm
No, the aircraft are fully assembled and ready to go once they are landed. You can take 2X the carrier complement and you can have multiple air units (which you cannot do on an xAK or even an AKV). Some of the CVEs coming out of Portland or Seattle already have 2X aircraft loaded as they are intended as replenishment aircraft for the carrier fleet.PaxMondo wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 4:08 am Well, yeah. But would you waste a CVE as an xAK? Maybe the allies can afford that, but I know I never would ever consider it. I mean I'm pretty sure when you overload the CVE with AC they unload damaged and you have to wait those turns for them to repair, right?
The best part of using the CVE to transport aircraft is that they can take off and land at a land base. That way they can get to a land base in a contested area without risking the ships carrying the air unit. If the aircraft is carrier capable, then the air unit can fly to another carrier which includes the replenishment groups flying replacement aircraft.BBfanboy wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 7:59 amNo, the aircraft are fully assembled and ready to go once they are landed. You can take 2X the carrier complement and you can have multiple air units (which you cannot do on an xAK or even an AKV). Some of the CVEs coming out of Portland or Seattle already have 2X aircraft loaded as they are intended as replenishment aircraft for the carrier fleet.PaxMondo wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 4:08 am Well, yeah. But would you waste a CVE as an xAK? Maybe the allies can afford that, but I know I never would ever consider it. I mean I'm pretty sure when you overload the CVE with AC they unload damaged and you have to wait those turns for them to repair, right?
So this appears to be an allied CVE feature. As IJ, if I attempt to fly more than the CVE AC limit I get this message:RangerJoe wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 12:55 pmThe best part of using the CVE to transport aircraft is that they can take off and land at a land base. That way they can get to a land base in a contested area without risking the ships carrying the air unit. If the aircraft is carrier capable, then the air unit can fly to another carrier which includes the replenishment groups flying replacement aircraft.BBfanboy wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 7:59 amNo, the aircraft are fully assembled and ready to go once they are landed. You can take 2X the carrier complement and you can have multiple air units (which you cannot do on an xAK or even an AKV). Some of the CVEs coming out of Portland or Seattle already have 2X aircraft loaded as they are intended as replenishment aircraft for the carrier fleet.PaxMondo wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 4:08 am Well, yeah. But would you waste a CVE as an xAK? Maybe the allies can afford that, but I know I never would ever consider it. I mean I'm pretty sure when you overload the CVE with AC they unload damaged and you have to wait those turns for them to repair, right?
The best use (in my opinion) for the Long Island is to carry US Naval Infantry (US Marine) air units so they can fly to a base without risking any ships more than is necessary. This includes the first Corsair which is not carrier capable. Of course, the Long Island could also fly US Army, US Navy, and Allied air units as well. The second best and probably the more common use (in my opinion) is to fly smaller air units for convoy ASW and a small CAP against Glens. These air units would also be undergoing training to become carrier trained.
Don't fly them to the aircraft carrier, you have to load them either to a docked carrier in a task force or load them onto the disbanded carrier in a base.PaxMondo wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 2:14 pmSo this appears to be an allied CVE feature. As IJ, if I attempt to fly more than the CVE AC limit I get this message:RangerJoe wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 12:55 pmThe best part of using the CVE to transport aircraft is that they can take off and land at a land base. That way they can get to a land base in a contested area without risking the ships carrying the air unit. If the aircraft is carrier capable, then the air unit can fly to another carrier which includes the replenishment groups flying replacement aircraft.BBfanboy wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 7:59 am
No, the aircraft are fully assembled and ready to go once they are landed. You can take 2X the carrier complement and you can have multiple air units (which you cannot do on an xAK or even an AKV). Some of the CVEs coming out of Portland or Seattle already have 2X aircraft loaded as they are intended as replenishment aircraft for the carrier fleet.
The best use (in my opinion) for the Long Island is to carry US Naval Infantry (US Marine) air units so they can fly to a base without risking any ships more than is necessary. This includes the first Corsair which is not carrier capable. Of course, the Long Island could also fly US Army, US Navy, and Allied air units as well. The second best and probably the more common use (in my opinion) is to fly smaller air units for convoy ASW and a small CAP against Glens. These air units would also be undergoing training to become carrier trained.
Warning Screenshot.jpg
and if I follow through, only 5 additional AC will load. Now, maybe it is because of the version I am running, 1108r9, but I don't think so.
version Screenshot.jpg
If I disband the CVE into port, I can then overload it, but the AC added are all damaged.
So, you sneaky allies have ANOTHER advantage over the poor IJ ....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
As noted above, disbanded, they will load damaged. Docked, same result. Can't overload IJ CVE's ...RangerJoe wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 2:57 pmDon't fly them to the aircraft carrier, you have to load them either to a docked carrier in a task force or load them onto the disbanded carrier in a base.PaxMondo wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 2:14 pmSo this appears to be an allied CVE feature. As IJ, if I attempt to fly more than the CVE AC limit I get this message:RangerJoe wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 12:55 pm
The best part of using the CVE to transport aircraft is that they can take off and land at a land base. That way they can get to a land base in a contested area without risking the ships carrying the air unit. If the aircraft is carrier capable, then the air unit can fly to another carrier which includes the replenishment groups flying replacement aircraft.
The best use (in my opinion) for the Long Island is to carry US Naval Infantry (US Marine) air units so they can fly to a base without risking any ships more than is necessary. This includes the first Corsair which is not carrier capable. Of course, the Long Island could also fly US Army, US Navy, and Allied air units as well. The second best and probably the more common use (in my opinion) is to fly smaller air units for convoy ASW and a small CAP against Glens. These air units would also be undergoing training to become carrier trained.
Warning Screenshot.jpg
and if I follow through, only 5 additional AC will load. Now, maybe it is because of the version I am running, 1108r9, but I don't think so.
version Screenshot.jpg
If I disband the CVE into port, I can then overload it, but the AC added are all damaged.
So, you sneaky allies have ANOTHER advantage over the poor IJ ....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
On an aircraft carrier, those "damaged" aircraft can be repaired . . .PaxMondo wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 4:02 pmAs noted above, disbanded, they will load damaged. Docked, same result. Can't overload IJ CVE's ...RangerJoe wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 2:57 pmDon't fly them to the aircraft carrier, you have to load them either to a docked carrier in a task force or load them onto the disbanded carrier in a base.PaxMondo wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 2:14 pm
So this appears to be an allied CVE feature. As IJ, if I attempt to fly more than the CVE AC limit I get this message:
Warning Screenshot.jpg
and if I follow through, only 5 additional AC will load. Now, maybe it is because of the version I am running, 1108r9, but I don't think so.
version Screenshot.jpg
If I disband the CVE into port, I can then overload it, but the AC added are all damaged.
So, you sneaky allies have ANOTHER advantage over the poor IJ ....![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Dirty, cheating allies!!! Always taking advantage of poor, defenseless IJ!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
EDIT
So, I just tried with allies, and also cannot do it. Must be my version, but surprised because 1108r9 should be the same as the last (good old) version.
![]()
![]()
![]()
So, I am doing it correctly? Ok. That helps a TON!! Thank you!!!RangerJoe wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 10:32 pm On an aircraft carrier, those "damaged" aircraft can be repaired . . .
But the Japanese can increase production of their aircraft while the Allies can't. It is just so unfair for the Allies. The Allies can only keep older aircraft factories producing the old models of aircraft, turn off completely the production of aircraft, turn off the HI and LI producing supplies without every being able to increase the HI and LI factories. They can only repair the damaged industries, oil, and resources. The Allies can't increase the factory size. The factories that are lost may be recaptured but every time that the factories change owners, they are reduced in half. So if the base only changes hands twice, the factories are reduced by one fourth.PaxMondo wrote: Fri Nov 22, 2024 1:19 amSo, I am doing it correctly? Ok. That helps a TON!! Thank you!!!RangerJoe wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 10:32 pm On an aircraft carrier, those "damaged" aircraft can be repaired . . .
So, as long as your trip is 5 days or so and the planes are SR1, they will be repaired when you arrive. But, as the IJ with all of our mid and late war SR3, SR4, and SR5 planes, you would have to sail around for a month or more to repair all of them. So, again, you evil allies and your tricky tricks that the poor benighted IJ cannot use!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()