Re: What info would a sub actually know?
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2025 4:57 pm
As a sum up:
You deleted the P-18 Spoon Rest radar out of the SA-2 Guideline sensors
You attached the Spoon Rest radar to another side: "EYES"
Interesting results!
I also placed a standard CMO SA-2 Guideline facility (with only the Spoon Rest operating) in your example scenario and there the radar track was more realistic, with speed and altitude.
I was thinking about placing zones around SAM sites with events triggering missions but I like this idea of yours about comms.
Both are still quite some work.
But why is there no speed and altitude in your setup?
Here is the same setup of thewood1 plus the standard CMO. Compare this result:
I updated your scenario with a standard CMO SA-2 in another side (standard CMO) to see it for yourself:
You deleted the P-18 Spoon Rest radar out of the SA-2 Guideline sensors
You attached the Spoon Rest radar to another side: "EYES"
Interesting results!
I also placed a standard CMO SA-2 Guideline facility (with only the Spoon Rest operating) in your example scenario and there the radar track was more realistic, with speed and altitude.
I was thinking about placing zones around SAM sites with events triggering missions but I like this idea of yours about comms.
Both are still quite some work.
But why is there no speed and altitude in your setup?
Here is the same setup of thewood1 plus the standard CMO. Compare this result:
I updated your scenario with a standard CMO SA-2 in another side (standard CMO) to see it for yourself: