Matrix Games Forums

I’ve fixed the date issue V1.71. Regarding the mission end, I’ve decided to let the player navigate back manually: SUCCESS CONDITION: The MH-47G must proceed to the USS Iwo Jima and enter the recovery pattern/zone.

To be honest, I couldn't find the specific Trigger or Lua code to trigger the mission end exactly upon landing, so I prefer this approach. If anyone knows the proper method for that, I would be extremely grateful for the help so I can implement it and keep learning from this great game.

Just to clarify: while this is my first 'official' scenario for CMO, I have experience creating content for other simulators. I'm open to any suggestions to make the mission more engaging or fun.

Also, I hope the issue regarding the ships' EMCON states gets resolved soon. Does anyone know if this has already been reported?

Ready for CMO Workshop?

Correcaminos wrote: Tue Jan 06, 2026 10:45 am I’ve fixed the date issue V1.71. Regarding the mission end, I’ve decided to let the player navigate back manually: SUCCESS CONDITION: The MH-47G must proceed to the USS Iwo Jima and enter the recovery pattern/zone.

To be honest, I couldn't find the specific Trigger or Lua code to trigger the mission end exactly upon landing, so I prefer this approach. If anyone knows the proper method for that, I would be extremely grateful for the help so I can implement it and keep learning from this great game.

Just to clarify: while this is my first 'official' scenario for CMO, I have experience creating content for other simulators. I'm open to any suggestions to make the mission more engaging or fun.

Also, I hope the issue regarding the ships' EMCON states gets resolved soon. Does anyone know if this has already been reported?

Ready for CMO Workshop?

Thanks for you efforts. It looks promising.

Re ship's EMCON state: if you mean what I have been discussing before, I took Nikel's advice and change posture towards Venezuela to Unfriendly, until the time I want the fireworks on. The reaction seems to be caused by a combination of Emissions detection by the Sentinel and the IR sensors on some of the ships - and last but not least, the initial close proximity of the US ships to Venezuela. I am used to position carrier groups at distances of 300-500 nm from land and less than 100 nm in this scenario felt strange in any case

Based on my research, the USS Gerald R. Ford should not be closer than 350nm to the coast for security reasons, while the USS Iwo Jima needs to stay at least 150nm away to conduct special operations. I need to go over your suggestions and take a look at the Lua code for unit randomization

maybe change the mission name to "Absolute Resolve" ?

This was the location of the armada according to Riley Mellen.




The Gerald Ford spotted the day 3 according to Nexus_osintx.





I see nothing in a sea of clouds

You may try by yourself to find all the stuff, direct link to the zone of the Iwo Jima, Sentinel-2, day 3 of January.


https://browser.dataspace.copernicus.eu ... ode=SINGLE

Operation Absolute Resolve – Changelog V1.8

1. General & Immersion Updates

Rebranding: Mission name updated to the real-world operation title: ABSOLUTE RESOLVE (Thanks to Benefan).

Mission Timeline: Advanced the mission start time to provide players with a proper window for tactical planning and pre-flight preparations.

Multimedia: Integrated a briefing video into the mission description to enhance operational atmosphere.

2. Naval & ASW (Anti-Submarine Warfare)

Gerald R. Ford Standoff: The carrier has been relocated to 350nm off the coast. This ensures the CSG operates from a more realistic and secure zone, preventing automated weapon systems from engaging littoral targets prematurely.

Sea Control Patrol: Implemented a new patrol logic for submarines, including the randomized appearance of the S32 Caribe (Type 209) in the AO.

Increased Difficulty: Randomized all biological and neutral subsurface contacts across the Caribbean. Contact classification and sonar analysis will now be significantly more challenging.

3. Air Order of Battle (Air OOB)

OPFOR Threats: Added new Venezuelan Combat Air Patrols (CAP) featuring F-16A and K-8W airframes.

BLUFOR Assets: Added F-22 Raptors and B-1B Lancers at NAS Roosevelt Roads to reflect the true scale and immersion of the operation.

4. Added Credits & Acknowledgments in Description

Special thanks to Nikel and KnightPawn for their invaluable collaboration in playtesting, technical feedback, and the implementation of new mission elements.

I hope you all enjoy this new version. Good hunting!

Nikel wrote: Tue Jan 06, 2026 6:56 pm This was the location of the armada according to Riley Mellen.

The Gerald Ford spotted the day 3 according to Nexus_osintx.

I see nothing in a sea of clouds

You may try by yourself to find all the stuff, direct link to the zone of the Iwo Jima, Sentinel-2, day 3 of January.

I saw this post after pushing v1.8, but it looks like I got it spot on! We fixed the 'instant' missile launches at T-0. We decided against adding satellite coverage, though—we didn't want to make it too easy for you.

v1.8. The scenario ends when it is started.

The start of the scenario is 2 of January.

The commercial fishing ships are hostile now. Narco?

Nikel wrote: Tue Jan 06, 2026 9:06 pm v1.8. The scenario ends when it is started.

The start of the scenario is 2 of January.

The commercial fishing ships are hostile now. Narco?

Oops, error in the uploaded file—all fixed now! Having a couple of 'narco-boats' isn't a bad idea, maybe in next version if there is one,

Correcaminos wrote: Tue Jan 06, 2026 9:35 pm

Nikel wrote: Tue Jan 06, 2026 9:06 pm v1.8. The scenario ends when it is started.

The start of the scenario is 2 of January.

The commercial fishing ships are hostile now. Narco?

Oops, error in the uploaded file—all fixed now! Having a couple of 'narco-boats' isn't a bad idea, maybe in next version if there is one,

I believe the start time and current time should be aligned, or else the time window for execution seems narrow especially if one wants to change the loadouts of the carrier air assets

I'll align those schedules this afternoon and extend the mission duration to 18 hours. I will also adjust a couple of other things we discussed (like the sub spawn rate). All details are important

congratulation!

i had a look on it and tested

some ideas/suggestions for you:

it was a big operation with many forces in background

so:

wishes/suggestions

- get a Pair of B-52H with Loadout "ADM-160C MALD-J [Stand-In OECM]" additional

- get a Pair of KC-46A Pegasus additional

- get one MQ-4C Triton UAV additonal

- add one LCS to the "Imo Jima" Group
maybe LCS 2 Independence - 2017


- add one submarine near the coastline caracas
maybe SSN 23 Jimmy Carter [Seawolf Class]


Set up Weather with "random" or
Weather witd partially clouds
full clouds - in a middle range of hight or so
actual there is no Wind / no Rain / no Cloud



changing start Time - 8 hours before -
Loadouts for helicopters and aircraft on Carrier F/A-18 /F-35 and so to "reserve"
then everyone have to choose - which loadout to use

CHANGELOG v1.94

SCENARIO CONFIGURATION

Start Time: Modified to 02/01/2026 22:00Z.

Duration: Extended to 21 hours.

Weather: Original ideal conditions maintained (optimal for laser designation).

Technical Adjustment: Initial zoom level adjusted to focus directly on the AO.

BLUEFOR FORCES

New Naval Units:

USS Vermont (SSN-792): Virginia-class Block IV submarine added as advanced escort.

USS Fort Lauderdale (LPD-28): Integrated with 2x LCACs.

USS Savannah (LCS-28): Littoral escort.

Renaming: CG-62 updated to USS Robert Smalls.

New Air Units:

CVN-78 Ford: Integrated F-35C, F/A-18E Block III,MQ-25 Stingray...

Iwo Jima: MH-60R, F35B,...

Air Base (Puerto Rico): Added support units including B-1B Lancer, support drones, and E-2D Advanced Hawkeye.

Naval Detachments: MH-60R/S, AH-1Z, and MQ-8C added to LPD and LCS.

Logistics: Units set to Readying status. Mk54 LHT standardized. Magazine corrections applied.

OPPOSITION (VENEZUELA)

Coastal Defense: Added coastal radars and anti-surface defense units along the coastline.

Ground Forces: Added armed infantry units deployed at Fuerte Tiuna.

Naval & Air Forces: Modified CAPs for higher reactivity; added new enemy surface units.

NEUTRAL & ENVIRONMENT

Civil Traffic: Added civilian surface units (merchant/fishing).

Dynamic Environment: Random probability for a second Venezuelan submarine and false biological contacts.

TECHNICAL FIXES & BUG REPORT

Bug Fix / Report: Implemented key workaround for interface inputs. I detected a bug regarding the initial map position saving: if adjusted only via mouse, the position is not saved correctly; using map movement keys is required. Is this a known reported issue?

FUTURE ROADMAP

Version 2.0 Notice: A "Global Conflict" version (v2.0) is planned, expanding combat zones nationwide. It will integrate the current surgical op and add heavy assets like B-52s. But for this, I will release a separate GLOBAL mission apart from this one

FEEDBACK:

Do you think we should adjust the opposition of the Venezuelan forces based on their current status?

final tested 1.80

SIDE: VENEZUELA
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
6x 23mm ZU-23-2 + SA-24 Grinch [ZOM-1-4]
2x A/C Hangar (2x Large Aircraft)
15x A/C Hangar (2x Medium Aircraft)
22x A/C Hangar (2x Small Aircraft)
1x A/C Hangar (6x Large Aircraft)
3x Ammo Pad
1x Ammo Revetment
2x Ammo Shelter
2x AvGas (40k Liter Tank)
6x BMP-3 [AT-10 Stabber] IFV
12x BTR-80A APC
1x F 21 Mariscal Sucre [Lupo]
2x F-16A Falcon
4x F-16A Falcon
2x K-8W Karakorum
1x PO 11 Guaiqueri [Avante 2200 Combatant]
2x Radar (Bill Board B [9S15M Obzor])
1x Radar (China JY-27A)
1x Radar (China JYL-1)
2x Radar (High Screen B [9S19M2 Imbir])
2x Radar (Snow Drift [9S18M1])
1x Radar (Spoon Rest D [P-18])
6x SA-17 Grizzly [9A310M1-2] TELAR
3x SA-17 Grizzly [9A39M1-2] LLV
8x SA-23a Gladiator [9A83M] TELAR
4x SA-23a Gladiator [9A84] LLV
4x SA-23b Giant [9A82M] TELAR
2x SA-23b Giant [9A85] LLV
3x SA-24 Grinch [9K338 Igla-S] MANPADS
4x SA-3c Goa Twin Rail [Pechora-2M, MZKT-8022]
3x SA-7a Grail [9K32 Strela-2] MANPADS
8x Su-30MK2 Flanker G
2x Vehicle (Grill Pan [9S32M])
1x Vehicle (Low Blow [SNR-125])
1x Vehicle (Spoon Rest D [P-18])


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
3x 127mm/54 OTO Melara Compact HECVT
5x 35mm/79 Oerlikon Millennium GDM-008 AHEAD Burst [24 rnds]
8x 40mm/70 Twin Breda Compact Burst [32 rnds]
5x 76mm/62 Super Rapido HE Burst [2 rnds]
16x Aspide
2x Chimera Chaff/Flare Seduction Round
6x Generic Chaff Salvo [5x Cartridges]
6x Otomat Mk2 Mod I
2x Python 4
49x SA-17 Grizzly [9M317]
47x SA-23a Gladiator [9M83M]
21x SA-24 Grinch [9M342]
8x SA-3c Goa [5V27DE]
1x SA-7a Grail [9M32]
2x SCLAR Chaff



SIDE: EEUU
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------
3x MH-60L Blackhawk DAP


EXPENDITURES:
------------------
20x AGM-114K Hellfire II
16x AGM-154A JSOW [145 x BLU-97/B Dual Purpose]
16x AGM-154C-1 JSOW [BROACH]
45x AGM-158B JASSM-ER
2x AGM-84D Harpoon IC
6x AGM-88E AARGM
16x AIM-120D AMRAAM P3I.4
36x AIM-260 JATM
27x AN/SSQ-53F DIFAR
25x AN/SSQ-62E DICASS
231x HYDRA 70mm Rocket
16x RGM-109C Tomahawk Blk III TLAM-C
110x RGM-109E Tomahawk Blk IV TACTOM
3x RIM-116C RAM Blk II
1x RIM-174A ERAM SM-6 Blk I Dual I



SIDE: Nature
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------



SIDE: CIVIL
===========================================================

LOSSES:
-------------------------------


EXPENDITURES:
------------------




_________________________


01.03.2026 08:17: Score changed from 0 to 75. Reason: S-300VM Radar Destroyed.

01.03.2026 08:18: Score changed from 75 to 150. Reason: S-300VM Radar Destroyed.

01.03.2026 08:57: Score changed from 150 to 200. Reason: Enemy radar neutralized.

01.03.2026 10:30: Score changed from 200 to 0. Reason: CRITICAL FAILURE: Transport Helo Down.

01.03.2026 10:32: Score changed from 0 to -200. Reason: CRITICAL FAILURE: Transport Helo Down.

01.03.2026 10:32: Score changed from -200 to -400. Reason: CRITICAL FAILURE: Transport Helo Down.

01.03.2026 11:52: Score changed from -400 to -150. Reason: Objective Kingmaker Secured. Package ready for extraction.

01.03.2026 12:20: Score changed from -150 to -85. Reason: Chinook recovered safely. Mission Success.


losses because of helo which like to refuel at wide distance - going out of fuel;

Hi Benefant, thanks for the feedback on the MH-60L losses!
​I’ve analyzed the situation. The issue is indeed the range/endurance of the DAPs. To bring them back safely, it is mandatory to use the MC-130J Commando II included in the OOB. You need to set it in a low-altitude orbit midway between the fleet and the coast to act as a FARP/Tanker for the return leg.

I'm updating the briefing to explicitly emphasize the need for the MC-130J refueling track
I am significantly reducing the point penalty for helicopter losses.(-75p)

​I will upload the updated file shortly once these tweaks are done.

I would not reduce the points lost per helo.

There are more than enough assets to do the job safely.

If just one helo was shot down, the operation would have complicated a lot with a rescue effort, remember Mogadishu, and who knows what could have happened then. It is evident the objective was a clean and fast capture.

It is not the same though, shot down over Caracas, that lost in the sea due to lack of fuel.

Thanks, Nikel! I just need to confirm if the MC-130 is performing its role correctly. Also, I need to update the briefing to emphasize the necessity of its support during the operation in a more... narrative way

Correcaminos wrote: Thu Jan 08, 2026 8:59 am Thanks, Nikel! I just need to confirm if the MC-130 is performing its role correctly. Also, I need to update the briefing to emphasize the necessity of its support during the operation in a more... narrative way

Yes, they can be refueled with the Commando II, I have tested it.

I have reported a fuse error that appears in your last version.

Regarding the position and composition of the naval groups.

The map posted above looks more realistic to me, even though we are not sure if it is true.

The ARG in your last version is not protected by surface ships and the carrier group is too far away.

Not even a detached destroyer nearby?


Also the use of Tomahawks, I think has not been reported in the operation.

In previous versions of the scenario you could do the SEAD/DEAD operation nearly just with them because you have many missiles available.

However they were not used, probably too expensive for the role and also because the US wanted to test the LUCAS or similar drones.

I would reduce the possibility of using the Tomahawks and also add Shahed launchers to the ARG, the LUCAS is not available in the db.

It was commented by Lumiere in this thread with a TWZ link.

https://forums.matrixgames.com/viewtopi ... 8#p5256798

Hi Nikel, thank you for the link and the detailed analysis. You are spot on regarding the operational doctrine. I've read the thread and I'm implementing your suggestions for the next hotfix/update:
​1. ARG Escort (The "Fireworks" Fix):
You are right, the LPD and Iwo Jima were too exposed. I am adding an Arleigh Burke DDG to the Amphibious Group for close protection.
​Technical Note: To solve the issue of the DDG engaging Venezuelan F-16s immediately upon scenario start (which ruins the infiltration phase), I will set the DDG's Air-WRA to "HOLD / Self-Defense". It will be there for ASW/ASuW protection, but won't start WW3 automatically unless the player authorizes it or it is fired upon.
​2. Tomahawks (TLAM) Removed:
Agreed. Using massive TLAM strikes trivializes the SEAD challenge. I have removed them from the magazines. This forces the player to rely on air power and the new drone tech, as discussed in the article.
​3. Project LUCAS (Drone Swarm):
Since the "LUCAS" system isn't in the DB, I'm following your advice. I'm adding 50x Shahed-136s (renamed as "LUCAS Swarm Payload") to the USS Iwo Jima.
​Tactical use: They will act as proxies for the swarming capability intended to saturate the Venezuelan S-300s. Do you think 50 units is a balanced number for the current IADS, or should I push for more?
​Thanks again for the feedback, it's really shaping the realism of the scenario! Wait for upload this night.