Re: Nitpicking Scenario
Posted: Fri Apr 10, 2026 11:28 pm
Australia
Cities to the end of railroad lines.
Augusta (48,150) with Port and Port Build of one and AF Build of six.
Buckleboo (73,158) with AF Build of six
Injune (91,155) with AF Build of six
Belgrave (83,170) with AF Build of six
I think your allocation of a L6 airfield is a guess, in as much as with effort 90% of Australia could be turned into a L6 airfield. As the airfield level includes infrastructure I would suggest a L4 maximum which allows limited 4E bomber usage.
Dont forget you can build an airfield past is posted level so you would be better making these a L1 which could be built to L4, otherwise you are setting up a major airfield structure that didnt exist.
Buckleboo was at the end of a narrow gauge rail, probably better to remove the rail.
Belgrave is only 36km from Melbourne, are you sure this shouldnt be either Warburton or Healesville?
Warburton would not have an airfield (maybe a L1) and Healesville would rate a L4.
Cities to the end of railroad lines.
Augusta (48,150) with Port and Port Build of one and AF Build of six.
Buckleboo (73,158) with AF Build of six
Injune (91,155) with AF Build of six
Belgrave (83,170) with AF Build of six
I think your allocation of a L6 airfield is a guess, in as much as with effort 90% of Australia could be turned into a L6 airfield. As the airfield level includes infrastructure I would suggest a L4 maximum which allows limited 4E bomber usage.
Dont forget you can build an airfield past is posted level so you would be better making these a L1 which could be built to L4, otherwise you are setting up a major airfield structure that didnt exist.
Buckleboo was at the end of a narrow gauge rail, probably better to remove the rail.
Belgrave is only 36km from Melbourne, are you sure this shouldnt be either Warburton or Healesville?
Warburton would not have an airfield (maybe a L1) and Healesville would rate a L4.