Page 2 of 2
RE: PBEM? Why Not?
Posted: Wed Aug 24, 2005 8:05 pm
by JeF
ORIGINAL: sterckxe
That beta-tester would be me - I'm hardly undercover though [;)]
I know. [;)]
Sorry for the poor choice of word due to lack of time combined with lack of mastering of the English language. But goal is attained : you posted your insane ideas here.
Now your procedure works if players :
1. trust each other : there is no password whatsoever,
2. can cope with the lack of replay : you're blind half of the time.
From my limited experience, security and replay (multiple replays) are two fundamentals of modern PBEM. And this is not trivial to implement correctly.
Joss, thanks for sharing your experience as a busy wargamer clearing his schedule for some online play, ... and inventing some insane ways to play this game. [:D]
Take care,
JeF.
RE: PBEM? Why Not?
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 3:09 am
by Golf33
ORIGINAL: JeF
Now your procedure works if players :
1. trust each other : there is no password whatsoever,
HTTR multiplayer savegames are password-protected.
Regards
33
RE: PBEM? Why Not?
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 11:40 am
by sterckxe
ORIGINAL: JeF
to lack of time combined with lack of mastering of the English language.
We kunnen natuurlijk in het Nederlands beginnen te posten om iedereen hier te pesten
ORIGINAL: JeF
But goal is attained : you posted your insane ideas here.
I've got another dozen if anyone is interested - whenever you need a deluge of bad ideas I'm you man
ORIGINAL: JeF
Now your procedure works if players :
1. trust each other : there is no password whatsoever,
2. can cope with the lack of replay : you're blind half of the time.
Well, it was a proposition for a "quick fix" of the no-pbem situation. As Steve indicated password protection could be implemented pretty easily.
As to the lack of replay : depends on how you look at it - it essentially simulates the "painfully realistic" setting *real* commanders were facing.
In other words it's not a lack of a feature, but a very realistic feature implementation
Greetz,
Eddy Sterckx
RE: PBEM? Why Not?
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:54 pm
by JeF
ORIGINAL: sterckxe
We kunnen natuurlijk in het Nederlands beginnen te posten om iedereen hier te pesten
Ik ook. Ik ben franstalig. [;)]
JeF.
RE: PBEM? Why Not?
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2005 9:44 pm
by sterckxe
ORIGINAL: JeF
Ik ook. Ik ben franstalig. [;)]
Ah, un vrai grognard [;)]
Greetz,
Eddy Sterckx
RE: PBEM? Why Not?
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 9:48 am
by JJKettunen
Dutch doesn't seem to be that hard language after all. Jef is a French-speaking Belgian, and so a true grognard. Did I get it right? What do I win? [:D]
RE: PBEM? Why Not?
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 10:24 am
by JJKettunen
Then again, it must be Flemish, so I didn't win anything. [:(]
RE: PBEM? Why Not?
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 10:54 am
by sterckxe
ORIGINAL: Keke
Dutch doesn't seem to be that hard language after all. Jef is a French-speaking Belgian, and so a true grognard. Did I get it right? What do I win? [:D]
1) Dutch looks/is easy, as it's the second closest language to English (Frisian is no 1) - Flemish as a language doesn't exist, it's the groupname for a collection of Lower Franconian languages/dialects incomprehensible to all but the natives, but it's also commonly used to denote the version of Dutch as spoken in Flanders. It has about the same relation to standard Dutch as American English has to Oxford English.
2) JeF is a grognard
Greetz,
Eddy Sterckx
RE: PBEM? Why Not?
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 11:15 am
by JJKettunen
ORIGINAL: sterckxe
1) Dutch looks/is easy, as it's the second closest language to English (Frisian is no 1) - Flemish as a language doesn't exist, it's the groupname for a collection of Lower Franconian languages/dialects incomprehensible to all but the natives, but it's also commonly used to denote the version of Dutch as spoken in Flanders. It has about the same relation to standard Dutch as American English has to Oxford English.
That was educational, thank you. [:)]
RE: PBEM? Why Not?
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:34 pm
by CriticalMass
ORIGINAL: sterckxe
2) JeF is a grognard
They cloned Grognard!!!
RE: PBEM? Why Not?
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 12:37 pm
by Arjuna
ORIGINAL: CriticalMass
They cloned Grognard!!!
[:D]
That may be harder than you think![;)]
RE: PBEM? Why Not?
Posted: Fri Aug 26, 2005 6:40 pm
by JeF
This thread has gone way too far from the original subject, but as some insinuasions are directed to me, I have to respond.
ORIGINAL: sterckxe
2) JeF is a grognard
I was going to argue, then I had a look at the definition (
Wikipedia ) and I have to agree, especialy the 'grumbler' part. [;)]
ORIGINAL: CriticalMass
They cloned Grognard!!!
I'm not a clone ! I'm the original !
JeF comes from the initials of my real name ... :
[center]
Jango Fett
[/center]
Take Care,
[:D]
JeF.
RE: PBEM? Why Not?
Posted: Sat Aug 27, 2005 3:26 am
by Grognard
Frankly, I was astonished the name was still available when I registered..... [X(]