Matrix Games Forums

Just ran the latest scen file posted and the ViCondition has failed to evaluate, again.

It looks like it may not have been removed as previously stated. [:(]






Saved game file posted to StrategyZoneOnline.

Sorry about that Herman my error, at work at the moment then on a German FF overnight working up in our areas so I will upload the correct one sometime tomorrow evening[:)]

Hi Herman the Scenario has now been uploaded[:)]

Scenario ViCond still does not evaluate correctly. [:(]







SZO file archives - Home of the Harpoon3 PlayersDB

FilesOfScenShare

HarpGamer.com - Home of the HCDB.



Saved game posted at Xtreme-Gamer

The scenario has now been fixed and uploaded the VC should trigger I hope, ANW VC are twitchy I think[:)]

Instead of 'hoping' things would work, I tested, again, and it does not work.

Go ahead and fix it Herman [&o]Be part of the solution for a change [8D]

[Deleted by Admins]

I'm always willing to help those who ask for it.  But, since none has been solicited here, I won't be 'forcing' my assistance on anyone.  [/align]  [/align] Instead, a scenario is repeatedly presented as ready for play.  So, I'll keep (trying) to play it.[/align]

OK Herman give me a solution , go into scen edit and fix the problem then email me it[:)] and for anybody else you can give me a solution too, as it is my first scenario built using 3.7.1 beta the VCs take alot of getting used too, I am trying as Herman knows to sort out the VC problem ie 2 VC of damage on the same level after compisite both must be achieved to achive VC so guys any ideas, you may rip the scen apart if you wish I have not a problem with that, so Herman as I have said earlier give me a solution or has another bug appeared in the system I tried the last scen an tested it and the VC did trigger[:)]

The clock is ticking [:)]

I believe that I have found one potential solution.

From the attached image, the original ViCond specified only ONE specific unit as eligible to fulfill the ViCond and you needed to destroy 10 such units. Obviously, this is an impossibility .

The solution I propose is to replace the ViCond from specifying a particular unit with a ViCond that looks for a Class of ships to destroy, in this case, the Armed Junk.

I have tested this ViCond 3 times and it has tripped correctly on every occasion. I do not believe that this particular ANW ViCond is a problem with the Game Engine. However, I cannot be certain since you did report that the ViCond evaluated properly on one of your test runs. The ViCond Never triggered correctly during any of my game sessions so there may be some truth to your claim that the ANW ViConds are 'twitchy', but I am unable to confirm your findings.

The scenario has been sent and I hope that it works for you.

Nice idea Herman, its seems pretty wierd that unit and class named the same dont trigger the VC what do you think, thanks for the fresh pair of eyes looking at it[:)]

Well done [:)]

As usual, if you need help, all you only have to ask. [:)]

A thank you to Herman for helping out with the VC problem which is now fixed the scenario has been uploaded with the addition of acouple of recon picks of the Armed Junk and G-5 MTB[:)]

To help when asked is noble......to offer to help without having to be asked is class [;)]

Looking forward to your help in promoting and improving other Harpoon's sites and initiatives - with cross-links, support and mutual respect - to all the community's benefit's of course. [:)]

Sorry Vince, not going to oblige your desire for yet another flamewar. Try a better bait next time.

OK, so we will note down that your official stance is not helping in promoting and improving other Harpoon's sites and initiatives - with cross-links, support and mutual respect - to all the community's benefit. Thank you for your contribution [:)]