Page 2 of 2
RE: Concerns & Questions
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 1:22 am
by dwwindsor
You just have to like a bunch of folks who cheerfully expose their work to so much potential criticism, yet keep a cheery face and even say nice things like, "but making this an optional feature is a good idea, and is likely to be implemented by us. Thanks for the suggestion."
RE: Concerns & Questions
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 4:15 am
by Gil R.
ORIGINAL: TBKR
ORIGINAL: Gil R.
TBKR,
I'm not sure what you mean by "regimental detail," but you'll be glad to know that there will be 100+ special units based on historical brigades, regiments and companies -- some chosen for their fighting reputations, others for something colorful about their name or history. We'll add more such units through patches.
Hi thanks for the reply and apologies for the delay in responding. By "Regimental detail" I was referring to whether the regiments that make up each brigade would be outlined in the game. I understand that the Brigade is the smallest size unit, however what I was hoping was that there would be stats given on each of the regiments that comprise the Brigade.
No, brigades are the smallest unit we've got.
RE: Concerns & Questions
Posted: Sat Aug 05, 2006 8:07 am
by marecone
ORIGINAL: Gil R.
These special units won't really unbalance the game, and their presence will certainly appeal to many players who like the idea of having the Iron Brigade or Terry's Texas Rangers in the game, but making this an optional feature is a good idea, and is likely to be implemented by us. Thanks for the suggestion.
Nice idea.