Page 11 of 30

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:02 pm
by montesaurus
I also had an interesting thing happen. In my surrender conditions to AU, he agreed to sell me Flanders and Lux, if I wouldn't hit him with anything on the victory conditions.
But it appears the computer added a clause that he has to pay me %52 of his annual income. When experimenting with victory claims I couldn't even come close to claiming that amount!
I'm going to subsidize him that money till it's paid back, unless anyone has a better solution!

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Wed Dec 09, 2009 11:39 pm
by evwalt
I know the surrender condition are CORRECT. Any "surrender points" not used for other things are automatically converted to cash payments.

Oh, and WAD means "Working As Designed" (ie. NOT a bug). Sorry! [8|]

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:44 am
by gravey101
GB turn 8 in

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:59 am
by montesaurus
French turn 8 is posted!

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 11:36 am
by Kingmaker
HiHi

I have put a post up on the Main Board apealing for clarification on the Russian Poland issue, if interested see "Devs, Beta testers and Experianced players" the whole thing seems a bit out to me but hopefully someone will stop by and confirm if it is all WaD.

All the Best
Peter

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:00 pm
by montesaurus
I heard from the Turk, and his 8th turn is in!
Peter, could you explain where to find that board "Devs, Beta testers and Experienced Players" board that you mentionede. I looked around the forums, and wasn't able to see it! I guess I'm not that savvy with the Matrix boards yet!
Thanks.

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:20 pm
by Kingmaker
HiHi

Monte, it's in the 3rd Block of Threads down on the CoG EE All Forums page, this MB 'Oponants Wanted'/Going Again II being in the 1st Block.

Edit, better still here's the direct link
tm.asp?m=2315469

All the Best
Peter

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:48 pm
by evwalt
Hummm. Now that I read your post Peter it DOES sound like a bug. If the troops converted to totally SWEDISH troops, they should count against your mobilization limit.

Also, you said the troops still have the Polish flag? That would suggest they would disappear if the 'new' Poland was conquered. Not very fair to you.

If this DOES turn out to be a bug, what do we do? Go "back in time" a turn and have Sweden reject the offered treaty? That would stop any ceding of Polish provinces and the creation of "new Poland" and should return everything to normal.

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 12:59 pm
by Kingmaker
HiHi

Maybe, if the other guys are OK with it, we could hold turn 8 for a short while till we get a responce from the Devs etc. Or, plough ahead regardless but take on board we "may/" need to redo the turn.

Thoughts folks?

All the Best
Peter

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 1:37 pm
by montesaurus
I would suggest that everyone does their turn per usual, but;

Lets wait till tomorrow before processing turn 8, and see if Peter gets a response on his question, in regards to this!

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 4:11 pm
by DaveConn
Regardless of when I get all the turns, I will wait until tomorrow morning (Pacific time) to process Turn 8, unless I hear otherwise. If we need to "back up in time", I have all the requisite saves to do it.
--Dave


RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:28 pm
by Kingmaker
HiHi

Sweden T8 sent in.

All the Best
Peter

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Thu Dec 10, 2009 7:46 pm
by evwalt
I would propose we DELAY (shouldn't be more than a day or two) any processing of turn 8 until we get an answer one way or the other about the possible problem.

If a bug, right now there is an easy fix (Sweden simply rejects the treaty last turn and no "new Poland.") If WAD, we can go ahead.

I simply propose a short delay because right now, nothing major appears to be going on. If we proceed and something happens, disaster, war, etc., then going back could change things radically.

If something major has/is happening that I can't see, someone sound off so we know the situation.

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 2:35 pm
by DaveConn
Apologies: I just sent out turn 9, before I saw the message above. Everyone can feel free to ignore the turn. From my first examination, it didn't look like anything major happened anyway.


RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:36 pm
by Kingmaker
HiHi

Errr, sort of major (ish), at least from Swedens perspective, all those Polish units that last turn were Swedish Army/Militia have now dissapeared.

As the prime object behind Sweden going for protectorate rights over Poland is to secure that Polish army it now all seems to be a waste of time, I'm now left with the feeling that it would have been much better in the long run to have not done the partition bit and just gone to war with everybody! Ho Hum.

All the Best
Peter

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 5:51 pm
by DaveConn
Poland is so far away from Spain! Who cares what is happening there? (Plus, I can't see it; sorry!)

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 6:09 pm
by Kingmaker
HiHi

No offence taken Dave. [:)]

Personal opinion but I think we may as well just plough ahead with the game, I doubt the issue over Polands army will get resolved soon (ish), Tough titty for me, but lets keep the game rolling.

All the Best
Peter

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 9:42 pm
by montesaurus
THe FR and TU turns #9 are posted!

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 9:59 pm
by evwalt
Russian turn 9 in!

RE: GoingAgain1792

Posted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 10:07 pm
by DaveConn
I have FR and RU; haven't seen TU turn 9 yet.