Page 11 of 26

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T33

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 11:57 am
by larryfulkerson
ORIGINAL: 76mm
....I have disbanded fort zones adjacent to enemy troops.
+1

Here's the T33 front lines before any Soviet movement:

Image

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T33

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 11:58 am
by larryfulkerson
And the T33 OOB:

Image

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T33

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 11:59 am
by larryfulkerson
And here's the ground losses so far:

Image

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T33

Posted: Sat May 14, 2011 11:59 am
by larryfulkerson
And here's the state of Soviet production for T33:

Image

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T35

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 4:27 am
by larryfulkerson
Here's the T35 front lines before any Soviet movement:

Image

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T35

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 4:28 am
by larryfulkerson
And the OOB:

Image

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T35

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 4:30 am
by larryfulkerson
And the T35 ground losses so far:

Image

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T35

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 4:30 am
by larryfulkerson
And the state of Soviet production :

Image

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T35

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 4:49 pm
by randallw
If some of those brigades are newly raised you may want to keep them farther away from the front line, so they raise up to 50 morale a little faster.

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T35

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 6:15 pm
by Klydon
Their moral will be 50 fairly fast. The thing that will lag behind is the experience. 

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T35

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 8:51 pm
by randallw
Larry lost a bit of heavy industry and armaments factories; that can happen when there's so much to juggle.  A checklist, whether physical or mental, can cut down on that.

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T35

Posted: Mon May 16, 2011 11:00 pm
by larryfulkerson
Hey ....... that's a really good idea.  Thanks.

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T37

Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 10:17 am
by larryfulkerson
Here's the T37 front lines before any Soviet movement. Kevin and I are trading the same hexes from one turn to the next. He's gaining
strength in his units again so I guess the main part of the Blizzard is over. I'm going to have to start thinking defensively now again.
In my game with Pelton I've already been rounded up, isolated, and pocketed big time and I expect the same thing to start happening in this game.

Image

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T37

Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 10:17 am
by larryfulkerson
Here's the T37 OOB:

Image

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T37

Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 10:18 am
by larryfulkerson
Here's the T37 ground losses so far:

Image

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T37

Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 10:18 am
by larryfulkerson
And the state of Soviet production as it is now:

Image

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T37

Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 12:15 pm
by heliodorus04
I hadn't checked in here in a half dozen turns.  Your counter-offensives with Bryansk and Western fronts are impressive and make me smile.

Any reason you can see why you're generally being a lot more effective in that region?

As you start thinking of defense again, remember to watch where his panzers go toward Spring.  If I were playing Axis, I'd be trying to set you up so I could cut off both Bryansk and Western fronts with a big panzer-pincer from north and south.  To me, that opportunity would be more important than the Crimea, if it was available.

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T37

Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 7:33 pm
by Tarhunnas
Can't see many panzers or motorized divisions in the front. Might they be wintering somewhere cozy? In that case they could deliver an offensive fairly quickly in an unexpected place come spring.

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T37

Posted: Wed May 18, 2011 9:16 pm
by larryfulkerson
ORIGINAL: heliodorus04

I hadn't checked in here in a half dozen turns.  Your counter-offensives with Bryansk and Western fronts are impressive and make me smile.

Any reason you can see why you're generally being a lot more effective in that region?
Um........for some reason the Axis units facing the Bryansk and Western fronts are weaker than the Axis units in other parts of the front. That's the only thing I can think of to explain the successes in attacking there. Kevin's supply lines must be further away or something to make the units on the line CV=1 and CV=2 in that region. Either that or the places to hide from the effects of winterization must be less or something. I'd have to ask Kevin and / or play the Axis side to know for sure I guess.

RE: 1.04.16 Fulkerson vs KLilly T37

Posted: Thu May 19, 2011 6:35 am
by randallw
I see a few rifle divisions scattered far behind the front; any plans for them?