Page 11 of 44

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:39 am
by larryfulkerson
Those Claudes have the potential to make this enterprise expensive. I've accomplished about all I could have expected....maybe it's time
to back off and regroup. Bring that third carrier to bear w/ these two. That kind of thing. Plus, our presence could be needed around
the Rabaul area according to recent developments so I'll head that way with the carriers.

Image

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:43 am
by larryfulkerson
Yes, it's definately time to quit doing this kind of thing within range of those Oscars. This is getting way to expensive for the ships I have
opportunity to attack.

Image

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:46 am
by larryfulkerson
And then the Japs take a dump on my shipping again:

Image

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:50 am
by larryfulkerson
And the KB did a passing air strike on the facilities and damaged some things but I don't think they are coming to stay this time. I'm
thinking they are really just passing by on their way to bigger and better things.

EDIT: That reminds me....I need to get some mines to Midway before Elmer tries to invade.

Image

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:54 am
by larryfulkerson
Those Nates north of Kota Bharu are certainly doing their job........I can't seem to get through the CAP the Japs have put up. How come
when I play the Jap player I can't seem to get this kind of performance from my Nates?

Image

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 4:58 am
by larryfulkerson
I could have sworn that I put all the B-17's on Naval Search missions.....I guess there was a squadron I missed. I made sure this time.

Image

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:02 am
by larryfulkerson
And then that Jap carrier near Rabaul put in another air strike on my ships:

Image

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:04 am
by larryfulkerson
And then these attacks happened within moments of each other:

EDIT: I think I'll look into why they are dropping bombs instead of torps.

Image

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:08 am
by larryfulkerson
It's my own fault Pick got hit.....I keep encouraging them to attack on the surface and save torps.

Image

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:11 am
by larryfulkerson
And then the Japs invaded Rabaul:

Image

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:15 am
by larryfulkerson
And then the Japs captured Guam:

Image

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:18 am
by larryfulkerson
7 Jap casualties isn't worth the supply burned to cause them. I'd better knock that off and just roll w/ the punches.

Image

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:18 am
by larryfulkerson
Here's the combat report for those of you keeping up with China affairs:

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:12 am
by larryfulkerson
There's a lot of failed industries still. Melborne, Sydney, Pearl Harbor.....a lot of the big names are on there too.

Image

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:28 am
by larryfulkerson
I rounded up all the damaged ships at Shortlands, victums of Jap air power, gave them an escort, and pointed them to the repair yard at
Brisbane. Brisbane is only a level 10 repair yard and I'm wondering if the CA can even dock in it. They probably won't get there so I
don't need to worry about it probably.

Image

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:34 am
by larryfulkerson
TF 138 was originally going to Lae but since we now know that there's a Jap carrier within range of Shortlands.......well, Tulagi might be a
better place to take the 11th Australia Rgt. I need to get my own air power into those air fields on Shortlands and Tulagi both. Maybe I
could arrange some kind of boat delivery like the Japs do.

Image

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:48 am
by larryfulkerson
The Gull Battalion is being unloaded at Lae as we speak and it's a race against time. It's not going to be much longer that Elmer is
going to notice that there's a ship unloading in it's jurisdiction so to speak. And then the bombing will start. That Jap carrier is probably
still in the area somewhere.

Image

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:01 am
by larryfulkerson
Port Blair got a welcome addition to it's pitiful INF component. NOW they are a roadbump.

Image

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:44 am
by catwhoorg
Interesting read.

Just picked the game up as part of the Holiday sale.
Its completely overwhelming right now :)

RE: (A) Fulkerson vs Jap vers 7.0

Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:55 am
by MBF
Nice read and I love all the images - and the fact you have resized them to fit on a normal monitor !! Many thanks for those of use with older screens :-)