Page 110 of 176

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 1:24 pm
by ItBurns
ORIGINAL: warspite1

Okay, next clue.

Which warship am I?

1. I do not have a counter in WIF or any of its add ons, however, you could easily make the case for including one (I am bigger than a destroyer).
2. If ADG did give me a counter, I would be likely to start 1939 scenarios in the construction pool; for the same reason as USS Wyoming. Alternatively I could start on map - but would have suitably reduced factors.....

I'm at work so can't check my counters but I remember that the Japanese have a cruiser in the contruction pool by the name of Izuma(?). This cruiser was a WWI ship that I believe was being used as a training ship but concievably could have been reffited for active duty.

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 1:58 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: ItBurns

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Okay, next clue.

Which warship am I?

1. I do not have a counter in WIF or any of its add ons, however, you could easily make the case for including one (I am bigger than a destroyer).
2. If ADG did give me a counter, I would be likely to start 1939 scenarios in the construction pool; for the same reason as USS Wyoming. Alternatively I could start on map - but would have suitably reduced factors.....

I'm at work so can't check my counters but I remember that the Japanese have a cruiser in the contruction pool by the name of Izuma(?). This cruiser was a WWI ship that I believe was being used as a training ship but concievably could have been reffited for active duty.
Warspite1

That's the sort of thing - Idzumo has a counter, but the subject of this question does not.

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:49 pm
by warspite1
Clue no.3.

Which warship am I?

1. I do not have a counter in WIF or any of its add ons, however, you could easily make the case for including one (I am bigger than a destroyer).
2. If ADG did give me a counter, I would be likely to start 1939 scenarios in the construction pool; for the same reason as USS Wyoming. Alternatively I could start on map - but would have suitably reduced factors.....
3. During my life I changed not only my name (once) but also my ship type (a number of times).

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:29 am
by warspite1
Clue no.4. This should narrow it down a bit.

Which warship am I?

1. I do not have a counter in WIF or any of its add ons, however, you could easily make the case for including one (I am bigger than a destroyer).
2. If ADG did give me a counter, I would be likely to start 1939 scenarios in the construction pool; for the same reason as USS Wyoming. Alternatively I could start on map - but would have suitably reduced factors.....
3. During my life I changed not only my name (once) but also my ship type (a number of times).
4. I am a Royal Navy vessel.

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 3:33 pm
by Centuur
Question: which airplane was the example for the developers of the Lockheed P-38 Lightning?


RE: Next quiz

Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 6:35 pm
by warspite1
Clue no.5. Last clue.

Which warship am I?

1. I do not have a counter in WIF or any of its add ons, however, you could easily make the case for including one (I am bigger than a destroyer).
2. If ADG did give me a counter, I would be likely to start 1939 scenarios in the construction pool; for the same reason as USS Wyoming. Alternatively I could start on map - but would have suitably reduced factors.....
3. During my life I changed not only my name (once) but also my ship type (a number of times).
4. I am a Royal Navy vessel.
5. I was used extensively off Narvik, Norway April - June 1940, after which I was largely used in backwater theatres. I survived the war, unlike one of my three original sisters (all of whom have a WIF Counter) - a fourth ship of my original class was lost during the inter-war years.

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 8:53 pm
by Orm
ORIGINAL: warspite1

Clue no.5. Last clue.

Which warship am I?

1. I do not have a counter in WIF or any of its add ons, however, you could easily make the case for including one (I am bigger than a destroyer).
2. If ADG did give me a counter, I would be likely to start 1939 scenarios in the construction pool; for the same reason as USS Wyoming. Alternatively I could start on map - but would have suitably reduced factors.....
3. During my life I changed not only my name (once) but also my ship type (a number of times).
4. I am a Royal Navy vessel.
5. I was used extensively off Narvik, Norway April - June 1940, after which I was largely used in backwater theatres. I survived the war, unlike one of my three original sisters (all of whom have a WIF Counter) - a fourth ship of my original class was lost during the inter-war years.
I have no idea. [&:]

The only ships I can think of have either a MWIF counter or is a destroyer.

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 8:58 pm
by Orm
I have a new question for you guys to ponder on as well as the previous questions.

Which warship am I?
1) I have a counter in MWIF.
2) During WWII a well known authour dedicated a book to my officers and crew.

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Tue Jul 12, 2011 9:29 pm
by paulderynck
ORIGINAL: warspite1

Clue no.5. Last clue.

Which warship am I?

1. I do not have a counter in WIF or any of its add ons, however, you could easily make the case for including one (I am bigger than a destroyer).
2. If ADG did give me a counter, I would be likely to start 1939 scenarios in the construction pool; for the same reason as USS Wyoming. Alternatively I could start on map - but would have suitably reduced factors.....
3. During my life I changed not only my name (once) but also my ship type (a number of times).
4. I am a Royal Navy vessel.
5. I was used extensively off Narvik, Norway April - June 1940, after which I was largely used in backwater theatres. I survived the war, unlike one of my three original sisters (all of whom have a WIF Counter) - a fourth ship of my original class was lost during the inter-war years.
It seems it's one of the Monitors. Roberts? WiF has a Roberts II.

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:18 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: paulderynck

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Clue no.5. Last clue.

Which warship am I?

1. I do not have a counter in WIF or any of its add ons, however, you could easily make the case for including one (I am bigger than a destroyer).
2. If ADG did give me a counter, I would be likely to start 1939 scenarios in the construction pool; for the same reason as USS Wyoming. Alternatively I could start on map - but would have suitably reduced factors.....
3. During my life I changed not only my name (once) but also my ship type (a number of times).
4. I am a Royal Navy vessel.
5. I was used extensively off Narvik, Norway April - June 1940, after which I was largely used in backwater theatres. I survived the war, unlike one of my three original sisters (all of whom have a WIF Counter) - a fourth ship of my original class was lost during the inter-war years.
It seems it's one of the Monitors. Roberts? WiF has a Roberts II.
Warspite1

I'm not a monitor. I'm feeling generous so here is one final absolute giveaway clue.

1. I do not have a counter in WIF or any of its add ons, however, you could easily make the case for including one (I am bigger than a destroyer).
2. If ADG did give me a counter, I would be likely to start 1939 scenarios in the construction pool; for the same reason as USS Wyoming. Alternatively I could start on map - but would have suitably reduced factors.....
3. During my life I changed not only my name (once) but also my ship type (a number of times).
4. I am a Royal Navy vessel.
5. I was used extensively off Narvik, Norway April - June 1940, after which I was largely used in backwater theatres. I survived the war, unlike one of my three original sisters (all of whom have a WIF Counter) - a fourth ship of my original class was lost during the inter-war years.
6. I was designed as a cruiser, but unlike my four sisters, was not completed as originally designed. The reason that "treaty" or "heavy" cruiser specification was set at the level it was at the Washington Treaty 1922, was due to the size of my sisters.

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 3:22 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Orm

I have a new question for you guys to ponder on as well as the previous questions.

Which warship am I?
1) I have a counter in MWIF.
2) During WWII a well known authour dedicated a book to my officers and crew.
Warspite1

HMS Penelope [&o][&o] - HMS Pepperpot - one of my favourite cruisers!

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 6:59 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: paulderynck

ORIGINAL: warspite1

Clue no.5. Last clue.

Which warship am I?

1. I do not have a counter in WIF or any of its add ons, however, you could easily make the case for including one (I am bigger than a destroyer).
2. If ADG did give me a counter, I would be likely to start 1939 scenarios in the construction pool; for the same reason as USS Wyoming. Alternatively I could start on map - but would have suitably reduced factors.....
3. During my life I changed not only my name (once) but also my ship type (a number of times).
4. I am a Royal Navy vessel.
5. I was used extensively off Narvik, Norway April - June 1940, after which I was largely used in backwater theatres. I survived the war, unlike one of my three original sisters (all of whom have a WIF Counter) - a fourth ship of my original class was lost during the inter-war years.
It seems it's one of the Monitors. Roberts? WiF has a Roberts II.
Warspite1

I'm not a monitor. I'm feeling generous so here is one final absolute giveaway clue.

1. I do not have a counter in WIF or any of its add ons, however, you could easily make the case for including one (I am bigger than a destroyer).
2. If ADG did give me a counter, I would be likely to start 1939 scenarios in the construction pool; for the same reason as USS Wyoming. Alternatively I could start on map - but would have suitably reduced factors.....
3. During my life I changed not only my name (once) but also my ship type (a number of times).
4. I am a Royal Navy vessel.
5. I was used extensively off Narvik, Norway April - June 1940, after which I was largely used in backwater theatres. I survived the war, unlike one of my three original sisters (all of whom have a WIF Counter) - a fourth ship of my original class was lost during the inter-war years.
6. I was designed as a cruiser, but unlike my four sisters, was not completed as originally designed. The reason that "treaty" or "heavy" cruiser specification was set at the level it was at the Washington Treaty 1922, was due to the size of my sisters.
Warspite1

Well, I did say it was one for the grognards. The answer was HMS Vindictive. She began life during the First World War as a Hawkins-class cruiser with the name Cavendish (all ships of the class were named after Elizabethan naval heroes). However, she was completed as an aircraft carrier (albeit without a conventional flush deck), before returning to cruiser status during the twenties. Thereafter she spent time as a training ship and then a fleet repair ship.

In this latter configuration, she was deployed off Norway for that ill-fated operation and her six 4-inch HA guns were much used as the Royal Navy were constantly harried by the Luftwaffe.

USS Wyoming and USS Langley are available to the US player (assuming the US player wants to spend the build points to re-convert those ships to BB/CV - neither of which happened in real life). ADG could have done the same for HMS Vindictive.

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Wed Jul 13, 2011 9:00 pm
by michaelbaldur
ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: paulderynck



It seems it's one of the Monitors. Roberts? WiF has a Roberts II.
Warspite1

I'm not a monitor. I'm feeling generous so here is one final absolute giveaway clue.

1. I do not have a counter in WIF or any of its add ons, however, you could easily make the case for including one (I am bigger than a destroyer).
2. If ADG did give me a counter, I would be likely to start 1939 scenarios in the construction pool; for the same reason as USS Wyoming. Alternatively I could start on map - but would have suitably reduced factors.....
3. During my life I changed not only my name (once) but also my ship type (a number of times).
4. I am a Royal Navy vessel.
5. I was used extensively off Narvik, Norway April - June 1940, after which I was largely used in backwater theatres. I survived the war, unlike one of my three original sisters (all of whom have a WIF Counter) - a fourth ship of my original class was lost during the inter-war years.
6. I was designed as a cruiser, but unlike my four sisters, was not completed as originally designed. The reason that "treaty" or "heavy" cruiser specification was set at the level it was at the Washington Treaty 1922, was due to the size of my sisters.
Warspite1

Well, I did say it was one for the grognards. The answer was HMS Vindictive. She began life during the First World War as a Hawkins-class cruiser with the name Cavendish (all ships of the class were named after Elizabethan naval heroes). However, she was completed as an aircraft carrier (albeit without a conventional flush deck), before returning to cruiser status during the twenties. Thereafter she spent time as a training ship and then a fleet repair ship.

In this latter configuration, she was deployed off Norway for that ill-fated operation and her six 4-inch HA guns were much used as the Royal Navy were constantly harried by the Luftwaffe.

USS Wyoming and USS Langley are available to the US player (assuming the US player wants to spend the build points to re-convert those ships to BB/CV - neither of which happened in real life). ADG could have done the same for HMS Vindictive.

I know there are no more unit changes to the game right now .. but maybe this should be added .. as she is clearly missing

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 4:29 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: michaelbaldur

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: warspite1


Warspite1

I'm not a monitor. I'm feeling generous so here is one final absolute giveaway clue.

1. I do not have a counter in WIF or any of its add ons, however, you could easily make the case for including one (I am bigger than a destroyer).
2. If ADG did give me a counter, I would be likely to start 1939 scenarios in the construction pool; for the same reason as USS Wyoming. Alternatively I could start on map - but would have suitably reduced factors.....
3. During my life I changed not only my name (once) but also my ship type (a number of times).
4. I am a Royal Navy vessel.
5. I was used extensively off Narvik, Norway April - June 1940, after which I was largely used in backwater theatres. I survived the war, unlike one of my three original sisters (all of whom have a WIF Counter) - a fourth ship of my original class was lost during the inter-war years.
6. I was designed as a cruiser, but unlike my four sisters, was not completed as originally designed. The reason that "treaty" or "heavy" cruiser specification was set at the level it was at the Washington Treaty 1922, was due to the size of my sisters.
Warspite1

Well, I did say it was one for the grognards. The answer was HMS Vindictive. She began life during the First World War as a Hawkins-class cruiser with the name Cavendish (all ships of the class were named after Elizabethan naval heroes). However, she was completed as an aircraft carrier (albeit without a conventional flush deck), before returning to cruiser status during the twenties. Thereafter she spent time as a training ship and then a fleet repair ship.

In this latter configuration, she was deployed off Norway for that ill-fated operation and her six 4-inch HA guns were much used as the Royal Navy were constantly harried by the Luftwaffe.

USS Wyoming and USS Langley are available to the US player (assuming the US player wants to spend the build points to re-convert those ships to BB/CV - neither of which happened in real life). ADG could have done the same for HMS Vindictive.

I know there are no more unit changes to the game right now .. but maybe this should be added .. as she is clearly missing
Warspite1

There are a few anomalies like this - the RN Cruiser / Minelayers for example - maybe MWIF2 can add these "missing" vessels.

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:07 pm
by Extraneous
ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: paulderynck



It seems it's one of the Monitors. Roberts? WiF has a Roberts II.
Warspite1

I'm not a monitor. I'm feeling generous so here is one final absolute giveaway clue.

1. I do not have a counter in WIF or any of its add ons, however, you could easily make the case for including one (I am bigger than a destroyer).
2. If ADG did give me a counter, I would be likely to start 1939 scenarios in the construction pool; for the same reason as USS Wyoming. Alternatively I could start on map - but would have suitably reduced factors.....
3. During my life I changed not only my name (once) but also my ship type (a number of times).
4. I am a Royal Navy vessel.
5. I was used extensively off Narvik, Norway April - June 1940, after which I was largely used in backwater theatres. I survived the war, unlike one of my three original sisters (all of whom have a WIF Counter) - a fourth ship of my original class was lost during the inter-war years.
6. I was designed as a cruiser, but unlike my four sisters, was not completed as originally designed. The reason that "treaty" or "heavy" cruiser specification was set at the level it was at the Washington Treaty 1922, was due to the size of my sisters.
Warspite1

Well, I did say it was one for the grognards. The answer was HMS Vindictive. She began life during the First World War as a Hawkins-class cruiser with the name Cavendish (all ships of the class were named after Elizabethan naval heroes). However, she was completed as an aircraft carrier (albeit without a conventional flush deck), before returning to cruiser status during the twenties. Thereafter she spent time as a training ship and then a fleet repair ship.

In this latter configuration, she was deployed off Norway for that ill-fated operation and her six 4-inch HA guns were much used as the Royal Navy were constantly harried by the Luftwaffe.

USS Wyoming and USS Langley are available to the US player (assuming the US player wants to spend the build points to re-convert those ships to BB/CV - neither of which happened in real life). ADG could have done the same for HMS Vindictive.

In Norway Fleet Repair Ship HMS Vindictive was used as a troopship. So it is in the game in abstract.


11/09/42 – 11/12/42 From Gibraltar to Oran, Algeria
Fleet Repair Ship HMS Vindictive
Destroyer Depot Ship HMS Hecla 11/12/42 Sunk by U-515
Destroyer HMS Marne (G 35) 11/12/42 U-515 causes extensive damage to stern and X-mount is totally disabled 11/13/42 towed by Tug HMS Salvonia and escorted by Corvette HMS Jonquil into Gibraltar
Destroyer HMS Venomous (D 75) 11/12/42 relived by Corvette HMS Jonquil to deliver 568 survivors from Destroyer Depot Ship HMS Hecla to Casablanca, French Morocco

Still working on Torch.


RE: Next quiz

Posted: Thu Jul 14, 2011 10:19 pm
by Extraneous
What is a “HDML”?

What is a “MMS”?

What is a “Fast Patrol Boat”?


Extra credit: Name the British “Convoy Escort Vessel” with the Japanese name that was in Operation Torch.

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 12:17 am
by paulderynck
MMS = Magnetic Mine Sweeper ?

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 3:57 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Extraneous

ORIGINAL: warspite1

ORIGINAL: warspite1


Warspite1

I'm not a monitor. I'm feeling generous so here is one final absolute giveaway clue.

1. I do not have a counter in WIF or any of its add ons, however, you could easily make the case for including one (I am bigger than a destroyer).
2. If ADG did give me a counter, I would be likely to start 1939 scenarios in the construction pool; for the same reason as USS Wyoming. Alternatively I could start on map - but would have suitably reduced factors.....
3. During my life I changed not only my name (once) but also my ship type (a number of times).
4. I am a Royal Navy vessel.
5. I was used extensively off Narvik, Norway April - June 1940, after which I was largely used in backwater theatres. I survived the war, unlike one of my three original sisters (all of whom have a WIF Counter) - a fourth ship of my original class was lost during the inter-war years.
6. I was designed as a cruiser, but unlike my four sisters, was not completed as originally designed. The reason that "treaty" or "heavy" cruiser specification was set at the level it was at the Washington Treaty 1922, was due to the size of my sisters.
Warspite1

Well, I did say it was one for the grognards. The answer was HMS Vindictive. She began life during the First World War as a Hawkins-class cruiser with the name Cavendish (all ships of the class were named after Elizabethan naval heroes). However, she was completed as an aircraft carrier (albeit without a conventional flush deck), before returning to cruiser status during the twenties. Thereafter she spent time as a training ship and then a fleet repair ship.

In this latter configuration, she was deployed off Norway for that ill-fated operation and her six 4-inch HA guns were much used as the Royal Navy were constantly harried by the Luftwaffe.

USS Wyoming and USS Langley are available to the US player (assuming the US player wants to spend the build points to re-convert those ships to BB/CV - neither of which happened in real life). ADG could have done the same for HMS Vindictive.

In Norway Fleet Repair Ship HMS Vindictive was used as a troopship. So it is in the game in abstract.
Warspite1

You can argue that USS Langley (acting as an aircraft transport) is represented in WIF in abstract. However, the point is, she gets a counter and the US player can convert her back to an aircraft carrier. USS Wyoming was a training ship, but the US player can spend the build points to convert her back to an operational battleship.

In setting the clues for this quiz question I simply stated that Vindictive could have been given a counter and been treated like Langley and Wyoming.

One of the great things about a computer game of course is that there is no longer a counter limitation, and these sort of anomalies can be put right.

BTW, HMS Vindictive was used in Norway to carry troops, but she was also used as an AA ship - in Skjelfjorden and elsewhere, and as an escort for actual troopships.

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Fri Jul 15, 2011 8:58 am
by Extraneous
ORIGINAL: paulderynck

MMS = Magnetic Mine Sweeper ?
What is a “HDML”?

What is a “MMS”?

What is a “Fast Patrol Boat”?


Extra credit: Name the British “Convoy Escort Vessel” with the Japanese name that was in Operation Torch.

What is a “HDML”? "L" stands for "Launch".

What is a “MMS”? No not Magnetic. Yes "MS" stands for "Mine Sweeper".

What is a “Fast Patrol Boat”? This was a redefinition of 2 boat types I'll take either one or both.


Extra credit: Name the British “Convoy Escort Vessel” with the Japanese name that was in Operation Torch.

No clues will be given for extra credit questions [:-]

RE: Next quiz

Posted: Sat Jul 16, 2011 7:37 am
by Extraneous
What is a “HDML”? "Harbor Defense Motor Launch"

What is a “MMS”? "Motor Mine Sweeper".

What is a “Fast Patrol Boat”? Motor Torpedo Boats and Motor Gun Boats


Extra credit: Name the British “Convoy Escort Vessel” with the Japanese name that was in Operation Torch.

Convoy Escort Vessel (Yacht) Sayonara