Page 12 of 12
RE: Japanese airframe production
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 1:32 pm
by FatR
Use the "Request Veteran" option to draw pilots from TRACOM.
RE: Japanese airframe production
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:22 pm
by findmeifyoucan
Just a question about all these changes you plan to make to air production. How long do you think this will take to make all these changes and have everything producing, 3 years?? LOL
RE: Japanese airframe production
Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 10:34 pm
by Kitakami
ORIGINAL: findmeifyoucan
Just a question about all these changes you plan to make to air production. How long do you think this will take to make all these changes and have everything producing, 3 years?? LOL
If said in jest, ignore my comment. But it does not take that long to make all those changes. In fact, I find them quite moderate. My personal prefence would be 20 Zeros less and 30 Oscars more, but that is merely a preference

RE: Japanese airframe production
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 1:55 pm
by findmeifyoucan
Okay, I am sure it would not take that long but with all the changes are you sure the supply expenditure is affordable for the Japanese? Aren't Zeros the better fighter plane? I would think you'd prefer the Zeros over the Oscars. While talking about Oscars I assume the c class is the best one though it would appear that the class a has much longer range.
RE: Japanese airframe production
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 3:34 pm
by pacificbetta
Zeroes are for carrier capabale IJN squadrons, and the oscars are meant for land based IJA squadrons. Both plane types cannot equip the squadrons of the "other" service arms.
RE: Japanese airframe production
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 3:51 pm
by findmeifyoucan
I always thought that there were both land based and Carrier based Zeros in War in the Pacific?
RE: Japanese airframe production
Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 5:30 pm
by pacificbetta
There are LB zeroes in the game. What I was trying to say was that the oscar equipped squadrons cannot ever use zero. They are simply incompatible and that is why there is a need for oscar (or later replacement plan types) even though zero is a much better plane than oscar.
RE: Japanese airframe production
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 9:42 am
by PaxMondo
ORIGINAL: findmeifyoucan
I always thought that there were both land based and Carrier based Zeros in War in the Pacific?
A6M2 is an IJN plane and can only equp IJN fgroups. You have a lot of IJA groups and for those you will need Oscar to start as it is your best IJA plane.
RE: Japanese airframe production
Posted: Thu Dec 24, 2009 1:16 pm
by Chickenboy
ORIGINAL: PaxMondo
ORIGINAL: findmeifyoucan
I always thought that there were both land based and Carrier based Zeros in War in the Pacific?
A6M2 is an IJN plane and can only equp IJN fgroups. You have a lot of IJA groups and for those you will need Oscar to start as it is your best IJA plane.
@findmeifyoucan:
You're correct, there are IJN land-based fighter units operating the A6M2 (and the Claude early in the war pre-upgrade). For the most part, these units start in the Marshall islands and Taiwan.
RE: Japanese airframe production
Posted: Fri Mar 23, 2012 1:54 pm
by treespider
About to start re-reading old threads ... I a$$-u-me some of these are still relevant. Would this be a good one?
RE: Japanese airframe production
Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:47 am
by PaxMondo
sure ... there are a number of these. they seem to recycle every month or two. [;)]