Page 12 of 19

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Sun Oct 24, 2021 10:58 pm
by Mike Solli
Here's what I'm doing in Phase II. A few notes here:

Bataan: This is reinforcing artillery from Hong Kong. The combat forces are 16 Division and 65 Brigade along with some other artillery units.

Singapore: This is everything.

Edit: Just noticed that I was missing 4 & 15 Independent Engineer Regiments.

Reserves: 21 Division will land at Java unless someplace else runs into a snag. The SNLF units will most likely be added to the units taking the multitude of small bases throughout the SRA.

Order:

Land at Merak to enable the Oosthaven force to pass through. Concurrently or immediately after, Kaldjati invasion will happen to place land based air in the center of Java-Sumatra. The landings at the oil fields will not happen until the concern about enemy bombing is reduced. (That oil ain't going nowhere!)

Zamboanga will happen soon. That's the only supply source on Mindanao.



Image

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2021 8:09 am
by madflava13
Really good stuff Mike. This thread is giving me the itch to reinstall after several years away!

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2021 8:20 am
by btd64
You got it under control....GP

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2021 8:44 am
by Uncivil Engineer
ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Isn't it weird how that works? I'm 3rd generation Italian American and I'm a retired US Army officer. My Dad served in the US Army in the ETO during WWII and I had 2 uncles serve in the US Navy in the PTO in WWII. I also had members of my family serve in the Italian Army in WWII. Finally, I had a grandfather serve in the Italian Army in WWI. Yeah, it is weird how our interests often are different than what they "should" be.

Almost sounds like me!

My great grandparents came to the US in the 1890's; my grandfather, Romeo, was born in NY. I'm a retired US Army officer (Corps of Engineers, just passed 30 years, so no more SBP payments). My Dad served in the 69 Div (artillery) in Europe in WWII. Two uncles served in Korea, one in the Signal Corps and one on a carrier. As far as I know none of my relatives served in the Italian Army, but those that didn't come to the States certainly could have.

A friend of the family has traced our line back to MarcAntonio, born in 1701, in Pacentro, Italy.

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:19 am
by Mike Solli
ORIGINAL: madflava13

Really good stuff Mike. This thread is giving me the itch to reinstall after several years away!

The itch always comes back, doesn't it? [:D]

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:20 am
by Mike Solli
ORIGINAL: btd64

You got it under control....GP

Easy to say in December 1941. [:D]

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:23 am
by Mike Solli
ORIGINAL: Uncivil Engineer

ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

Isn't it weird how that works? I'm 3rd generation Italian American and I'm a retired US Army officer. My Dad served in the US Army in the ETO during WWII and I had 2 uncles serve in the US Navy in the PTO in WWII. I also had members of my family serve in the Italian Army in WWII. Finally, I had a grandfather serve in the Italian Army in WWI. Yeah, it is weird how our interests often are different than what they "should" be.

Almost sounds like me!

My great grandparents came to the US in the 1890's; my grandfather, Romeo, was born in NY. I'm a retired US Army officer (Corps of Engineers, just passed 30 years, so no more SBP payments). My Dad served in the 69 Div (artillery) in Europe in WWII. Two uncles served in Korea, one in the Signal Corps and one on a carrier. As far as I know none of my relatives served in the Italian Army, but those that didn't come to the States certainly could have.

A friend of the family has traced our line back to MarcAntonio, born in 1701, in Pacentro, Italy.

I love hearing this stuff, especially the units. It brings the units to life when you see them in a game. [:)]

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2021 4:22 am
by Tanaka
ORIGINAL: madflava13

Really good stuff Mike. This thread is giving me the itch to reinstall after several years away!

You uninstalled the best game ever made? What? I've taken years off but never uninstalled! Blasphemy! [:D]

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2021 3:10 pm
by madflava13
Lol. I built a new computer, so everything was uninstalled in a sense. I've been very heavily into Eve Online the last few years - very different than this, but fun nonetheless.

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2021 1:00 pm
by SuluSea
Always great to read your AARs Mike!

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 6:48 pm
by rustysi
I know you're aware of this, but I just wanted to throw in a reminder. If you're intending to convert your CS's to CVL's remember the first two must be done in Tokyo and it must have a repair yard of 50.

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2021 9:42 am
by Mike Solli
ORIGINAL: rustysi

I know you're aware of this, but I just wanted to throw in a reminder. If you're intending to convert your CS's to CVL's remember the first two must be done in Tokyo and it must have a repair yard of 50.

Already increasing it! But thanks for the reminder!

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2021 9:44 am
by Mike Solli
ORIGINAL: SuluSea

Always great to read your AARs Mike!

Thanks. I appreciate that. For some weird reason, I really like to make AARs.

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2021 9:53 am
by Mike Solli
15 Dec 41

Sub War

Nothing today except a lot of misses on both sides (subs and ASW). [>:]

5 Fleet

The Adak invasion force will arrive there tomorrow.

The 3 battalions of 90 Regiment will begin loading at Rashin, Korea (literally on the border of the Soviet Union). They will probably go to Adak, Unmak Island and Dutch Harbor.

4 Fleet

Nothing much going on here. The I/33 Regiment will get a small reinforcement (2 Independent SNLF Company) to assist in taking Guam. The slackers… [8|]

SE Fleet

An amphibious assault of Shortlands Island happened today. I’m sure it was a surprise to Mike. They’ll take it tomorrow. [:D]

The two Japanese AMC that begin the war in the far SE Pacific were moving to raid Suva, but were still a few hexes SE and were smacked by some Vindicators, heavily damaging both. They probably won’t make it back to port, but at least I got some valuable intel from the mishap. Those Vindicators most likely were those on board the Lexington, which tells me that she probably is down there somewhere (and maybe Enterprise too). That could be a nice encounter with KB.

The Rabaul invasion force is 2 days out, assisted by 2 BBs. The Gasmata invasion force is also 2 days out, but will wait until the BBs are free to escort them. It all depends on the enemy response at Rabaul.

The 4 Division is 2 days out from Truk. They are the Pt. Moresby invasion force.

Finally, KB will arrive at Truk tomorrow. They’ll layover just long enough to refuel, rearm and add a few planes. Then they head south to stir up trouble. They are currently undetected.

SRA

An xAKL (probably a laggard) was sunk by surface forces about 6 hexes W of Peleliu. That may be the last of the thundering herd.

Philippines: Seven enemy fighters were shot down at a cost of 2 Zeros. I still see 5 enemy fighters over Manila/Clark. Another sweep goes in tomorrow.

Mindanao: Three B-17s hit the 146 Regiment at Butuan (next to Cagayan). Not sure where they came from (somewhere to the west) but they used a reduced bomb load. That means they could be anywhere. [8|] Some Nells bombed Cagayan’s airfield destroying a Seagull.

The two tank regiments should arrive at Cagayan tomorrow and will attack the day after.

Malaya: The weather was poor, so no planes flew in the region. I see 2 fighters at Georgetown and 1 at Singapore. I’ll continue to sweep both places and 80 Sallies are scheduled to hit Singapore’s airfield again tomorrow.

The 91 Naval Guard captured Malacca, ousting the 1 Hyderabad battalion. Unfortunately, they retreated up the eastern rail line, the one I want to clear. The Naval Guards will chase them to either destroy them or push them toward Kuala Lumpur.

The 124 Regiment is heading south down the rail line from Kota Bharu to destroy the 8 Indian and FSMV Brigades. They’re both in bad shape and are being bombed from about 120 sorties a day.

I am dropping paratroopers on Temuloh tomorrow. Taking that base along with clearing the two brigades and battalion mentioned above will allow me to rail IG division to Jahore Bahru. 33 Division will land at Mersing in 2 days and take another couple to march to Jahore Bahru. Then, the Singapore invasion force will move into Singapore. I listed the force earlier, but it consists of 25 HQ, IG, 5, 18 & 33 Divisions, two tank regiments, 6 artillery units and a couple of independent engineer regiments.

Burma

I now see 95(!) fighters at Rangoon. [X(] After liberating Singapore, I plan on sending a couple of bombardment forces there to turn those fighters into scrap.

There are a number of small TFs at Rangoon (1 ship, I think). I think it’s a CAP trap to try and kill off some of my Nells/Betties. I’m not falling for it. [:-]

China

I’ve been collecting DMS (13 of ‘em) to clear out the mines at Hong Kong when that base was liberated. They got there yesterday and cleared out all of them, some 350 or so. They’re headed toward Singapore so they can do the same thing when Singapore is liberated.

Two tank regiments trashed the defending Chinese Corps a hex NW of Paotow pushing them to the west. They’ll chase with the goal of eventually reaching Lanchow. A couple of brigades are enroute up there to help them out if needed.

Other Stuff

By shutting off the Yamato temporarily, I’ve been able to accelerate all 6 Unryus and half a dozen DDs too. I plan on turning on Yamato when she reaches the same date as Musashi (Dec 42). This is new for me. I’ve always built Yamato right out of the gate.

My air R&D is progressing as nice as can be expected at this date in the war. A Sam factory has actually repaired 1 of 30. [:D]

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2021 10:21 am
by RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Mike Solli

ORIGINAL: SuluSea

Always great to read your AARs Mike!

Thanks. I appreciate that. For some weird reason, I really like to make AARs.

Military and government work habit: document, document, then document some more.[;)]

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2021 12:21 pm
by Q-Ball
I think delaying Yamato until Dec 1942 is the right move for Japan; I did that last game. I also halted Junyo even to bring Junyo/Hiyo in as a pair....I didn't see a need to accelerate them as USN unlikely to challenge KB in first 6 months. I also halted construction of most submarines except for half-dozen nearly complete float-plane subs

Doing all that allows you to accelerate all the CVs without adding additional Naval SY capacity....that gives you a large reinforcement of CVs just as the USN is also receiving CVs in 1943, and should keep the IJN competitive for longer

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2021 3:44 pm
by rustysi
I now see 95(!) fighters at Rangoon. After liberating Singapore, I plan on sending a couple of bombardment forces there to turn those fighters into scrap.

IIRC this involves entering the river mouth to get there, and I don't think BB's can do that.

RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2021 3:59 pm
by Lowpe
ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

I think delaying Yamato until Dec 1942 is the right move for Japan; I did that last game. I also halted Junyo even to bring Junyo/Hiyo in as a pair....I didn't see a need to accelerate them as USN unlikely to challenge KB in first 6 months. I also halted construction of most submarines except for half-dozen nearly complete float-plane subs

Doing all that allows you to accelerate all the CVs without adding additional Naval SY capacity....that gives you a large reinforcement of CVs just as the USN is also receiving CVs in 1943, and should keep the IJN competitive for longer

I don't think there is a cut and dry answer here....other than your builds (plane and ship and economy) should synergize with your overall game goals.

Some JFBs can use the super heavies really well...others not so much.

I have mirrored your strategy Q-ball in the past, and also done the exact opposite building the super heavies and submarines -- both strategies can work or really anything between.

Same holds true with CS-CV conversions. Here though I prefer to leave CS as CS and stuff them with float fighters....worked really well for me thru 43 into 44 but in 44+ I think having Sams on board a bit better...but again it depends upon what the strategies and game situation is. It is a long conversion.



RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2021 4:12 pm
by rustysi
ORIGINAL: rustysi
I now see 95(!) fighters at Rangoon. After liberating Singapore, I plan on sending a couple of bombardment forces there to turn those fighters into scrap.

IIRC this involves entering the river mouth to get there, and I don't think BB's can do that.


I addition to what I've said remember bombardment TF's can and will damage all production at a base.


RE: Logistics in the Pacific - USSAmerica (A), Mike (J)

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2021 4:19 pm
by Q-Ball
ORIGINAL: Lowpe

ORIGINAL: Q-Ball

I think delaying Yamato until Dec 1942 is the right move for Japan; I did that last game. I also halted Junyo even to bring Junyo/Hiyo in as a pair....I didn't see a need to accelerate them as USN unlikely to challenge KB in first 6 months. I also halted construction of most submarines except for half-dozen nearly complete float-plane subs

Doing all that allows you to accelerate all the CVs without adding additional Naval SY capacity....that gives you a large reinforcement of CVs just as the USN is also receiving CVs in 1943, and should keep the IJN competitive for longer

I don't think there is a cut and dry answer here....other than your builds (plane and ship and economy) should synergize with your overall game goals.

Some JFBs can use the super heavies really well...others not so much.

I have mirrored your strategy Q-ball in the past, and also done the exact opposite building the super heavies and submarines -- both strategies can work or really anything between.

Same holds true with CS-CV conversions. Here though I prefer to leave CS as CS and stuff them with float fighters....worked really well for me thru 43 into 44 but in 44+ I think having Sams on board a bit better...but again it depends upon what the strategies and game situation is. It is a long conversion

I can see the argument both ways. The CS Conversions are a whole subject to themselves! I can see the debate either way since they can be useful as CS and the conversion is very long, but they are clearly more useful in 1944 as CVL