RE: Naval and Defense News
Posted: Fri Jun 02, 2017 7:50 pm
Well, as an example with government regulations with Cell Phones, its in the regulation of the design. Cellular Systems have been designed since 2G days, to give Priority Access to government cell phone use, which even trumps E911 calls. If police, rescue, fire etc need it, its more important than teenage girls talking, and is more important that thousands of people calling E911 to report the same single occurrence emergency.
Therefore the government needs to regulate that civilian drone manufacturers must comply to a design which allows for easy detection and quick/safe hijacked/forced landing. But I think its stupid to not force "registration" of a drone. I have to register my SailBoat, and a civilian drone can more easily kill a lot of people than my 12m 8t vessel with a max speed of 7kt. We need to know who has them, and what type they are to better understand security risk.
Yes, I do not want someone on a terrorist watch list to be able to buy a drone, even at the expense of alerting the person that they are on such a watchlist.
Therefore the government needs to regulate that civilian drone manufacturers must comply to a design which allows for easy detection and quick/safe hijacked/forced landing. But I think its stupid to not force "registration" of a drone. I have to register my SailBoat, and a civilian drone can more easily kill a lot of people than my 12m 8t vessel with a max speed of 7kt. We need to know who has them, and what type they are to better understand security risk.
Yes, I do not want someone on a terrorist watch list to be able to buy a drone, even at the expense of alerting the person that they are on such a watchlist.

