Page 116 of 176
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:39 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: michaelbaldur
ORIGINAL: brian brian
ORIGINAL: warspite1
Warspite1
The cargo was from IKEA; flat-pack tanks I believe.
I'm sure that would have been just the ticket for the Allies in the first half of the war, when their tank designers had nothing to write home about....and make for some darn interesting Squad Leader counters too.
Anyhow the details about my two questions are in my new thread about WWII books.
bofors AA guns ???
Warspite1
I'd guess ball bearings and other high tech steel products [:D]
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:48 am
by Orm
ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: michaelbaldur
ORIGINAL: brian brian
I'm sure that would have been just the ticket for the Allies in the first half of the war, when their tank designers had nothing to write home about....and make for some darn interesting Squad Leader counters too.
Anyhow the details about my two questions are in my new thread about WWII books.
bofors AA guns ???
Warspite1
I'd guess ball bearings and other high tech steel products [:D]
Gold from the Norwegian gold reserve?
Edit: If they had moved gold it would have made for a nice movie.
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 9:15 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Orm
ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: michaelbaldur
bofors AA guns ???
Warspite1
I'd guess ball bearings and other high tech steel products [:D]
Gold from the Norwegian gold reserve?
Edit: If they had moved gold it would have made for a nice movie.
Warspite1
[X(]
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:01 pm
by brian brian
I think the Norwegian gold evacuated safely and simply along with the King on a Royal Navy cruiser. A lot of other countries' gold probably went through more adventures. Sounds like a good topic for a book...
In August 1944 a German U-Boat sank a US Liberty Ship off the coast of Oman. Aside from a complement of Lend-Lease supplies (tanks, trucks, etc.) destined for the Soviet Union via the Persian railroads, this Liberty ship carried several tons of a cargo several orders of magnitude more valuable than the vehicles in it's hold. What was this extra cargo?
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 4:43 pm
by Centuur
I've read somewhere about a cargo of industrial diamonds being sunk by a German U Boat. Don't know if this is the ship...
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 5:02 pm
by brian brian
interesting answer I hope to learn about someday, but not the cargo I had in mind.
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 5:34 pm
by composer99
A captured Enigma machine?
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 5:44 pm
by brian brian
Another interesting guess, but those never left an Allied mainland. By valuable, I do mean in terms of $$$.
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 12:49 am
by Orm
A huge amount of dollar bills?
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 2:22 pm
by brian brian
Pretty close there Orm. The cargo was 5 million silver Riyals, the currency of Saudi Arabia, though minted in the USA and destined for Saudi Arabia to use for payroll for the workers building the new oil fields for the US/Saudi joint venture ARAMCO. Almost 2 million of them were salvaged from 1.5 miles deep in the late 90s; a book that came out then theorized conspiratorially that they were somehow destined for Joe Stalin, thought I can't remember the author's exact argument in the book "Stalin's Silver". Given the value of the ARAMCO fields, I'm sure Uncle Sam just minted another batch for one of the true prizes of the world in the 1940s...
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 9:12 pm
by ezzler
Who said ""Never were so few led by so many"
and why?
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:25 pm
by Shannon V. OKeets
ORIGINAL: ezz
Who said ""Never were so few led by so many"
and why?
Vague memories, ... In Arnhem when the British had a preponderance of officiers to enlisted men?
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Sun Oct 23, 2011 10:56 pm
by ezzler
Ohh..close.Definitely on the right track.
But wrong battle and not British.
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 11:41 am
by micheljq
ORIGINAL: ezz
Who said ""Never were so few led by so many"
and why?
Churchill about the battle over England in 1940 I think. About the pilots of the fighter aircrafts? Or do i mixup because of my bad english.
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:48 pm
by terje439
Was not that the general of the 101 airborne? General something something...
Think after the initial landing during Overlord he only managed to find his staff and a few soldiers?
Terje
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Mon Oct 24, 2011 2:09 pm
by trooper76
terje is on the right track.
Maxwell Taylor of the 101st Airborne makes the remark. I saw it quoted in Ambrose's 'D-Day' though I'm not sure if that was the original source.
While Ambrose can tend to be a bit light on in-depth analysis and have a strong American bias his work on D-Day is just about unmatched for the amount of first-hand accounts of the battle. One of my favourite parts of the book are the dark humour displayed by soldiers/airmen/sailors participating in the battle. IIRC one of the Canadian soldiers remarks as they are taking fire approaching a beach 'I'm sorry is this a private beach? Are we intruding?'
Michael you are thinking of the quote 'Never was so much owed by so many to so few' ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Never_was_so_much_owed_by_so_many_to_so_few
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 12:39 pm
by ezzler
Troop is correct. General Maxwell Taylor of the 101st Airborne on June 6th 1944.
An odd assortment of men was culled from thorn-thick hedges and ditches along roads to storm Pouppeville. Division Commander, Chief of Staff, clerks, MPs, artillerymen, signalmen, a sprinkling of infantry parachutists -- all combined to form a task force against this village that blocked the entrance of a causeway leading from Utah Beach. So abundant were staff officers that Gen. Taylor remarked, "Never were so few led by so many."
http://www.lonesentry.com/gi_stories_bo ... tairborne/
And I did just read that in Anthony Beevor's D-Day book , which is excellent.
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:57 pm
by Extraneous

What was the USS Seraph’s other name ?

Why did it have another name?
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 12:12 am
by Blacksheep
USS Seraph was better know as HMS Seraph. She was actually a British sub used in special ops (i.e. operation Mincemeat, etc) but briefly served under US colors and a US captain on one of her missions.
RE: Next quiz
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 10:41 am
by Extraneous
Why did she serve under US colors?
1st clue: Generals Eisenhower and Clark.