Page 118 of 125

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 5:51 pm
by Zorachus99
ORIGINAL: paulderynck

Interesting... an idiot who can discern levels of comprehension.


Gave me quite a chuckle. [:D]


edit: I didn't mean to backhandedly insult you Warspite, instead I was commenting on how it seemed how your rage had attacked your grammar in such a way that was pure Horrorshow. Specifically, the Ludovico technique http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ludovico_Technique

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:21 pm
by WIF_Killzone
No comment, except, Warspite, thanks so much for all your hard work, Extraneaus, thanks for trying to make them perfect. Nuff said.

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 4:06 am
by Extraneous
ORIGINAL: warspite1

I could quite justifiably get a tad miffed at that comment. But I do not wish to fall out with you and so would instead ask you please to explain what exactly the issue is with the unit / units.

No I am not talking about the SNLF Force / Forces as clearly neither of us are experts and we have to agree to disagree.

I am talking about post 2327 and the latest subject of your ire and which has led to the latest unpleasantness.


Post 2327
ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: Extraneous

"the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) - which were generally deployed"

When using a singular subject you can't use "were".

You can use either
"the Japanese Special Naval Landing Forces (SNLF) - which were generally deployed" or
"the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) - which was generally deployed"

warspite1

I wasn't. I was talking about units. Please re-read the sentence.

Good catch on Guard (guard) though. I also prefer parachute to airborne too - I will amend.

I cannot explain this any clearer than this.

You cannot use a singular subject and then use a verb for a plural subject.

The Sentence

Due to the scale of World in Flames and the unit sizes in play, the depiction of units of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) - which were generally deployed in numbers smaller than a brigade - has to be necessarily ahistorical. It is right that these units are included within the game however.

Just for everyone's information: A brigade can be as large as two regiments with attached smaller units or as little as single battalion with attached smaller units.


What was deployed? Answer: The Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) units.

How were they deployed? Answer: In units of brigade size or smaller.

This makes the subject of the sentence: the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) units.



Which means that the sentence should be written:

In a Plural Format
the depiction of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Forces (SNLF) - which were generally deployed in units of brigade size smaller -

Or

In a Singular Format
the depiction of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) - which was generally deployed in units of brigade size smaller -



[:-] Don't get the idea I am yelling. I just need the bold font to highlight the information. [:-]

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 5:48 am
by paulderynck
ORIGINAL: Extraneous

You cannot use a singular subject and then use a verb for a plural subject.

The Sentence

Due to the scale of World in Flames and the unit sizes in play, the depiction of units of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) - which were generally deployed in numbers smaller than a brigade - has to be necessarily ahistorical. It is right that these units are included within the game however.

What was deployed? Answer: The Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) units.

How were they deployed? Answer: In units of brigade size or smaller.

This makes the subject of the sentence: the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) units.


Which means that the sentence should be written:

In a Plural Format
the depiction of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Forces (SNLF) - which were generally deployed in units of brigade size smaller -

Or

In a Singular Format
the depiction of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) - which was generally deployed in units of brigade size smaller -
Which is right?
1. The Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) units - which were generally deployed in numbers smaller than a brigade etc.
Or
2. the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) units - which was generally deployed in numbers smaller than a brigade etc.

You've conveniently left out the word "units" in your format examples. (Likely because you're still fixated on your pointless preoccupation with whether they were a Force or they were Forces.)

And yet you say yourself the subject of the sentence is "the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) units" which can just as easily be expressed as: "the units of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force" and thus the correct way to write it is: "the units of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force which were generally deployed... etc." And indeed in post 2327 Warspite stated clearly he was talking about "units", and indeed that's how he correctly wrote his draft.

Isn't there somewhere else you can go to practice your innate brand of ludicrous non-esoterica?

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 6:49 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Extraneous
ORIGINAL: warspite1

I could quite justifiably get a tad miffed at that comment. But I do not wish to fall out with you and so would instead ask you please to explain what exactly the issue is with the unit / units.

No I am not talking about the SNLF Force / Forces as clearly neither of us are experts and we have to agree to disagree.

I am talking about post 2327 and the latest subject of your ire and which has led to the latest unpleasantness.


Post 2327
ORIGINAL: warspite1
ORIGINAL: Extraneous

"the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) - which were generally deployed"

When using a singular subject you can't use "were".

You can use either
"the Japanese Special Naval Landing Forces (SNLF) - which were generally deployed" or
"the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) - which was generally deployed"

warspite1

I wasn't. I was talking about units. Please re-read the sentence.

Good catch on Guard (guard) though. I also prefer parachute to airborne too - I will amend.

I cannot explain this any clearer than this.

You cannot use a singular subject and then use a verb for a plural subject.

The Sentence

Due to the scale of World in Flames and the unit sizes in play, the depiction of units of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) - which were generally deployed in numbers smaller than a brigade - has to be necessarily ahistorical. It is right that these units are included within the game however.

Just for everyone's information: A brigade can be as large as two regiments with attached smaller units or as little as single battalion with attached smaller units.


What was deployed? Answer: The Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) units.

How were they deployed? Answer: In units of brigade size or smaller.

This makes the subject of the sentence: the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) units.



Which means that the sentence should be written:

In a Plural Format
the depiction of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Forces (SNLF) - which were generally deployed in units of brigade size smaller -

Or

In a Singular Format
the depiction of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) - which was generally deployed in units of brigade size smaller -



[:-] Don't get the idea I am yelling. I just need the bold font to highlight the information. [:-]
warspite1

Okay, I think I see the confusion.

My sentence:

Due to the scale of World in Flames and the unit sizes in play, the depiction of units of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) - which were generally deployed in numbers smaller than a brigade - has to be necessarily ahistorical. It is right that these units are included within the game however.

Your further clarification (with my responses in bold and "units" underlined).

What was deployed? Answer: The Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) units. Correct. I am trying to explain how World In Flames can use SNLF units, when those units were, in reality, never operated in anything more than a brigade strength. I am not therefore talking about the SNLF as a whole here – but the component parts.

How were they deployed? Answer: In units of brigade size or smaller. Correct as per above.

This makes the subject of the sentence: the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) units. Correct. I am talking about the 1st Kure or the 2nd Yokosuka or whatever.

Where I believe your version is wrong is that when you then provide the sentence you have missed off the first part – and it is that first part that defines whether Were or Was is appropriate.

So if we remove the contentious issue of the SNLForce or SNLForces and look again at the sentence I hope you can see that what I have done is correct – it’s the depiction of UNITS of the SNLF – which were….. I cannot say UNITS of the SNLF which was.

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 5:56 pm
by Zorachus99
Why not change the wording to reflect that these units were elite, and were rarely operated above brigade strength?

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 4:33 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Zorachus99

Why not change the wording to reflect that these units were elite, and were rarely operated above brigade strength?
warspite1

I have mentioned that they were elite in the write-up. I also mentioned that they operated in brigade strength or less, and which is why their use in World In Flames is ahistorical.

Apart from the Force / Forces issue (which no one seems to have a definitive answer on - I even asked in the WITP-AE forum and the answers there seemed to indicate I was correct (but not conclusively)) I do not believe there is any issue with the sentence I wrote.

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 11:29 am
by Extraneous
ORIGINAL: paulderynck (the troll)

Which is right?
1. The Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) units - which were generally deployed in numbers smaller than a brigade etc.
Or
2. the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) units - which was generally deployed in numbers smaller than a brigade etc.

You've conveniently left out the word "units" in your format examples. (Likely because you're still fixated on your pointless preoccupation with whether they were a Force or they were Forces.)

And yet you say yourself the subject of the sentence is "the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) units" which can just as easily be expressed as: "the units of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force" and thus the correct way to write it is: "the units of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force which were generally deployed... etc." And indeed in post 2327 Warspite stated clearly he was talking about "units", and indeed that's how he correctly wrote his draft.

Isn't there somewhere else you can go to practice your innate brand of ludicrous non-esoterica?

Troll ~ a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either accidentally or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.


Its called editing. Both are right. I left it up to the writer as to which one they prefer while trying to maintain their stream of thought as I understood his writing.

Still having problems finding a subject to write about paulderynck (the troll)? Please note the small "t" your a small Troll not even worthy of contempt.

As for "Isn't there somewhere else you can go to practice your innate brand of ludicrous non-esoterica?" read my post on the Beta testers forum.

Author: Mziln.
Keyword: proofreading.


ORIGINAL: warspite1

warspite1

Okay, I think I see the confusion.

My sentence:

Due to the scale of World in Flames and the unit sizes in play, the depiction of units of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) - which were generally deployed in numbers smaller than a brigade - has to be necessarily ahistorical. It is right that these units are included within the game however.

Your further clarification (with my responses in bold and "units" underlined).

What was deployed? Answer: The Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) units. Correct. I am trying to explain how World In Flames can use SNLF units, when those units were, in reality, never operated in anything more than a brigade strength. I am not therefore talking about the SNLF as a whole here – but the component parts.

How were they deployed? Answer: In units of brigade size or smaller. Correct as per above.

This makes the subject of the sentence: the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) units. Correct. I am talking about the 1st Kure or the 2nd Yokosuka or whatever.

Where I believe your version is wrong is that when you then provide the sentence you have missed off the first part – and it is that first part that defines whether Were or Was is appropriate.

So if we remove the contentious issue of the SNLF Force or SNLF Forces and look again at the sentence I hope you can see that what I have done is correct – it’s the depiction of UNITS of the SNLF – which were….. I cannot say UNITS of the SNLF which was.

Breaking down the sentence

1. Due to the scale of World in Flames and the unit sizes in play,
2. the depiction of units of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) - which were generally deployed in numbers smaller than a brigade -
3. has to be necessarily ahistorical. It is right that these units are included within the game however.

Part 1 and 3 were left intact so if you agree there is no reason to discuss them.


2.
A. the depiction of units of
B. the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) -
C. which were generally deployed in numbers smaller than a brigade -


The singular format refers to the SNLF as a individual unit versus the plural format which refers to all the units within the SNLF.


A and B as you have said is your subject. But you have reversed their order by using "of units of" this is cumbersome. That is why I edited it to either...

The Singular Format (meaning the SNLF): "the depiction of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF)"
or
The Plural Format (all the SNLF units): "the depiction of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Forces (SNLF)".

Leaving it up to you to make your choice.

C.
If you use "The Singular Format (meaning the SNLF)" it must be "which was" not "which were".
If you use "The Plural Format (all the SNLF units)" it remains "which were".

"generally deployed in numbers smaller than a brigade -" this is ambiguous. You could be writing about numbers of troops, units, or anything. I took it as units due to your mention of units at the beginning of the sentence. To maintain your string of thought I edited it to "which was generally deployed in units of a brigade or smaller -" or "which were generally deployed in units of a brigade or smaller -"


Which would give you a choice of:
The Singular Format (meaning the SNLF): "Due to the scale of World in Flames and the unit sizes in play, the depiction of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF or Tokubetsu Rikusentai) - which was generally deployed in units of a brigade or smaller - has to be necessarily ahistorical."
or
The Plural Format (all the SNLF units): "Due to the scale of World in Flames and the unit sizes in play, the depiction of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Forces (SNLF or Tokubetsu Rikusentai) - which were generally deployed in units of a brigade or smaller - has to be necessarily ahistorical."


"Tokubetsu Rikusentai" was placed at the first mention of the SNLF in the description since it defines all SNLF units.


RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2013 5:33 pm
by paulderynck
ORIGINAL: Extraneous

Troll ~ a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either accidentally or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 2:52 am
by Extraneous
ORIGINAL: paulderynck
ORIGINAL: Extraneous

Troll ~ a person who sows discord on the Internet by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either accidentally or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.

And how did I know that your thoughts would fixate on that particular word paulderynck (the troll) [>:]

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 5:09 am
by paulderynck
Same way I knew why you chose it as your pseudonym.

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:35 am
by Extraneous
ORIGINAL: paulderynck

Same way I knew why you chose it as your pseudonym.

Your still unable to pick a subject to post on the forums I see.

Who did you schmooze to get on the Beta? Let me guess someone from the Yahoo Group.

You sure didn't do any write ups that I can remember.


My experence with proofreading comes from taking Offset Printing when I was in high school (it was an elective) along with being a professional Offset printer.

Just for fun just what is your experence with proofreading? Any? Some? None?

[:D] I'll bet its none. [:D]



If you couldn't find my post on the Beta forums try proofread as a keyword.



[:D] You don't know why I chose "Extraneous" as a handle your too young [:D]

I chose it when I had a 14400 bit modem.


Since you tried to instruct me to do somthing.

I.E. Isn't there somewhere else you can go to practice your innate brand of ludicrous non-esoterica?

I feal it only fair for me to instruct you to do somthing.

Why don't you drag your little troll self under a bridge and wait for the brothers Billy Goat Gruff.

A childs story for a troll child like you. [:'(]


RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 9:50 am
by Orm
Could we move on now, please?

I am sure that there are more unit descriptions that needs improvement and attention.

And lets leave the trolls buried below the bridge where they belong. Because I have yet to see a troll here and I do not want to see one either. [:D]

So please be nice and move on. [:)]

Pretty please.

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 10:32 am
by Extraneous
Moving on as requested.

warspite 1 post #: 2311

warspite 1 post #: 2323


Warspite1 refers to 1st SNLF Div and 2nd SNLF Div.

What he means is 1st SNLF and 2nd SNLF division counters. I hope your write ups don't show them as actual Divisions.

In military terms there are Divisions and divisions:
Divisions ~ consist of two or more brigades or regiments. Division is abbreviated as Div.
divisions ~ consist of two Companies.

In WiF a division counter represents any unit of Division size or smaller.

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 4:41 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Extraneous

Moving on as requested.

warspite 1 post #: 2311

warspite 1 post #: 2323


Warspite1 refers to 1st SNLF Div and 2nd SNLF Div.

What he means is 1st SNLF and 2nd SNLF division counters. I hope your write ups don't show them as actual Divisions.

In military terms there are Divisions and divisions:
Divisions ~ consist of two or more brigades or regiments. Division is abbreviated as Div.
divisions ~ consist of two Companies.

In WiF a division counter represents any unit of Division size or smaller.
warspite1
Warspite1 refers to 1st SNLF Div and 2nd SNLF Div.

Yes I do, because in game terms, there are counters for the 1st SNLF Division and the 2nd SNLF Division. It is as divisions (in addition to the one corps counter) that ADG portray the SNLF units in the game.
What he means is 1st SNLF and 2nd SNLF division counters.

No, I mean 1st SNLF Division and 2nd SNLF Division (as they are portrayed in the game, as per the above).
I hope your write ups don't show them as actual Divisions.

No they won't, the write up will once again explain that these are "what-if" counters as the SNLF never operated in divisional strength, and will provide some high level detail re campaigns and battles the various SNLF units fought in - as said, typically in battalion or brigade strength only.
In military terms there are Divisions and divisions:
Divisions ~ consist of two or more brigades or regiments. Division is abbreviated as Div.
divisions ~ consist of two Companies.

No I think its just capital D if you are naming a specific division or lower case if you are talking about divisions generally. e.g.

"the corps contained two infantry divisions and an armoured division"
or
"the corps consisted of the 43rd (Wessex) Division, the 51st (Highland) Division and the 7th Armoured Division"

As I was talking about specific divisions when referring to the 1st and 2nd SNLF I used the capital D (albeit that they are only real divisions in the game).
In WiF a division counter represents any unit of Division size or smaller.

Yes I think (iirc - but may be wrong) that artillery when first introduced back in the nineties were shown as brigades i.e. X. The rules still state that "Every brigade size unit is treated as if it were a division", but this statement is probably now redundant as there are no brigades?? [perhaps one of the grognards can clarify?]. Either way, as these SNLF divisions are shown as divisions it would only complicate things to start calling them not divisions!!! I think - but now I'm confused [:D][:)][8D]

Edit: to clarify the 3rd and 4th point

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 2:48 pm
by warspite1
And here is the 1st SNLF Division counter write-up:


[2171] [Japanese 1st Special Naval Landing Force Marine - by Robert Jenkins]
.P Due to the scale of World in Flames and the unit sizes in play, the depiction of units of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) – which were generally deployed in numbers smaller than a brigade - has to be necessarily ahistorical. It is right that these units are included within the game however, and World in Flames allows the Japanese player to build one SNLF corps and two divisions.
.P This counter represents a fictional 1st SNLF Division, while counter 2172 depicts an equally fictional, 2nd SNLF Division. The corps unit appears on counter 2175.
.P During World War II the Japanese did not operate an autonomous marine branch in the way that their US counterparts did. However they did make use of naval troops. Such troops were used to land at vital points – often ahead of a larger force – to seize key objectives.
.P The forerunners of the SNLF (Kaigun Tokubetsu Rikusentai) were used for the first time during the fighting against Russia at the start of the 20th Century. Having proved their worth there and later in Manchuria, the Japanese began raising SNLF units at each of their four main naval bases. Counter 2175 provides a list of the main SNLF units that were available in December 1941.
.P As said above these units, which ranged in size from 750 to 1,600 men, were operated mostly individually, although on a few occasions units were combined.
.P The SNLF were used as elite infantry in the early stages of the Pacific War and were involved in almost all the early campaigns as the Japanese seized one objective after another and inflicted defeat after defeat upon the Allies.
.P Trying to piece together a definitive list of all the SNLFs, their numbers, their deployments and their ultimate fate is next to impossible. However the list below gives an indication of the main operations undertaken by these elite units.
.B Conquest of the Philippines - 1,400 men of the 1st Kure SNLF, and a similar number from the 2nd, took part in the invasion of the Philippines in December 1941.
.B Conquest of the Dutch East Indies - 3,500 men of the combined 1st and 2nd Sasebo SNLFs combined with the 850-strong, parachute-trained 1st Yokosuka SNLF to capture the island of Celebes in March 1942. The 2nd Kure SNLF took part in the earlier Battle of Tarakan.
.B Conquest of Timor - 850 men of the 3rd Yokosuka SNLF were parachuted onto the island.
.B Conquest of Borneo - 750 men from the 2nd Yokosuka SNLF landed on British-owned Borneo in December 1941.
.B Guam - 370 men of the 2nd Maizuru SNLF assisted the capture of Guam in December 1941.
.B Wake Island - 450 men from the 2nd Maizuru SNLF attacked, and were repulsed by, US the US Marine garrison in December 1941. Reinforcements were used for the second attempt later that month, in which 1,000 men from the 2nd Maizuru were deployed - this time successfully.
.B Midway - had the Battle of Midway gone as planned for the Japanese, a mixed force of navy and army troops would have attempted to seize the island. The navy troops would have been provided by the 2,800 men of the 2nd Combined SNLF, made up of the 5th Kure and 5th Yokosuka SNLFs.
.B New Guinea - Elements from the 3rd and 5th Kure, 5th Yokosuka and 5th Sasebo SNLFs (1,500 men) took part in the Battle of Milne Bay in September 1942. This was one of the first defeats inflicted on the Japanese in a land battle.
.B The Solomons - Elements of the 3rd Kure SNLF took part in the initial landing in the Solomon Islands (May 1942). After the American landing on Guadalcanal in August 1942, many SNLF units were dragged into the hopeless fight for the island chain and were bled white, including the 7th Kure, 4th Maizuru, 6th Sasebo and 5th Yokosuka.
.B Defence of the Gilbert Islands - 1,112 men of the 6th Yokosuka SNLF (re-named the 3rd Special Base Defence Force) and 1,497 men of the 7th Sasebo SNLF were wiped out, almost to a man, while defending Tarawa Atoll in November 1943.
.B Defence of the Marianas - Both of the parachute-trained Yokosuka SNLFs (1st and 3rd (merged into the 1st)) were destroyed defending Saipan in June 1944.

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 6:34 pm
by warspite1
I am working on the three Kiwi land units and here is an outline of the Auckland Militia counter:

[2009] [New Zealand Auckland Militia - by Robert Jenkins]
.P "With gratitude to the past, and with confidence in the future, we range ourselves without fear beside Britain. Where she goes we go. Where she stands, we stand". These were the words of Mickey Savage, the Prime Minister of New Zealand, in September 1939. They were uttered on the 5th of that month, 2 days after the British declaration of War on Germany.
.P The write up for this counter honours the men and women of this sparsely populated, relatively small country, located on the other side of the world and 11,000 miles from the United Kingdom - the "mother country" to which Mr Savage pledged allegiance.
.P Ask yourself this question; which Allied power, after the United Kingdom, spent the most (as a % of its national income) during the war? Yes, it was New Zealand.
.P Other facts:
.B Population in 1939 - 1.6m
.B No. of men and women who served in fighting formations - 140,000 (155,000 in total)
.B War dead - 11,928
.B War dead as a ratio to population (per million) was the highest of all the Commonwealth countries - 6,684.
.P New Zealanders fought in all the main campaigns of World War II alongside their Commonwealth brothers:
.B The first major naval engagement featured a cruiser from the New Zealand Squadron of the Royal Navy - HMS (later HMNZS) Achilles.
.B 135 pilots fought in the Battle of Britain.
.B A New Zealander, Charles Hazlitt Upham, is the only combat soldier to have won the Victoria Cross (the highest award for bravery in the face of the enemy available to most Commonwealth countries) twice.
.B Three other New Zealanders won the award in World War II, all airmen: Leonard Trent (RNZAF), Lloyd Trigg (RAF) and James Ward (RNZAF).
.B New Zealanders fought with distinction in the Western Desert and in Italy.
.P New Zealand was vital to the viability of the United Kingdom in a way that is less than well known. The dominion was able to help keep Britain fed during the war, initially exporting all of her surplus food to the UK. In 1943-44 calls upon her foodstuffs became acute - the US forces in the Pacific needing feeding and British supplies were critically low. As a result, the New Zealand 3rd Division was disbanded to allow more manpower to return to the land to help resolve the crisis.

Need to flesh this out somewhat - anybody got any good NZ facts to add?

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 9:50 am
by Smokey2
Warspite

Don't know if this is what you are looking for. It is a summary description of the Territorial Forces raised by NZ. It excludes the 2NZEF (2nd New Zealand Expeditionary Force) forces that saw action in Nth Africa and Italy (2nd New Zealand Division – initially the New Zealand Division) and the Pacific (3rd New Zealand Division)

As part of the preparations for the possible outbreak of war in the Pacific, the defensive forces stationed in New Zealand were expanded in late 1941. On 1 November three new brigade headquarters were raised (taking the total in the New Zealand Army to seven), and three divisional headquarters were established to coordinate the units located in the Northern, Central and Southern Military Districts.
• The division in the Northern Military District was designated the Northern Division, and comprised the 1st and 12th Brigade Groups. The 1st Brigade Group had been formed prior to World War II, and the 12th Brigade Group was one of the new headquarters; both these units were part of the Territorial Force and were manned by part-time reservists.
• The division in the Central Military District was designated the Central Division, and comprised the 2nd Infantry Brigade and 7th Brigade Group.
• The division in the Southern Military District was designated the Southern Division, and comprised the 3rd and10th Brigades, and the 11th Brigade Group.
• [Give the Kiwis kudos for their imaginative divisional naming system][:D]
The New Zealand Army was further expanded following the outbreak of the Pacific War. The Territorial Force was fully mobilised on 10 January 1942, and reinforced by 7000 men who had originally enlisted in the New Zealand Expeditionary Force for overseas service. The role of the Territorial Force was to counter any Japanese landings in New Zealand, and it was organised into both mobile and fortress units. The Home Guard would support the Territorial units in the event of an invasion.

About April 1942 the three divisions stationed in New Zealand were transformed into mobile formations and renamed, and the Northern Division became the 1st Division; the Central Division became the 4th Division and the Southern Division became the 5th Division respectively. Until September Territorial Force units across New Zealand were held at eight days notice to respond to an invasion, and defensive positions along the country's coastline were permanently manned.

The forces stationed in New Zealand were considerably reduced as the threat of invasion passed. During early 1943 each of the three home defence divisions were cut from 22,358 to 11,530 men. The non-divisional units suffered even greater reductions. The New Zealand Government ordered a general stand-down of the defensive forces in the country on 28 June, which led to further reductions in the strength of units and a lower state of readiness. By the end of the year almost all of the Territorial Force personnel had been demobilised (though they retained their uniforms and equipment), and only 44 soldiers were posted to the three divisional and seven brigade headquarters. As the war situation continued to improve almost all the remaining Territorial Force units were disbanded on 1 April 1944.

Smokey

RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 9:55 am
by Extraneous
ORIGINAL: warspite1

And here is the 1st SNLF Division counter write-up:


[2171] [Japanese 1st Special Naval Landing Force Marine - by Robert Jenkins]
.P Due to the scale of World in Flames and the unit sizes in play, the depiction of units of the Japanese Special Naval Landing Force (SNLF) – which were generally deployed in numbers smaller than a brigade - has to be necessarily ahistorical. It is right that these units are included within the game however, and World in Flames allows the Japanese player to build one SNLF corps and two divisions.
.P This counter represents a fictional 1st SNLF Division, while counter 2172 depicts an equally fictional, 2nd SNLF Division. The corps unit appears on counter 2175.
.P During World War II the Japanese did not operate an autonomous marine branch in the way that their US counterparts did. However they did make use of naval troops. Such troops were used to land at vital points – often ahead of a larger force – to seize key objectives.
.P The forerunners of the SNLF (Kaigun Tokubetsu Rikusentai) were used for the first time during the fighting against Russia at the start of the 20th Century. Having proved their worth there and later in Manchuria, the Japanese began raising SNLF units at each of their four main naval bases. Counter 2175 provides a list of the main SNLF units that were available in December 1941.
.P As said above these units, which ranged in size from 750 to 1,600 men, were operated mostly individually, although on a few occasions units were combined.
.P The SNLF were used as elite infantry in the early stages of the Pacific War and were involved in almost all the early campaigns as the Japanese seized one objective after another and inflicted defeat after defeat upon the Allies.
.P Trying to piece together a definitive list of all the SNLFs, their numbers, their deployments and their ultimate fate is next to impossible. However the list below gives an indication of the main operations undertaken by these elite units.
.B Conquest of the Philippines - 1,400 men of the 1st Kure SNLF, and a similar number from the 2nd, took part in the invasion of the Philippines in December 1941.
.B Conquest of the Dutch East Indies - 3,500 men of the combined 1st and 2nd Sasebo SNLFs combined with the 850-strong, parachute-trained 1st Yokosuka SNLF to capture the island of Celebes in March 1942. The 2nd Kure SNLF took part in the earlier Battle of Tarakan.
.B Conquest of Timor - 850 men of the 3rd Yokosuka SNLF were parachuted onto the island.
.B Conquest of Borneo - 750 men from the 2nd Yokosuka SNLF landed on British-owned Borneo in December 1941.
.B Guam - 370 men of the 2nd Maizuru SNLF assisted the capture of Guam in December 1941.
.B Wake Island - 450 men from the 2nd Maizuru SNLF attacked, and were repulsed by, US the US Marine garrison in December 1941. Reinforcements were used for the second attempt later that month, in which 1,000 men from the 2nd Maizuru were deployed - this time successfully.
.B Midway - had the Battle of Midway gone as planned for the Japanese, a mixed force of navy and army troops would have attempted to seize the island. The navy troops would have been provided by the 2,800 men of the 2nd Combined SNLF, made up of the 5th Kure and 5th Yokosuka SNLFs.
.B New Guinea - Elements from the 3rd and 5th Kure, 5th Yokosuka and 5th Sasebo SNLFs (1,500 men) took part in the Battle of Milne Bay in September 1942. This was one of the first defeats inflicted on the Japanese in a land battle.
.B The Solomons - Elements of the 3rd Kure SNLF took part in the initial landing in the Solomon Islands (May 1942). After the American landing on Guadalcanal in August 1942, many SNLF units were dragged into the hopeless fight for the island chain and were bled white, including the 7th Kure, 4th Maizuru, 6th Sasebo and 5th Yokosuka.
.B Defence of the Gilbert Islands - 1,112 men of the 6th Yokosuka SNLF (re-named the 3rd Special Base Defence Force) and 1,497 men of the 7th Sasebo SNLF were wiped out, almost to a man, while defending Tarawa Atoll in November 1943.
.B Defence of the Marianas - Both of the parachute-trained Yokosuka SNLFs (1st and 3rd (merged into the 1st)) were destroyed defending Saipan in June 1944.

Did you know I still have the original information that was submitted on the SNLF?


RE: Unit Descriptions: Air, Naval, Land

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 3:12 pm
by Shannon V. OKeets
ORIGINAL: Smokey2

Warspite

Don't know if this is what you are looking for. It is a summary description of the Territorial Forces raised by NZ. It excludes the 2NZEF (2nd New Zealand Expeditionary Force) forces that saw action in Nth Africa and Italy (2nd New Zealand Division – initially the New Zealand Division) and the Pacific (3rd New Zealand Division)

As part of the preparations for the possible outbreak of war in the Pacific, the defensive forces stationed in New Zealand were expanded in late 1941. On 1 November three new brigade headquarters were raised (taking the total in the New Zealand Army to seven), and three divisional headquarters were established to coordinate the units located in the Northern, Central and Southern Military Districts.
• The division in the Northern Military District was designated the Northern Division, and comprised the 1st and 12th Brigade Groups. The 1st Brigade Group had been formed prior to World War II, and the 12th Brigade Group was one of the new headquarters; both these units were part of the Territorial Force and were manned by part-time reservists.
• The division in the Central Military District was designated the Central Division, and comprised the 2nd Infantry Brigade and 7th Brigade Group.
• The division in the Southern Military District was designated the Southern Division, and comprised the 3rd and10th Brigades, and the 11th Brigade Group.
• [Give the Kiwis kudos for their imaginative divisional naming system][:D]
The New Zealand Army was further expanded following the outbreak of the Pacific War. The Territorial Force was fully mobilised on 10 January 1942, and reinforced by 7000 men who had originally enlisted in the New Zealand Expeditionary Force for overseas service. The role of the Territorial Force was to counter any Japanese landings in New Zealand, and it was organised into both mobile and fortress units. The Home Guard would support the Territorial units in the event of an invasion.

About April 1942 the three divisions stationed in New Zealand were transformed into mobile formations and renamed, and the Northern Division became the 1st Division; the Central Division became the 4th Division and the Southern Division became the 5th Division respectively. Until September Territorial Force units across New Zealand were held at eight days notice to respond to an invasion, and defensive positions along the country's coastline were permanently manned.

The forces stationed in New Zealand were considerably reduced as the threat of invasion passed. During early 1943 each of the three home defence divisions were cut from 22,358 to 11,530 men. The non-divisional units suffered even greater reductions. The New Zealand Government ordered a general stand-down of the defensive forces in the country on 28 June, which led to further reductions in the strength of units and a lower state of readiness. By the end of the year almost all of the Territorial Force personnel had been demobilised (though they retained their uniforms and equipment), and only 44 soldiers were posted to the three divisional and seven brigade headquarters. As the war situation continued to improve almost all the remaining Territorial Force units were disbanded on 1 April 1944.

Smokey
Do you have a source for this description?