RE: RHS Level II Update 2.44 (Art, Eratta)
Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 10:38 am
Hi badlandz, I would post here the upgrade path problem you are having so Sid can look at it....GP
What's your Strategy?
https://forums.matrixgames.com:443/
ORIGINAL: m10bob
Sid...Do the weather data files need to be manually moved anywhere as well?
ORIGINAL: Badlandz
Hello
Question about air groups in the data base for RHS. I think there may be an issue with a few air squadrons.
When they split or disband/withdraw their parent unit shows up in the list of reinforcements with a 1 day delay. The new unit has the next upgrade of aircraft even if not yet available. By example: VMO-251, unit 2631. In December 1941 I upgrade the unit to F4F-7. Then split it. This produces 3 units VMO-251/A, B and C. Then next day VMO-251 arrives as reinforcement with 2 F4U-1D. So, you end up with 4 units of VMO-251, 3 fragments and one whole.
This seems to happen also when you withdraw some units. Squadrons of the 27th BG USAAF return immediately with B-24D.
Am I miss understanding something?
Thanks
Yes, you always understand my questions and always answer in detail.ORIGINAL: el cid again
I assume weather files refers to the seasonal pwhexe.dat files.
At this time the "weather files" are not very up to date.
I did make them work for Level II, but have not yet put into
them all the technical changes I have added to the start of game
file in the last three months. So if you use them, you will find
some places not working as they should.
If you are playing a game and the date moves into a new season, you
need to rename a file for that season to pwhexe.dat and put it in the top
level AE folder.
If you reach Winter, 1942 (or any later year) you ALSO need to rename and move
a pwzlink.dat file into the top level AE folder.
In both cases KEEP the file you rename in the source folder.
In theory you also move new map art at the same time. Some of that art exists.
If you need it, ask for it.
In theory, I am going to write - or have someone write - a 'switcher' program
- similar to what we had in WITP era RHS. This will move all the files needed
by date.
In RHS some things change with time.
1) Rivers become frozen, or unfrozen, etc.
2) Arctic ice recedes, or moves South.
3) Roads and railroads get built (or rarely, unbuilt).
4) Trails disappear in the jungle in Monsoon
5) Ice roads and ice trails that exist in Winter disappear
in other seasons.
6) Special cases exist for river navigation. The most strange,
perhaps, is that there is TOO MUCH water on the upper Irrawaddy
in Spring - so it isn't navigable then! Most rivers have more
navigable length in Monsoon and/or Fall seasons.
ORIGINAL: m10bob
Sid...Do the weather data files need to be manually moved anywhere as well?
ORIGINAL: m10bob
All is working fine..Really appreciate General Patton for telling me where those map files had to be placed!
Will Midwest USA get a port?
ORIGINAL: el cid again
RHS maximizes players options in the extreme. If at all possible, a unit has a command you
can change using political points. As well, the political point allocation is very generous.
However, there are political and sometimes other reasons some units must be restricted.
These units often will not return at all (see the Philippine Army, the KNIL Army, the Malay
Army, etc). Those that will - such as you mention - will still be restricted when they return.
Australia is a mixed bag. SOME militia units can deploy overseas (although most of those didn't do
so early on). Many can never leave. It was part of the deal when you signed up - especially early
on: you knew the AIF was going overseas - but the AMF was not going to do that. Clearly Australia
needs to have some defense forces. Left free to move, most players would strip the sub-continent
and leave it with nothing but minimum garrison units. So while we have mitigated the original
design in favor of more units able to deploy, we never intended to make them all able to do so.
ORIGINAL: el cid again
It is alleged there was never a landing by critics of the movie Australia. What is the site and date of the landing?
ORIGINAL: m10bob
ORIGINAL: el cid again
It is alleged there was never a landing by critics of the movie Australia. What is the site and date of the landing?
http://www.ozatwar.com/japsland/japsland.htm
and here is the site for a German U Boat south of Australia.
http://www.ozatwar.com/subsoz.htm
ORIGINAL: el cid again
It appears that an invasion was considered, but rejected on the basis that it needed too many troops
and shipping. It appears that no raids were considered or conducted. Reconnaissance is another matter.
Clearly there was air recon on several occasions - particularly related to the raid on Darwin. I would
not be surprised if there were other instances of submarine parties - as happened often in the North Atlantic.
A tale about German planting of automated weather stations (I heard from the son of one of the landing party
in the 1960s) was substantiated after the century turned. The Japanese would probably not be interested in that,
even if they had the technology, because weather stations must be West of the area you intend to operate in - and
Guadalcanal nixed the plans to operate and control places like New Caledonia and Fiji. [There is evidence of
interest in New Caledonia, and it is logical, and there was Japanese investment on the island giving them good
intelligence pre war.] I believe raids might be worthwhile, but not an invasion - a 'proper landing to stay'
as it were. On logistical grounds. I have seen invasions of Australia in RHS, but every one failed - even
when they started out looking good. By summer 1942 the Allied air power situation forces Japan into a contest
of attrition it cannot afford.
ORIGINAL: m10bob
ORIGINAL: el cid again
It is alleged there was never a landing by critics of the movie Australia. What is the site and date of the landing?
http://www.ozatwar.com/japsland/japsland.htm
and here is the site for a German U Boat south of Australia.
http://www.ozatwar.com/subsoz.htm
ORIGINAL: m10bob
From that website I hope you noticed the historical confirmation which lends credence to your inclusion of German "raiders" to RHS, to include the Orion, for example.
They operated west and south of Australia...which I found interesting. Likely they used "milch cows" for refueling.