Page 122 of 291
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:00 pm
by warspite1
No. The above is the screen I have.
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:02 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Is that correct?
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:04 pm
by rkr1958
My experience has been that CVPs that aren't aborted stay "flying" until the end of all the combat rounds. I admit that I don't know the rule but this seems logical to me. For example, in the Pacific, US carrier planes in the air whose carrier was hit would have to divert and land on another carrier. Isn't this the same thing?
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:10 pm
by warspite1
I see nothing in the rules that suggest otherwise.
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:12 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Ok. X on Ark Royal, thank you.
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:22 pm
by warspite1
Ark Royal is sunk
The Spanish cruiser Canarias suffers a boiler malfunction and has to abort.
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:30 pm
by warspite1
The two remaining FAA units return to the two remaining carriers and, as per previous instructions, the Axis stay - as do the CW.
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:31 pm
by warspite1
Hold on what the????? I have three e-mails here - two re-Ark Royal a minute apart and 1 on Canarias. Where the ???? did the middle roll come from?
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:39 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
I received two emails about Ark Royal. First one was 4, so she sinks. I thought second was a mistake.
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:40 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
No idea why second message was sent...
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:47 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer
I received two emails about Ark Royal. First one was 4, so she sinks. I thought second was a mistake.
warspite1
First one is timed 17:19 - a seven. Second is timed 17:20 and is a 4.

RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:49 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Both rolls were requested from same IP address. Did you click "send" button twice or something like that?
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:52 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Check times when rolls were generated. 1 second apart, 4 was generated first.
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:52 pm
by warspite1
Second one
As you can see timed a minute later

RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:53 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer
Check times when rolls were generated. 1 second apart, 4 was generated first.
warspite1
Where is that?
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:57 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
In picture above: big text on top.
I'm answering from phone, can't post a picture.
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 2:59 pm
by warspite1
Right I see it.
So what is happening here?
I ask the die roller to roll TO ALL PLAYERS as normal.
I then (apparently) ask for another roll one second later, again TO ALL PLAYERS but this second roll is received by my e-mail first and which I comment on in my post. I then deal with Canarias but meanwhile, while I am doing that, a second e-mail (which was apparently sent first) comes in???
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 3:24 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Oh now I read your text so that I undestand it after Ark Royal took a hit and it us damaged, not sink.
I had quite a hectic day until now.
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 3:26 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
PBE roller ask if you want results to email, on PBE page or both. I always choose both. Then I don't have to go read my email and I get result immediately.
RE: 4 player E-mail: A
Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2016 3:32 pm
by warspite1
Right the game will need re-working to include the sunk result but I'm too angry - not too mention thoroughly bemused - by all that nonsense to look at this now.
Frankly the loss of Ark Royal - after thinking I had dodged a bullet - is inconsequential compared to how this must look.
But a) As you can see, the first e-mail I received was the one I reported on, b) if this was some kind of cheat it would hardly make sense to send the e-mails to all parties c) for it to be a cheat I would have needed to see the 4 then that split second sent the second e-mail so I could use the 7 (because of course I knew the second e-mail would come first - and I knew the second e-mail would be a better throw).