Page 128 of 155
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sat Jul 29, 2017 10:20 pm
by ashkpa
Searches so far,
a) Central Pacific rolls of 4/7 (axis/allies) --> no combat
b) Arabian Sea rolls of 8/8 --> no combat
c) W. Indian Ocean rolls of 10/2 --> no combat
d) Marianas rolls of 1/7 result in combat (images below)
JP has 7 SP. Use 4 to select surface combat. Use 3 to select first target.
2X 2D 2A taken by the allies
X 2D taken by the axis
Allies first X is taken by the CV Enterprise (choosen by the JP). It makes it's damage control roll and is only damaged.
The USA gets to assign the other damage. I will then continue with the axis damage and round 2 if you are staying.

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 11:29 am
by rkr1958
1. X to CA Portland.
2. D to CA Houston.
3. D to CA Portland
4. A to Enterprise
5. A to Enterprise if not aborted; otherwise to a damaged CA.
The USN will not stay for a second round. Return all ships back to Pearl.
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 4:23 pm
by ashkpa
I altered instruction 3. I assumed you really did not want to have the damaged Portland make a D roll, so I applied to Baltimore.
You made all the damage control rolls except the 2nd A on the Enterprise, where failing meant nothing.
I decided, I'd rather have a damaged Yamato than a sunk other ship. Glad I made that decision when my first damage control roll was a 1.

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 4:40 pm
by ashkpa
North Atlantic Search rolls of 1/4 resulted in Italian sub engaging the convoys in the 0-box.
Net damaged sub and 2 CP destroyed.

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 4:49 pm
by ashkpa
Faeroes Gap the search rolls were 3/2, so both 3-boxes found each other with the CW having 1 SP point.
End result was the CA and both subs were aborted. (I moved the CA to Liverpool)

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 4:56 pm
by ashkpa
Last comes the E. Med
Image below shows what is there after the Axis moves and reactions.
Does the CW want to react the fighter on the Egyptian Coast to the zone (0 or 1 box)?

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 5:32 pm
by rkr1958
Yes, 2nd fighter will react to 0-box.
ORIGINAL: ashkpa
I altered instruction 3. I assumed you really did not want to have the damaged Portland make a D roll, so I applied to Baltimore.
You're right, I didn't want to apply a D to an already damaged CA. That was a mess up on my part. Thanks for correcting!
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 6:33 pm
by ashkpa
E. Med. Rnd 1 search rolls of 3/5 resulted in much of the axis force finding and engaging the 0-box with 6-SP.
Made it an Naval Air Battle (thought about surface). Used 2 SP to move my A-A up 1 and 4 SP to move yours down 2 for a net +/-2 on the chart.
First round went my way.
I determined that you would clear the weaker Italian Bomber and your lead fighter was shot down.
You appear to still be online, so I'll see if
you want to stay for round two of the air to air combat (if I don't hear in a bit, I'll assume yes. This is based on past instruction history).

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 7:10 pm
by rkr1958
Yes, the CW will stay for a second round of AA.
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 7:30 pm
by ashkpa
Round 2 went well for the axis. Cleared the GE NAV and shot down the second CW fighter. 2A was the result (less than I expected, I had forgotten the rain halved the A-S factorsJ). Aborted the CW CP and the weakest CA which failed it's damage control.
Last image in sequence below shows the status going into round 2 of the naval combat.
Will you stay?

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Sun Jul 30, 2017 11:30 pm
by rkr1958
Yes, the RN will remain with the objective of sinking/aborting the Italian CP and breaking supply to the Italians in Libya.
Bedtime now ... [>:] [>:] [>:]
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 12:01 am
by ashkpa
E Med Round 2, rolls of 3/5 result in allied finding and engaging the CW 3-box only.
Naval Air. 2 SP used to decrease AA to ne. And 2 SP used to increase damage to D 3A.
Applied first damage to BB. Damage roll of 7, aborted the BB (missed saving the correct image, sorry)
First A against the CA was failed, so both units are aborted.
3rd round searches were 9/10 and combat ended.
I aborted your ships to Suez. Feel free to move them elsewhere if desired.

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 12:03 am
by ashkpa
Last naval combat decision is in the Bismark Sea,
where the USA can initiate searches if they wish.

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 7:58 pm
by rkr1958
The US declines.
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 8:48 pm
by ashkpa
Three ground strikes. 2 with artillery and 1 with a plane. You can intercept. I have a Me109 that can counter-intercept.
Do you wish to fly?

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 11:06 pm
by rkr1958
Intercept. Fighter will target plane attempting the ground strike.
RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Mon Jul 31, 2017 11:26 pm
by ashkpa
ND42 i13 GS
Air to Air over GS cleared the bomber and then the Germans left the area.
Only one GS hit.

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 12:23 am
by ashkpa
ND42 i13: Land Attacks
Three land attacks, all at high odds. I assumed you would choose assault on the two where you had the choice.

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 12:24 am
by ashkpa
turn ended with a roll of 1.
The Allies get to place a partisan in China.

RE: Pat vs Ronnie GW AAR
Posted: Tue Aug 01, 2017 12:44 am
by ashkpa
Here is the partisan screen.
