Page 130 of 325
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 10:35 am
by Lowpe
Another wave:
Afternoon Air attack on Colombo , at 29,48
Weather in hex: Overcast
Raid spotted at 32 NM, estimated altitude 11,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 8 minutes
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 20
Allied aircraft
B-17D Fortress x 7
B-26 Marauder x 12
No Japanese losses
Allied aircraft losses
B-17D Fortress: 1 destroyed, 3 damaged
B-26 Marauder: 2 destroyed, 2 damaged
Japanese Ships
xAK Amagi Maru, Bomb hits 1, and is sunk
Repair Shipyard hits 2
Port hits 1
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 10:37 am
by Lowpe
I think we probably traded 1-1 on all the sweeps, don't have the finished turn as Japan needs to sleep on it.[;)]
A little disappointed as recon spotted a CVL in port yesterday.[:)]
I think quite a few squadrons of beasts didn't fly...need to check into their commanders. I don't think I have touched them that much, and unfortunately, the HQa they are assigned to aren't present.
This was one of later attacks during the morning, surprising to me a bit, but no doubt the IJ were tired and outnumbered:
Morning Air attack on Colombo , at 29,48
Weather in hex: Moderate rain
Raid spotted at 25 NM, estimated altitude 34,100 feet.
Estimated time to target is 7 minutes
Japanese aircraft
A6M2 Zero x 15
Ki-43-Ic Oscar x 2
Allied aircraft
P-39D Airacobra x 23
Japanese aircraft losses
A6M2 Zero: 3 destroyed
Ki-43-Ic Oscar: 1 destroyed
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 11:33 am
by Lowpe
Japan ran some destroyers (at least) into Bundaberg during the night, and are patrolling PT boats actually ran away. That is ok...so they might have been fast transporting or more likely looking to intercept a bombardment.
Night Air attack on TF, near Bundaberg at 96,154
Weather in hex: Light rain
Raid spotted at 19 NM, estimated altitude 20,000 feet.
Estimated time to target is 9 minutes
Allied aircraft
TBD-1 Devastator x 3
No Allied losses
Japanese Ships
DD Karukaya
Aircraft Attacking:
3 x TBD-1 Devastator launching torpedoes at 200 feet
Naval Attack: 1 x 22.4in Mk 13 Torp.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 11:38 am
by Lowpe
An interesting battle message, this over Colombo...bleeding CAP perhaps?:
Damaged Hurricane IIb Trop from No.135 Sqn RAF shot down on way home
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 11:40 am
by Encircled
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
An interesting battle message, this over Colombo...bleeding CAP perhaps?:
Damaged Hurricane IIb Trop from No.135 Sqn RAF shot down on way home
Get that one a lot
Normally for bombers for me!
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 1:37 pm
by RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Encircled
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
An interesting battle message, this over Colombo...bleeding CAP perhaps?:
Damaged Hurricane IIb Trop from No.135 Sqn RAF shot down on way home
Get that one a lot
Normally for bombers for me!
Or LRCAP over your base. Even 10% increases the OPs losses for the opponent - something for you to consider doing if you are not currently doing so. They don't even have to be your best fighters and they can be low as well.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 2:14 pm
by castor troy
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
An interesting battle message, this over Colombo...bleeding CAP perhaps?:
Damaged Hurricane IIb Trop from No.135 Sqn RAF shot down on way home
Just a message that tells you a damaged aircraft crashed after the battle. Doesn't come from fighters pursuing your aircraft or LRCAP or anything else. Just a damaged aircraft that crashed. The message is just there for the "feeling".
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 10:21 pm
by Lowpe
Air losses...not bad...not bad at all.
Darn KB keeps shooting down Cats...

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2021 12:28 am
by witpqs
Sweet!
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2021 1:01 am
by BBfanboy
His overall air losses continue to be 41% above yours. I don't see how that bodes well for the Japanese side this early in the war, when Japan is supposed to have the advantage in pilot experience and more agile aircraft. It only gets worse once you get more B-17s, P-38s, Spitfire Vs and P-40Ks - the leading edge of the Allied response.
While I understand the need for the Japanese player to be aggressive in the first 6-9 months, I always thought it needed to be tempered a bit with asset loss avoidance.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2021 1:04 am
by RangerJoe
Where is the "Zero Bonus"?[&:]
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2021 10:19 am
by Lowpe
Knocking on Bundaberg again...this time sweep the harbor with PT boats, then the Helena SAG, then three good sized bombardment task forces, followed by aerial bombing, shock attack with the LeeGrants, and general attack by most of the other troops, with the fractional divisional units still with militia (and about 50% or worse disabled) just bombarding.
Hopefully this cracks Bundaberg...there are a dozen aux planes there (damaged?).
On the southern tip of India, Tanjore is now a size 8 monster airfield, but I am simply pursuing some night bombing and daytime cap trap up at Mangalore.
Baker Island area the subs are accumulating their patrol areas...prep is set, a division is unloading at the Line islands, Gardner Island is being occupied by rangers, aviation to follow, paratroops are loading on a SST for another islands deeper in Japanese lines.
Noticed that the original Dutch bombers can upgrade to B25s, which I have a bunch, so will make another good ground bombing squadron or two in India with them. Very useful.
Moving on Comilla and Dacca.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2021 10:23 am
by castor troy
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
His overall air losses continue to be 41% above yours. I don't see how that bodes well for the Japanese side this early in the war, when Japan is supposed to have the advantage in pilot experience and more agile aircraft. It only gets worse once you get more B-17s, P-38s, Spitfire Vs and P-40Ks - the leading edge of the Allied response.
While I understand the need for the Japanese player to be aggressive in the first 6-9 months, I always thought it needed to be tempered a bit with asset loss avoidance.
One sure needs to be aggressive as the Japanese but his overal playstyle is pretty much mirrored by his constant shock attacks on the ground and going for all the map at once, well...
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2021 10:49 am
by Lowpe
ORIGINAL: BBfanboy
His overall air losses continue to be 41% above yours. I don't see how that bodes well for the Japanese side this early in the war, when Japan is supposed to have the advantage in pilot experience and more agile aircraft. It only gets worse once you get more B-17s, P-38s, Spitfire Vs and P-40Ks - the leading edge of the Allied response.
While I understand the need for the Japanese player to be aggressive in the first 6-9 months, I always thought it needed to be tempered a bit with asset loss avoidance.
Overall the game feels very strange to me. This is a scenario 2 monster, and Japan should really still have the initiative, but it certainly feels I have it and Japan is reacting to my moves.
I think Japans initial goal was AV, he said as much, and he gamed it out to send just enough force to each area...but the Allies fought back almost everywhere delaying his timetable and inflicting solid damage and preventing I estimate about 4000VP in Australia, perhaps more with his losses there.
The Allies are so horrendously strong, especially if you don't simply throw away your forces early, especially your air force. Hitting the Catalina force at Pearl seems very powerful to Japan, and would make every counter move by the Allies harder thru early 42.
I still have yet to see Tojo IIa, but then the Japanese have yet to see P38s so I don't think PDU off is a factor. Rather it is the piecemeal IJ attacks across almost the entire map. The loss and damaging of his heavy cruiser fleet certainly hurts, they are so powerful for Japan...
Plans for Baker continue to improve...the ultimate goal is Tabiteuea and will have forces prepped for it to to leap frog an initial success, a lot of the Gilberts are very attractive.

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2021 12:32 pm
by witpqs
Strongly agree about the search planes at PH. Having that naval search in '42 in the Pacific is IMO the greatest benefit to the Allies of no PH strike openings.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2021 1:06 pm
by DesertWolf101
Early on in your opponent's AAR I told him that I thought his advance was too fragmented and not mutually supporting. From his answer I think you are right that he chose this approach largely due to his focus on the score. That however is a massive risk as it underestimates the very strong capabilities that the Allies can bring to bear even in the very early stages of the war. It sounds a bit paradoxical, but IMO the best way to achieve AV as the Japanese is to not chase it.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2021 2:13 pm
by Alfred
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
..Noticed that the original Dutch bombers can upgrade to B25s, which I have a bunch, so will make another good ground bombing squadron or two in India with them. Very useful...
It isn't the American version. You get only a single month of production, which has already ended. Plus it being PDU Off, you need to check that there isn't a RAAF or USA unit which is scheduled to use them.
Alfred
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2021 2:30 pm
by Alfred
ORIGINAL: DesertWolf101
Early on in your opponent's AAR I told him that I thought his advance was too fragmented and not mutually supporting. From his answer I think you are right that he chose this approach largely due to his focus on the score. That however is a massive risk as it underestimates the very strong capabilities that the Allies can bring to bear even in the very early stages of the war. It sounds a bit paradoxical, but IMO the best way to achieve AV as the Japanese is to not chase it.
It isn't going for AV that is his problem. It is not having a good strategy for garnering the necessary VPs.
There is a very strong corelation factor between real world military strategic objectives and AE's VP structure. A sound military strategy will garner VPs. Almost all Japanese players who pursue an auto victory get tunnel vision into believing that they must get an auto victory in January 1943 and as a consequence discard sound military strategy and tactics in order to grab all the low hanging VPs.
A Japanese AV in 1943 is only possible against a very weak Allied player. AV for Japan OTOH in 1944 is feasible, and has been achieved numerous times, when sound real world military strategy and tactics were adopted from the beginning.
In this match, the VPs currently held by Japan have a foundation built of sand. Ihe last quarter of 1942 ll witness a dramatic turn around in the VP ratios. This match will not last much after mid-1943 although Lowpe won't be in position to get an Allied AV before 1944.
Alfred
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2021 3:39 pm
by RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Alfred
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
..Noticed that the original Dutch bombers can upgrade to B25s, which I have a bunch, so will make another good ground bombing squadron or two in India with them. Very useful...
It isn't the American version. You get only a single month of production, which has already ended. Plus it being PDU Off, you need to check that there isn't a RAAF or USA unit which is scheduled to use them.
Alfred
If I recall correctly, there is one American unit that can use the Dutch B-25s
or the American aircraft. There is ONE RAAF B-25 unit that uses the Dutch B-25s along with Dutch pilots. It comes in as a reinforcement.
The Dutch also get a version of the A-20 called the DB-7 but I am not sure which air units can convert to it in a PDU OFF game.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2021 5:50 pm
by BBfanboy
ORIGINAL: RangerJoe
ORIGINAL: Alfred
ORIGINAL: Lowpe
..Noticed that the original Dutch bombers can upgrade to B25s, which I have a bunch, so will make another good ground bombing squadron or two in India with them. Very useful...
It isn't the American version. You get only a single month of production, which has already ended. Plus it being PDU Off, you need to check that there isn't a RAAF or USA unit which is scheduled to use them.
Alfred
If I recall correctly, there is one American unit that can use the Dutch B-25s
or the American aircraft. There is ONE RAAF B-25 unit that uses the Dutch B-25s along with Dutch pilots. It comes in as a reinforcement.
The Dutch also get a version of the A-20 called the DB-7 but I am not sure which air units can convert to it in a PDU OFF game.
I have one Dutch B-25 sqn which is assigned to the RAAF - so its icon shows up Aussie Green. Stock Scenario 1.