Page 15 of 25
RE: Spring Thaw
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 1:34 pm
by TulliusDetritus
ORIGINAL: Q-Ball
It seems like I have some extra Air Command HQs; every front has one, and I am keeping the Long Range Command, but do I need any more of these seemingly extra Air Command HQs? Let me know, because if I don't, I will disband a couple for Infantry Replacements.
How did you do that? If you don't count the Long Range thing and the two Naval [?] Air Commands in the Baltic and Black Seas you should have only one Air HQ for each Front [&:] I didn't disband anything and that's what I have on my game.
During the summer the Voronezh Front will arrive and like two weeks later a new Air Command (the 15th) which I assigned to this new front.
On my game the two Naval air commands are attached to Fronts located near the Baltic and Black Seas (Leningrad and Suuthern Fronts that is). So in fact these two fronts have 2 air commands (regular + naval).
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 2:44 pm
by Erik Rutins
ORIGINAL: Apollo11
I don't know Erik... I think the Soviets might have overdone themselves here...
I would have stopped a couple of weeks earlier, but I understand the temptation. The counter-offensive was very well executed overall. The Germans can hit back in March harder than you expect. Even when wounded they are dangerous.
Regards,
- Erik
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 3:06 pm
by Mehring
I agree with Flavius. What I was advocating earlier doesn't look appropriate in the light of the information you've given. Fortify and man the entries to the Crimea. Look over your shoulder big time, for river lines to defend. The Axis have good numbers of manpower and guns, the tanks will come, and any degradation of his morale and experience you've achieved, you must do your best to maintain. Get the units you need for a defence on rail lines in refit mode and don't refit the diggers. Time to sober up after a good winter, I fear he'll recover quicker than you.
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 3:09 pm
by paullus99
Agreed - hitting him for the sake of inflicting losses at this point may well prove to be counter-productive (for the moral reasons listed above). His infantry will recover faster & hit harder, so start preparing your fallback positions & be prepared to trade some space for time to prepare your defenses.
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 3:23 pm
by TulliusDetritus
Hmm, you all make it sound as if there's going to be a massive German attack that will doom the Soviets [&:] Maybe I am way too agressive but I would not miss any opportunity. I would keep trashing ALL the Germans in sight: snow, clear or mud weather, who cares...
Tarhunnas has only these snow turns. And I doubt he can do anything. He's been utterly smashed. AFTER that Q-Ball has the best shield avaliable: MUD until june [;)] He has PLENTY of time to reorganize and rest his forces.
And he can have both: keep trashing enemies while some units (er brigades) start digging defensive positions. That's what I would do. Er, that's what I DID on my game.
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 3:36 pm
by Encircled
But you were much stronger than Q-Ball is now.
If he has indeed maxed out his Guards, then he's just got to slow down the Germans, and prepared defences are the best way to do this.
The problem that I see is that Tarhunnas can just pull his Panzers and Motorised Divs back for refit, and unless you get lucky on recon, they could in theory hit anywhere on the front, and you can't be strong everywhere
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 3:49 pm
by TulliusDetritus
ORIGINAL: Encircled
But you were much stronger than Q-Ball is now.
If he has indeed maxed out his Guards, then he's just got to slow down the Germans, and prepared defences are the best way to do this.
The problem that I see is that Tarhunnas can just pull his Panzers and Motorised Divs back for refit, and unless you get lucky on recon, they could in theory hit anywhere on the front, and you can't be strong everywhere
Q-Ball preserved the Red Army, so I don't think I was much more stronger. He has clearly said he keeps seeing easy targets. Strong or not (blizzard or not), he might smash them. Soviets have lots of men. Germans don't. These trashed guys might not fight during the summer offensive (if there is one). I wanted Q-Ball to know the two sides of the coin. He must decide [:)]
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 5:41 pm
by Mehring
I think you're overstating the material damage done to the Germans. Damage to German morale coupled with growth in Russian soft factors should considerably degrade the Germans offensive ability, but they have till June to recover too.
I see a lack of Russian guns and manpower which makes me feel a little queezy, and remember, a lot of arms and population centres have gone west.
Not saying it's all over, not by a long shot, but I do think the Axis will be able to crack the Russian line and give the Russians a good summer kicking.
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 5:59 pm
by TulliusDetritus
ORIGINAL: Mehring
I think you're overstating the material damage done to the Germans. Damage to German morale coupled with growth in Russian soft factors should considerably degrade the Germans offensive ability, but they have till June to recover too.
I see a lack of Russian guns and manpower which makes me feel a little queezy, and remember, a lot of arms and population centres have gone west.
Not saying it's all over, not by a long shot, but I do think the Axis will be able to crack the Russian line and give the Russians a good summer kicking.
Mehring, I am NOT thinking about june. I am thinking about these few snow turns. In other games you would see Germans trashing the Red Army. Here we can have the opposite: a mini-Blizzard Part II [;)] The Germans have been really smashed. There should be lots of ants (or really weak enemy units). I speak from my [limited] experience. I saw these miserable ants on my game (I was expecting German agressive moves, which NEVER appeared. The only thing that appeared was the Soviet steamroller...). And I achieved maximum 70 attacks per turn. Ergo I can imagine the really rough state of the Germans on this game.
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 6:09 pm
by Flaviusx
The Germans haven't been smashed. Their numbers are actually rather good, excepting their AFV holdings. Their infantry made it through this winter in rather good shape, it seems.
Also, Tarhunnas is not to be underestimated. He is very dangerous on the offense. Once his mobility is restored, anything can happen, and it's best to plan for the worst. Nor is the Red Army particularly overwhelming. For the sake of comparsion, take a look at the 42 scenario and the starting Soviet numbers -- Q-ball is short of these across the board.
He had a fine blizzard counteroffensive and made full use of his advantages during the season, but the beginning of wisdom consists of knowing when to stop.
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 6:20 pm
by Klydon
Q-Ball had a great blizzard offensive that got him back into the game. This game is still very much up for grabs as a result of that. Tarhunnas may have low tanks, but motorized units and panzers can still surround a lot of units. He will also get a good number of re-enforcements coming in during the spring to build up for the summer offensive.
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 6:24 pm
by TulliusDetritus
ORIGINAL: Flaviusx
The Germans haven't been smashed.
My opponent disagrees [;)] He clearly said the German units that were smashed (aka attacked) were in a rough state... And on this game we have seen +100 attacks per turn... No one is thinking about winning the war. Simply about trashing the ants next to your units. And there should be plenty...
There's plenty of time to stop and rest... On 2 or 3 weeks mud will be here.
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:24 pm
by Encircled
He needs that extra time to recover
He won't smash German offensive capability in the snow for the whole of '42, but if he overextends, with damaged units in need of a rest, it won't take much to take a couple of big hits.
Why risk it?
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:34 pm
by JAMiAM
A lot of this metagaming would be drastically changed if the game was using random weather. Then, the silliness of speaking of just x more turns of this, and y turns of that would disappear. You'd have to make choices that were strategically, and operationally sound, without knowing exactly what type of weather would come up next turn.
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:45 pm
by TulliusDetritus
Encircled, he's got the whole mud season to rest. That's a lot of time. Above all, I don't like this dogmatism. Blizzard over = duck and cover. Why? If there are juicy targets, why should we miss them? I guess Q-Ball was perplexed. End of blizzard, and somehow he can still attack enemy units. That's why he asked. I faced the same dilemma and decided I would throw overboard the dogmatism. I am pretty certain I did the right thing [:)] He wanted our opinions. He has them.
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 8:00 pm
by Encircled
Which is what is wrong. He knows exactly what is going to happen.
A lot of this metagaming would be drastically changed if the game was using random weather. Then, the silliness of speaking of just x more turns of this, and y turns of that would disappear. You'd have to make choices that were strategically, and operationally sound, without knowing exactly what type of weather would come up next turn.
+1
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 8:10 pm
by sillyflower
ORIGINAL: TulliusDetritus
Encircled, he's got the whole mud season to rest. That's a lot of time. Above all, I don't like this dogmatism. Blizzard over = duck and cover. Why? If there are juicy targets, why should we miss them? I guess Q-Ball was perplexed. End of blizzard, and somehow he can still attack enemy units. That's why he asked. I faced the same dilemma and decided I would throw overboard the dogmatism. I am pretty certain I did the right thing [:)] He wanted our opinions. He has them.
I agree with TD. You can still kick some Jerries without over-extending. If you are causing nearly 1:1 losses it hurts Tarhunnas more than you. I think germans only get about 35K replacements per turn so attrition + loses of 30K will mean he's getting weaker- tho' he does get new units. I'm not sure how many arty he can afford to replace each turn, but those are likely to be losses he can ill afford.
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 8:16 pm
by Encircled
He's got about a 1,000,000 men less than pretty much every other Soviet Mar'42 AAR I've seen.
My advice is to begin to reorganise, and wait for the counter attack behind prepared positions
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 8:46 pm
by Flaviusx
ORIGINAL: JAMiAM
A lot of this metagaming would be drastically changed if the game was using random weather. Then, the silliness of speaking of just x more turns of this, and y turns of that would disappear. You'd have to make choices that were strategically, and operationally sound, without knowing exactly what type of weather would come up next turn.
James, my advice in this situation would be exactly the same with random weather. The Red Army needs to rest and rebuild and lay down reserves and defensive lines. 5 million men and 55k artillery isn't going to break the Wehrmacht, and is more likely to be itself broken if caught in the open.
RE: Blizzard!
Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 10:39 pm
by Mehring
Encircled, he's got the whole mud season to rest. That's a lot of time. Above all, I don't like this dogmatism.
I completely agree. You have to judge a situation on the corelation of forces, not merely a change in the weather. If you look back a page or two, you'll see I was advocating very similar to yourself, actually advocating keeping the line stretched if the situation was good and preparing summer offensives... and then I saw the respective OBs. It's really not that great. There's cause for concern.
Attack as Russain and you almost invariably open yourself to painful counter- attack. There's little to gain here, and a whole lot to lose.