Page 15 of 51
RE: CWDB Update
Posted: Sun Mar 23, 2014 1:12 pm
by Coiler12
RE: CWDB Update
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:56 pm
by treez
Nuclear warhead W7, W31 or M-22 for MIM-14 Nike Hercules
RE: CWDB Update
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2014 3:53 pm
by .Sirius
Hi thanks on the to do list
ORIGINAL: treez
Nuclear warhead W7, W31 or M-22 for MIM-14 Nike Hercules
RE: CWDB Update
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 1:50 pm
by VFA41_Lion
Hi guys. I've been looking but can't seem to find it, is the Tsar Bomba (50mt and original, discarded 100mt version) in the CWDB? I was curious to see its effects in CMANO [;)]
RE: CWDB Update
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 2:12 pm
by .Sirius
Hi no problems will build the big mother of all Nukes
ORIGINAL: VFA41_Lion
Hi guys. I've been looking but can't seem to find it, is the Tsar Bomba (50mt and original, discarded 100mt version) in the CWDB? I was curious to see its effects in CMANO [;)]
RE: CWDB Update
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 2:19 pm
by VFA41_Lion
You guys are awesome.
RE: CWDB Update
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 2:26 pm
by .Sirius
Heh rumour has it we even have families and sleep too
ORIGINAL: VFA41_Lion
You guys are awesome.
RE: CWDB Update
Posted: Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:37 pm
by Sardaukar
ORIGINAL: .Sirius
Heh rumour has it we even have families and sleep too
ORIGINAL: VFA41_Lion
You guys are awesome.
We don't believe in those rumours... [:D]
RE: CWDB Update
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 10:12 am
by .Sirius
Hi I've built the 58 Mt version of the bomb, reading about it the fire ball radius was 3km and blast radius 38 km now thats a mega bomb explosion
ORIGINAL: VFA41_Lion
Hi guys. I've been looking but can't seem to find it, is the Tsar Bomba (50mt and original, discarded 100mt version) in the CWDB? I was curious to see its effects in CMANO [;)]
RE: CWDB Update
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2014 10:42 am
by VFA41_Lion
[&o]
ORIGINAL: .Sirius
Hi I've built the 58 Mt version of the bomb, reading about it the fire ball radius was 3km and blast radius 38 km now thats a mega bomb explosion
ORIGINAL: VFA41_Lion
Hi guys. I've been looking but can't seem to find it, is the Tsar Bomba (50mt and original, discarded 100mt version) in the CWDB? I was curious to see its effects in CMANO [;)]
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2014 12:21 pm
by HudsonGame
I see we now have World War II Japanese platforms. Very nice. I would like to see a few Royal Navy assets added. How about HMS Hood. Yes she did sink. What if she had not been sent to the bottom. The Battlecruiser HMS Tiger. Say no London or Washington Naval treaty. She could have easily been around in the late 1940s. Ships that were around post 1946 were HMS Nelson, HMS Rodney, HMS Renown, HMS Queen Elizabeth, and HMS Ramillies. Anyway, it would be nice if some of these ships were added to the Cold War Database.
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests
Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2014 4:36 pm
by rafale
Hi,
is it possible to add D-21?
If yes, we will be able to repeat secret recon missions over Lob-Nor chinese nuclear site
but I have no idea how to make starting point in/from B-52 or SR-71
and about World War II Japanese platforms - is it possible to add Sen Toku class with Aichi M6A1 and bio-bombs "operation Hikari/Splendour"?
thanks for updating CMANO day by day
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 4:57 am
by .Sirius
Hi no problems on the D-21 and I'll look at the rest
ORIGINAL: rafale
Hi,
is it possible to add D-21?
If yes, we will be able to repeat secret recon missions over Lob-Nor chinese nuclear site
but I have no idea how to make starting point in/from B-52 or SR-71
and about World War II Japanese platforms - is it possible to add Sen Toku class with Aichi M6A1 and bio-bombs "operation Hikari/Splendour"?
thanks for updating CMANO day by day
RE: Cold War Database 1946-1979 Platform Requests
Posted: Sun Apr 13, 2014 4:59 am
by .Sirius
Hi HMS Warspite, Queen Elizabeth and Valiant added as they were in service or reserve until 1948 will look at the rest on a case by case basis
ORIGINAL: HudsonGame
I see we now have World War II Japanese platforms. Very nice. I would like to see a few Royal Navy assets added. How about HMS Hood. Yes she did sink. What if she had not been sent to the bottom. The Battlecruiser HMS Tiger. Say no London or Washington Naval treaty. She could have easily been around in the late 1940s. Ships that were around post 1946 were HMS Nelson, HMS Rodney, HMS Renown, HMS Queen Elizabeth, and HMS Ramillies. Anyway, it would be nice if some of these ships were added to the Cold War Database.
RE: CWDB Update
Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2014 7:37 am
by .Sirius
Muhahahaha just dropped a Tsar Bomba in a test blast radius in Command was 28nm !! yeah
ORIGINAL: VFA41_Lion
[&o]
ORIGINAL: .Sirius
Hi I've built the 58 Mt version of the bomb, reading about it the fire ball radius was 3km and blast radius 38 km now thats a mega bomb explosion
ORIGINAL: VFA41_Lion
Hi guys. I've been looking but can't seem to find it, is the Tsar Bomba (50mt and original, discarded 100mt version) in the CWDB? I was curious to see its effects in CMANO [;)]
YB-49
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:21 am
by .Sirius
Hi guys anyone fancy a Stealthy YB-49 and its off shoot YB-35 in the DB in that 1950's mood at the moment
RE: YB-49
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2014 10:22 am
by Coiler12
ORIGINAL: .Sirius
Hi guys anyone fancy a Stealthy YB-49 and its off shoot YB-35 in the DB in that 1950's mood at the moment
I'm always up for some what-if hardware. [:)]
RE: YB-49
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2014 1:07 am
by Hairog
Wow this is amazing. Glad I dropped the $80. How about some more from 1946 including some "what if" weapons...
1. primitive SAM to stand in for the Wasserfal
2. primitive AA missile to stand in for the X4
3. MiG 9 Fargo
4. Yak 15 Feather
5. Tu2s Bat
6. Pe 8 that is a platform for the X4
7. RAF Meteor
8. Seehund mini sub
RE: YB-49
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2014 2:06 am
by NickD
ORIGINAL: Hairog
7. RAF Meteor
Is that different to the 1947-era Meteor Mk 4 which is currently in the CWDB? There's also a 1949-1951 MiG-9 and 1947-era Yak-15. [:)]
RE: YB-49
Posted: Fri Apr 25, 2014 1:51 pm
by Coiler12
The "Generic Depth Charges" on Soviet vessels have far too great a range compared to the named ones on Western vessels.