Page 149 of 325
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2021 12:14 pm
by Lowpe
Now, given the Canton news buildup, I am tempted to land on the friendly islands in the southern Gilberts and take the dot bases around Baker and Canton, supported with akes I should be able to mount a pretty strong shore bombardment softening process while we have a fairly strong forward base for naval search...given that Arorae can already do that.
Ellice Islands can be occupied by troops from Tahiti area...
Definitely don't want to travel outside of our naval search umbrella...
I wonder if this will trigger a cv clash...I have six to put up against the KB. Then again, this is small potatoes for the grab on Marcus...so we will attempt to do this on the cheap...

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2021 12:51 pm
by Lowpe
June 24, 1942
Another day, another attack on the Ankang road. We hold...while the Stuarts race to retreat out before we are forced to.
Ground combat at 81,42 (near Ankang)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 27908 troops, 269 guns, 593 vehicles, Assault Value = 738
Defending force 25525 troops, 97 guns, 29 vehicles, Assault Value = 594
Japanese adjusted assault: 290
Allied adjusted defense: 190
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
669 casualties reported
Squads: 2 destroyed, 71 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Allied ground losses:
777 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 123 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 7 disabled

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2021 12:59 pm
by Lowpe
Big convoy at Baker...our subs miss.

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2021 1:35 pm
by Encircled
That potentially going to change your plans?
A big convoy at Baker does rather suggest reinforcements
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 11:57 am
by Lowpe
Will just change the tactics involved....[:)]
I like drawing forces to the extreme edge of IJ perimeter.[:)]
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 11:41 pm
by Lowpe
June 25th, 1942
Our CLAA SAG does some damage...
Night Naval bombardment of Canton Island at 153,143
Japanese aircraft
no flights
Japanese aircraft losses
H6K4 Mavis: 1 damaged
G4M1 Betty: 1 damaged
Allied Ships
CLAA San Juan
CLAA San Diego
CLAA Atlanta
Japanese ground losses:
25 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 5 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 0 disabled
Airbase supply hits 1
Runway hits 8
Port hits 3
Port fuel hits 1
Port supply hits 2
CLAA San Juan firing at Canton Island
CLAA San Diego firing at Canton Island
CLAA Atlanta firing at Canton Island
While our DD SAG decides to hold off on rushing Baker...sub intel swayed them
Sub attack near Baker Island at 149,136
Japanese Ships
CL Tenryu
DD Kisaragi
DD Tawakaze
Allied Ships
SS S-27, hits 6
SS S-27 launches 4 torpedoes at CL Tenryu
S-27 bottoming out ....
DD Tawakaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Tawakaze attacking submerged sub ....
DD Tawakaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Tawakaze fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Tawakaze attacking submerged sub ....
Escort abandons search for sub

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 11:43 pm
by Lowpe
Obligatory attack on Ankang road...
Ground combat at 81,42 (near Ankang)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 27415 troops, 269 guns, 592 vehicles, Assault Value = 683
Defending force 24466 troops, 91 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 498
Japanese adjusted assault: 218
Allied adjusted defense: 151
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 1
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), supply(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
273 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 44 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 13 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Vehicles lost 38 (2 destroyed, 36 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
432 casualties reported
Squads: 7 destroyed, 90 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 8 disabled

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 11:46 pm
by Lowpe
Probing towards Lanchow...

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Wed Sep 01, 2021 11:47 pm
by Lowpe
Attack at Bataan...
Ground combat at Bataan (78,77)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 24864 troops, 450 guns, 795 vehicles, Assault Value = 744
Defending force 32719 troops, 427 guns, 287 vehicles, Assault Value = 766
Japanese adjusted assault: 557
Allied adjusted defense: 1013
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2 (fort level 2)
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), preparation(-), experience(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
719 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 90 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 11 disabled
Engineers: 2 destroyed, 3 disabled
Vehicles lost 44 (3 destroyed, 41 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
714 casualties reported
Squads: 25 destroyed, 24 disabled
Non Combat: 2 destroyed, 25 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 14 disabled
Guns lost 7 (3 destroyed, 4 disabled)
Vehicles lost 4 (1 destroyed, 3 disabled)
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 10:35 am
by Lowpe
Another bout of major flooding here...river crests in 5 hours....
View from an apartment complex near me...along the Schuylkill River.
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 12:23 pm
by witpqs
I hope you are on higher ground?
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 2:51 pm
by Gnack
Yikes, stay safe Lowpe. Long time lurker here... enjoying this AAR
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 4:41 pm
by Encircled
Got flooded out of our house in 2016 during Storm Desmond
Hope you are okay Lowpe
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 5:54 pm
by RangerJoe
Where I live, we are not friendly with our storms and name them . . .
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Thu Sep 02, 2021 6:04 pm
by Encircled
Where I live, the storms are named after each letter in the alphabet, and Storm Desmond was the fourth of the year
Either way, its bloody horrible getting flooded out. Took us seven months till we were back in as well
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 9:29 am
by Lowpe
Haven't sunk yet...river crested and only minor flooding in one room.[:)]
RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 9:31 am
by Lowpe
June 26th, 1942
Obligatory attack on Ankang road:
Ground combat at 81,42 (near Ankang)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 27098 troops, 269 guns, 589 vehicles, Assault Value = 646
Defending force 23627 troops, 86 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 416
Japanese adjusted assault: 195
Allied adjusted defense: 226
Japanese assault odds: 1 to 2
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), leaders(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
239 casualties reported
Squads: 1 destroyed, 22 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 10 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 1 disabled
Vehicles lost 25 (1 destroyed, 24 disabled)
Allied ground losses:
1125 casualties reported
Squads: 4 destroyed, 103 disabled
Non Combat: 1 destroyed, 6 disabled
Engineers: 0 destroyed, 7 disabled
Guns lost 9 (1 destroyed, 8 disabled)

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 9:32 am
by Lowpe
Chinese caught out of position, no supplies, and they break like glass to the first attack.
Ground combat at 81,43 (near Ankang)
Japanese Deliberate attack
Attacking force 26794 troops, 208 guns, 28 vehicles, Assault Value = 851
Defending force 13944 troops, 42 guns, 0 vehicles, Assault Value = 541
Japanese adjusted assault: 776
Allied adjusted defense: 154
Japanese assault odds: 5 to 1
Combat modifiers
Defender: terrain(+), experience(-), supply(-)
Attacker:
Japanese ground losses:
418 casualties reported
Squads: 0 destroyed, 57 disabled
Non Combat: 0 destroyed, 4 disabled
Engineers: 1 destroyed, 4 disabled
Allied ground losses:
3779 casualties reported
Squads: 109 destroyed, 109 disabled
Non Combat: 67 destroyed, 23 disabled
Engineers: 5 destroyed, 5 disabled
Units retreated 2
Defeated Allied Units Retreating!
Assaulting units:
13th Division
39th Division
Defending units:
8th Route Army
85th Chinese Corps

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 9:36 am
by Lowpe
Spot the convoy retreating from Baker in the night...
Sub attack near Howland Island at 147,133
Japanese Ships
xAK Anzan Maru #2
xAK Azuchisan Maru
xAK Koyu Maru
xAK Tokati Maru
xAK Alaska Maru
DD Tsuta
Allied Ships
SS S-34
SS S-34 launches 2 torpedoes at xAK Anzan Maru #2
S-34 diving deep ....
DD Tsuta fails to find sub, continues to search...
DD Tsuta attacking submerged sub ....
DD Tsuta is out of ASW ammo

RE: Spanking Lowpe (NJP72 vs Lowpe (A))
Posted: Sat Sep 04, 2021 9:44 am
by Lowpe
Not sure how much I can accomplish by taking Katha, but it is pressure on the IJ perimeter.
