Page 16 of 25
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 6:40 am
by warspite1
1st July 1941
Then the other stuff
Somewhere in there during the AI turn that I was trying to keep up with as the turn was progressing:
- the British and Canadians received some Destroyers for Bases units
- Some aircraft were delivered I think to the UK
- Egypt exploded with units - those 150 tanks I spoke about arrived - as did the Kiwis and Aussies (albeit not full strength)
- There was some diplomatic success in Spain
There may have been other stuff too that I can't recall. That was a busy turn!
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 6:59 am
by warspite1
1st July 1941
Time to take stock I think. I will need to take my time over this next turn.
The Italian Fleet have turned up en masse off the Greek coast - just as the RN divided its forces.
The British in Egypt need looking at- I've no idea what it there.
The Soviet front is a mystery.
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 7:30 am
by warspite1
1st July 1941
Reports
I don't want to spend too much time on the reports. I do not like the way they try and present information and in some cases do not even know what I am looking at. I searched 'reports' in the manual but came up with nothing that helps.
So looking at the report below, what does this tell me? I have three columns - land, air and naval - and assume that these are my current total forces? But what do the bars on the left mean? Why not have a legend to explain?
There is also a losses page that sets information out in a similar way. Again, no legend. So France has lost just over 20 land. What is that 20? Presumably total units of all types.

RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 7:43 am
by warspite1
1st July 1941
Reports (cont)
There is also a detailed losses screen which I find more interesting as I can see exactly what I have lost. That said I am not sure its right.
According to this the UK have lost 3 HQ. They lost Gort in France and O'Connor in Egypt - what was the third one?
They have lost 3 armies. They lost the BEF in France and the Western Desert Force in Egypt - what was the third one?
They have lost 10 Corps. They lost three in France, one in Egypt - where have the other six come from?

RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 7:51 am
by n0kn0k
ORIGINAL: warspite1
1st July 1941
Reports (cont)
There is also a detailed losses screen which I find more interesting as I can see exactly what I have lost. That said I am not sure its right.
According to this the UK have lost 3 HQ. They lost Gort in France and O'Connor in Egypt - what was the third one?
They have lost 3 armies. They lost the BEF in France and the Western Desert Force in Egypt - what was the third one?
They have lost 10 Corps. They lost three in France, one in Egypt - where have the other six come from?
They count the minors like Greece and Netherlands, Belgium etc. Each is assigned to a major party.
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 7:56 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: n0kn0k
ORIGINAL: warspite1
1st July 1941
Reports (cont)
There is also a detailed losses screen which I find more interesting as I can see exactly what I have lost. That said I am not sure its right.
According to this the UK have lost 3 HQ. They lost Gort in France and O'Connor in Egypt - what was the third one?
They have lost 3 armies. They lost the BEF in France and the Western Desert Force in Egypt - what was the third one?
They have lost 10 Corps. They lost three in France, one in Egypt - where have the other six come from?
They count the minors like Greece and Netherlands, Belgium etc. Each is assigned to a major party.
warspite1
Does it explain that and I've just missed it? Either way, I think there should be a separate column for these.
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 8:00 am
by warspite1
1st July 1941
Graphs
Of far more interest are the Graphs of which there are 7 - such as the one below

RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 8:03 am
by warspite1
1st July 1941
Graphs (Cont)
The only one I am unsure of is this one - what is this telling me?

RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 10:07 am
by Orm
Er is the Pope a Catholic....
No. He is Italian.
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 10:50 am
by operating
ORIGINAL: Orm
Er is the Pope a Catholic....
No. He is Italian.
Actually he is from Argentina (Pope Francis)....
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 11:01 am
by Orm
ORIGINAL: operating
ORIGINAL: Orm
Er is the Pope a Catholic....
No. He is Italian.
Actually he is from Argentina (Pope Francis)....
Oh no! Do we have a antipope again? [;)]
Pius XII is the current Pope and he was born in Rome. He has reigned since 2 March 1939.
A Argentinian pope... well... I never... *stomps away muttering*
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 11:20 am
by operating
Warspite
In SCWWI the production screen held a number of units preselected by the devs usually dated with deployment location for release by each country. Might it be the same in SC3? You seem surprised by a number of unit dumps.
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 1:38 pm
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: operating
Warspite
In SCWWI the production screen held a number of units preselected by the devs usually dated with deployment location for release by each country. Might it be the same in SC3? You seem surprised by a number of unit dumps.
warspite1
I can only assume you are referring to my comment re the British in Egypt. If so these are not on the production screen (at least I don't think so). They were added as a result of decisions - not purchases - which is why they may not have been on the production screen.
RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 2:07 pm
by warspite1
1st July 1941
Research
Probably an area of the game where jumping straight in didn't pay dividends.
At one stage I was at my maximum 2000 MPP with the British but that has tailed off dramatically as the need for units, reinforcement and upgrade has become more acute. I have not followed a consistent plan with any country - the USSR mainly because they had no MPP!

RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 2:10 pm
by warspite1
1st July 1941
Research (Cont)
I like this table - it is simple but very functional - and I can see at-a-glance what is what. Like the fact I desperately need Infantry weapons for the Soviets! I was surprised I hadn't got ASW with the British although a look at the first table shows they are almost there.

RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 2:18 pm
by warspite1
1st July 1941
Diplomacy
The only country I have been spending any money on is Spain - as the Allies spent a lot on keeping Spain sweet in WWII.
The ones I am most interested - but at the same time very wary of - are the Vichy countries. Firstly I don't understand how individual Vichy countries can have a separate % and secondly I am really curious to know what it takes for Vichy (and Spain for that matter) to align with Germany and what the effects are if they do.

RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 2:25 pm
by warspite1
1st July 1941
War Maps
The convoy map - which caused the game to crash previously - now appears to be working again. This is really useful for seeing where one's units are - I didn't realise a Soviet convoy route had opened!

RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 2:28 pm
by warspite1
1st July 1941
War Maps (cont)
The Strategy Map is quite useful too, functioning as a mini-map to aid getting to units quickly.

RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 2:35 pm
by warspite1
1st July 1941
United Kingdom
The situation in the Near East. The XIII Indian Corps, having landed in Basra, are heading towards Baghdad in the valley between the Tigris and the Euphrates to put down the revolt. No idea what to expect there. I send a weak fighter unit there to try and get some reconnaissance.

RE: How the Axis could have won. Allied AAR RTW
Posted: Sun Nov 27, 2016 2:44 pm
by warspite1
1st July 1941
United Kingdom
The situation in North Africa. Following the flurry of reinforcement activity last turn General Auchinleck, who replaced Wavell last month) now has under his command:
Commander in Chief Middle East - General Sir Claude Auchinleck
8th Army
V Inf Corps
1st (Canadian) Inf Corps
7th Armoured Division
10th Armoured Division
Attached units
Anti-Aircraft
Reserve Formations (mostly weak and/or forming)
New Zealand Corps
Australian Corps
Attached units
Anti-Tank
Field Artillery
Reconnaissance
Cairo Garrison
Jeruselem Garrison
Desert Air Force
1 x Fighter wing
2 x Tactical bomber wing
