Page 16 of 23
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:11 pm
by AllenK
On second thoughts, Palembang is fine.
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:13 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
USSR marker offence.
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:13 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
ORIGINAL: AllenK
On second thoughts, Palembang is fine.
See edited post. No partisan [8D]
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:15 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
US entry marker to Japan pool
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 5:17 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
US chooses to send resources to China. One marker to tension pool.
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2018 6:04 pm
by AllenK
Germany End of turn
Germany sends two saved oils in Poland to production. Brings the BP's to 15.
U-boat returns to Kiel.
Germany reorganises all (0.3 oil).
No break downs
Production 15
ARM
FTR-2
INF
MIL
Sub 4838 2nd
Repair Adm Scheer
Reinforcements
Germany assigns pilots to Ju-88, Stuka (both Saarbrucken) and HUN FTR .
MILs
PARA to Essen
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2018 7:12 am
by warspite1
Mar/Apr 1940
Italy and Japan End of Turn
Italy (4) 1 saved oil in Milan
Stay at Sea and RTB: Nothing
Production
SUB (1st cycle) (1)
NAV (3)
Reinforcement
La Spezia: Vittorio Veneto
Japan (13) 1 saved oil in Canton. Please place the Bushehr and Bandar Shapur oils to idle. I checked to ensure the 1 saved oil turned Soviet after the Victory step and it did, so that works.
Stay at Sea: Nothing
RTB: Three TRS/AMPH to Fukuoka
Oil Reorganisation: 3 ships re-organised for no oil expenditure
Production
INF (3)
GARR (2)
CARR (1st Cycle) (2)
TERR (2)
AMPH (1st Cycle) (3)
SUB (1st Cycle) (1)
Reinforcement
Fukuoka: INF
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 5:41 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
I post instructions from Orm here:
Prod Plan Prelim
France:
Save oil from Iraq in Damascus.
clear the idle on the CW oil in Port of Spain.
Suggest that CW change their convoy lines so that the Senegal oil can be transported to France.
The oil lent from CW go to production.
These changes expect to give France 10 BPs and 1 additional oil saved.
USSR:
USSR changes their oil resource from saved to production.
16 BPs expected.
Stay At Sea:
France:
All available ships stay at sea.(Including the BBs in the North Sea)
Return To Base:
France:
The 3 cruisers in CSV return to Mogador in Morocco
Use Oil:
USSR:
Reorganize the two LND3 in Persia for 0.4 oil. (Rounded to no oil at all)
France:
Reorganize the three cruisers and the TRS for no oil.
Break Down:
USSR breaks down the 11th INF in Leningrad to two divisions.
Production:
France (10):
INF
GARR
AT
FTR2
USSR (16):
2 x INF
CAV
ARM
Pilot
Reinforcements:
France:
CP -> Libreville, Gabon
ARM -> Paris
MECH -> Paris
USSR:
FTR2 (I-153) -> Leningrad
INF -> Murmansk
Resource Lending:
France trade the Hanoi resource to China
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 6:22 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Nothing...
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Sat Jan 20, 2018 7:17 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Japanese reinforcements:
Where do you want to place Manchurian TERR?
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2018 12:27 am
by warspite1
ORIGINAL: Mayhemizer
Japanese reinforcements:
Where do you want to place Manchurian TERR?
warspite1
A Manchurian? Could you place him in Tsitsihar please?
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2018 4:03 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
I managed to fix CW convoy lines pretty easily producing 13 BPs.
Most CW ships stays at sea. The Queens go to Australia.
US returns one CP and sub to Philipines.
Oil use
CW reorg all for 1,75 oil. (Note that workaround in port attack did not save any oil from CW)
US reorg all for 0,45 oil.
Production
CW 13
INF
FTR3
Pilot
CP
CVP-1
AMPH (1st)
US 11
3x BB (1st)
AMPH (1st)
GAR
China 5
MTN
CAV div
Persia was conquered by USSR.
Reinforcements
China
GAR to Chihkiang
CW
Pilot to Hurricane
Hurricane to Cardiff
INF to London
CP to Calcutta
US
CV to Dan Diego
CP To Philippines
Resource lending
CW one resource to China
US one resource to China
US one oil resource to CW
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2018 4:12 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Allies won initiative (rolls 1-7). Allies decided that Axis can go first.
Weather roll... FINE EVERYWHERE!

RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2018 4:15 pm
by Orm
Fine weather wasn't all that unexpected considering the die modifier.
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2018 6:21 pm
by AllenK
In a completely shocking and totally unexpected move, the Germans declare war on Belgium.
Do the Allies want to set up Belgium, do the necessary US Entry and send back the file? No other DoW or alignments.
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 1:45 am
by Mayhemizer_slith
Shocking news! [X(]
I van do it tonight. If you want play earlier, here is the set up.
CAV to Liege
2x INF to Antwerp
TERR, FTR and 2x CP to Boma, Belgian Congo.
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 5:01 pm
by Orm
The Belgian situation.

Picture from Mar/Apr '40 Impulse #1 (Axis) - DOW
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Tue Jan 23, 2018 5:10 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
Due to unfair attack, US gets one chit.
RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 2:50 pm
by AllenK
M/A 40 Axis 1
No alignments.
Germany and Japan land. Italy combined. To liven up the proceedings, the Little Bavarian Corporal drops an O-chit on von Rundstedt and tells him to "get on with it".
Nothing much happens until the Germans send a Stuka to Antwerp and two to Metz for ground strikes. Do either of the French fighters wish to contest the skies? Germany has 2 Bf-109's on standby.

RE: UK vs Nordic 1
Posted: Wed Jan 24, 2018 2:55 pm
by Mayhemizer_slith
It’s surprise impulse, I think Allies are just surprised [:)]