Page 16 of 36
RE: RE:T29
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2019 8:55 am
by Kantti
I prefer using motorcycle regiments for cavalry corpses. They now add most CV per SU and as an upside there is plenty of already experienced regiments right off from the start. Then I mix those with some arty-mg battalions and tank battalions (have to be built early to get any experience).
RE: RE:T29
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2019 10:34 am
by xhoel
Thanks for the encouraging words guys!
@bigbaba1111: I recall that the word on the forums is for the Soviets to not build Sapper Regiments as they downgrade to Sapper Battalions. The Sapper Battalions have been changed to operate more like construction formations than Assault Pioneers (like they historically did) until October 1942 when they switch their TOEs and operate properly as engineers. I might be wrong but this is what I have gathered from reading forum posts and checking TOE changes.
PS: The Cavalry Corps are indeed looking scary but have not yet facilitated a breakthrough there.
@Kantti: The Motorcycle Regiments sure give a tremendous boost to the CV but have other downsides that the players should consider. You can only build a certain number of Motorcycle squads per turn (37 if I recall correctly) so it will be hard to keep them at full TOE. And they also use a lot of trucks. So I guess the Soviet player has to make a choice on whether the risk is worth it.
RE: RE:T29
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2019 12:06 pm
by bigbaba1111
Thanks for the information about the sapper units. I remember someone saying here that the problem of the Red Army later in the war is not strength but mobility. I guess I go for some not so mobile support units and save the trucks for tank corps and their tank battalions.
T30
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 6:08 pm
by xhoel
T30, 08th of January-15th of January 1942.
AGN
The enemy has pulled back from their forward positions opposite the Finnish forces. Our troops give chase and attack the weakened Soviets. 2 Soviet formations are forced to rout and an additional Rifle Division is forced to retreat. We are doing our best to put pressure on the Soviets here. Other parts of the front remain static.
Before:
After Axis moves:

RE: T30
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 7:16 pm
by xhoel
RE: T30
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 8:40 pm
by xhoel
RE: T30
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 8:59 pm
by xhoel
Crimea
To our surprise the enemy has not launched an offensive in the Crimea. The front here remains quiet. Rail lines continue to be repaired by FBD 2. We were in for a surprise this week as supply ships coming from Constanta barely managed to escape the claws of the Soviet Black Sea Fleet which keeps patrolling the coast of the Crimea. It seems that our forces here will have to be supplied the normal way, by rail and truck.
PS: I didn't know that the Soviets have a naval control zone if Sevastopol is in their hands. It's a nice addition to the game.

RE: T30
Posted: Mon Feb 11, 2019 9:11 pm
by xhoel
T31
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 8:02 pm
by xhoel
RE: T31
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 8:36 pm
by xhoel
AGC
Our pullback in the Rzhev sector did us some good. The Soviet infantry struggling to move forward in the bad weather only managed to launch 4 attacks on our positions last week. In two of those, we took heavy losses as shown below.
Because the frontline is coming close to Rzhev, we are adopting a new defensive policy: The center of the front (directly north of Rzhev) is to be held by strong forces while the flanks are to be held by more light formations. This would allow the front to straighten and will offer better protection to Rzhev itself.
The enemy surprised us in the Moscow sector by pushing over the Nara river. The GD Mot. Regiment has been sent to reinforce the Infantry division defending there. It is a hard task but hopefully they will succeed in holding back the Soviets at least for 1 more week.
North-east of Tula the enemy launched 3 heavy attacks that forced us to fall back, taking heavy casualties in the process. We pulled back during this week shortening the front line and freeing units for transfer to other parts of the front and for local counterattacks.
Directly in front of Tula the enemy launched 4 attacks. 3 of these attacks succeeded but we manged to hold back one of them. The Soviets pushed weakened and fatigued units to secure their new gains but were in for a tough awakening. Two powerful counterattacks routed 2 Rifle Divisions and 2 Tank Brigades and we managed to retake the positions lost last week.
Counterattack:
The massed Soviet Cavalry Corps attacked in two different directions last week. One direction was to the north-east of Orel and clashed with our armored and motorized formations as well as infantry from the 2nd Army (who retreated after taking heavy losses). The Soviets managed to advance 10 miles before they were forced to stop after their secondary attacks failed.
We pulled the 14th Panzer Division off the line during the week but have kept them close to the front. The division only has 11 operational tanks. They were relieved by the Wiking SS Mot and the 18th Mot. Division.
Positions at the start of the weak with highlighted Cav Corps:
Positions after German moves showing counterattacks and unit movement:
The other direction was south east or Orel and it hit troops that were less prepared than the ones in the north. The Soviets managed to cause heavy losses but only made small gains in terms of territory captured. We transferred the 4th Mtn Division in the area to stem further Soviet attacks. One counterattack against weakened enemy forces failed but two other ones succeeded and managed to rout 3 Tank Brigades and 1 Rifle Division.
RE: T31
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 9:03 pm
by xhoel
RE: T31
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2019 9:20 pm
by xhoel
Crimea
In the Crimea the FBD has reached the town of Armyansk so the supply is improving. Nothing new can be reported from this sector.
Casualties
The Soviets lost a record 101.450 men and 1.115 guns during this week, the heaviest losses so far during the blizzard. AFV losses were also quite high at 623. In terms of KIA the Axis lost 9.140 and the Soviets lost almost 37.000 men, a 4:1 exchange in our favor.
Losses in the air were relatively high for us this turn, with 60 planes lost as opposed to the 308 that the Soviets lost. Transport losses continue to mount up.
Our truck deficit continues to be 33.000.
RE: T31
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 12:21 pm
by MattFL
Great AAR, just spent the last few hours enjoying it and getting caught up. Kinda sucks though, it's like starting to watch a season of Game of Thrones after the first six episodes have aired. Just had a great six episode binge watch but now I have to wait until the new episodes are aired....
I am a few years removed from playing (not since 1.07 ish) but in looking at this, I think the Germans are in good shape for launching a devastating '42 offensive. I'd like to see soviet casualties a bit higher at this point, but really i have no idea how the game plays these days in that regard (other than noting that many feel the soviets have been a bit hamstrung as compared with earlier versions). Early in the game when the Germans didn't breach the Pskov line on Turn 2-3 or threaten in any way the Smolensk land bridge, I was thinking that perhaps the Germans were in trouble. But the later Pskov encirclement was devastating resulting in both Lenningrad and the taking of Smolensk without a shot being fired. A stunning turn of events and probably the biggest mistake made in the game by the Soviet player. Overall, both sides have played this pretty well I think and it seems to be a well balanced game. 1942 will be the make or break year and vegas has the line at -150 Germans.
Xhoel - a few pages back you had posted a screenshot of the entire front. When blizzard wraps up it would be interesting to see a side by side of the pre-blizzard front lines with the post blizzard front lines.
RE: T31
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 2:14 pm
by xhoel
Thanks for the comment MattFL, feels nice to hear the AAR being compared to GOT in terms of entertainment value.
I am relatively pleased with Soviet casualties right now. The Soviets are really bleeding themselves dry and their OOB is not looking good. My casualties on the other hand are quite high due to the mud debacle that I messed up even more by overestimating German mobility during those fateful turns.
The Pskov pocket was really the game changer in the north, and allowed me to do what I later did. With that being said, Leningrad was a very difficult operation considering that the pocket was closed on turn 14 and it was only fully eliminated on turn 23, so the Soviets managed to hold on for 9 weeks and tied up the equivalent of 1 and a half Field Armies.
Both me and Bitburgerdraft feel that the game is quite balanced and close to the historical terms and we are both enjoying it quite a lot. No doubt, 1942 will be the big year where a lot will be decided and I am looking forward to that.
That was exactly the reason why I posted that screenshot. I intend to provide a new one once the blizzard is over and show how the front moved during the harsh winter. But that needs to wait, we still have 6 more turns ahead of us!
RE: T31
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:06 pm
by TunganNinja
I'm impressed you have held onto Rostov so far. No doubt, the light infantry in the sector makes that possible. It would be a great jumping off point come Spring/Summer, and your logistics would be an extra 10 hexes forward than the average Stalino defense. I will be paying close attention to this sector for the next 6 turns. Hope you can hold it against the odds!
RE: T31
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2019 11:56 pm
by xhoel
ORIGINAL: TunganNinja
I'm impressed you have held onto Rostov so far. No doubt, the light infantry in the sector makes that possible. It would be a great jumping off point come Spring/Summer, and your logistics would be an extra 10 hexes forward than the average Stalino defense. I will be paying close attention to this sector for the next 6 turns. Hope you can hold it against the odds!
Thanks Ninja, I hope so too. The Soviets are looking menacing there, they have a lot of units concentrated in the sector, but I will try my best to hold onto the city.
T32
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 11:51 am
by xhoel
T32, 22nd-29th of January 1942
AGN
The Soviets attacked a lone Finnish regiment last week and forced them back. Other than the poor display of leadership of the Finnish command on the defense, the attack had little effect on the situation in the north. We attacked 2 more Soviet positions during this week to good results. The 12th Fin. Infantry Division has been withdrawn.
The Demyansk sector may also see some fighting next week, considering that the Soviets are gathering more units in the area.

RE: T32
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 4:15 pm
by xhoel
RE: T32
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 4:21 pm
by xhoel
RE: T32
Posted: Wed Feb 20, 2019 4:28 pm
by Dinglir
I can't help but feel that there seems to be a lack of a clear plan to the Soviet attacks this winter.
Take the attack on the Finns above. what does the Soviets hope to achieve by such an attack?
1) There are no other attacks in the sector at all, so there seems to be no strategic aim to the attack (at least none that I can see).
2) The Finns have a high morale, so even in case of a Soviet win, they will suffer no real retreat attrition.
3) Some will argue for Guards creations, but they are capped anyway, and a concerted effort elsewhere will surely give the needed wins.
4) I realize some will argue for win accumulation, but the morale of the involved units will simply readjust to their old levels over a couple of turns
As I see it, the Soviets will expend supplies and suffer manpower losses for very few tangible gains with attacks like this.
Another thing I wonder is the presence of entire Rifle divisions holding Voznesenye to the far north of the line. These units must be some nice distance from the nearest railhead and put a little extra strain on the supply system. Why not just place a few Rifle Brigades on the line up here? Should the Finns attack, all they would gain is a little forest, some longer supply lines and a hit to their National Morale as they move south. The Soviets meanwhile would get closer to their own supply lines and be just a little better off.
Anyways, I know it is unfair of me to write this in an Axis AAR. I just wonder, if the Axis players out there sees the situation the same way I do?